General EV Conversation
We have 75-85mph speed limits down here.
In order for the Lucid Air to achieve its EPA range it has to drive 47mph

You mentioned couple days ago about your 100+mpge but I look at overall range. Example the GM has a huge battery but it has impressive range despite it being inefficient.

We have 75-85mph speed limits down here.
In order for the Lucid Air to achieve its EPA range it has to drive 47mph
You mentioned couple days ago about your 100+mpge but I look at overall range. Example the GM has a huge battery but it has impressive range despite it being inefficient.
In order for the Lucid Air to achieve its EPA range it has to drive 47mph

You mentioned couple days ago about your 100+mpge but I look at overall range. Example the GM has a huge battery but it has impressive range despite it being inefficient.

Big GM EV SUVs being inefficient is no different than big GM ICE SUVs being inefficient. They make up for it with huge batteries, and in their ICE models huge gas tanks
Last edited by SW17LS; Jul 29, 2025 at 10:49 AM.
You leave out that the EPA estimated range is over 500 miles. Lucid Air Tourings will get over 400 miles of range at those speeds, which is plenty.
Big GM EV SUVs being inefficient is no different than big GM ICE SUVs being inefficient. They make up for it with huge batteries, and in their ICE models huge gas tanks
Big GM EV SUVs being inefficient is no different than big GM ICE SUVs being inefficient. They make up for it with huge batteries, and in their ICE models huge gas tanks
IMO that is the wrong way to look at it when it comes to EV's. To me, efficiency is more important than just slapping in a giant battery, which adds weight (which creates inefficiency) and expense, which is why the GM trucks are so heavy and expensive. Otherwise just stick with ICE if it's such a concern. Again, just my opinion
Example, I would rather charge once reaching destination rather than charging before reaching my destination. But I don’t want to sacrifice and drive under the speed limit to do so. Because correct me if I’m wrong even with the smaller more efficient battery, it suggests you to charge enough to get to either next charging stop or your destination whichever comes first.
But sometimes having an “efficient” battery with shorter range may not be as time efficient having a bigger heavier battery with longer range right?
Example, I would rather charge once reaching destination rather than charging before reaching my destination. But I don’t want to sacrifice and drive under the speed limit to do so. Because correct me if I’m wrong even with the smaller more efficient battery, it suggests you to charge enough to get to either next charging stop or your destination whichever comes first.
Example, I would rather charge once reaching destination rather than charging before reaching my destination. But I don’t want to sacrifice and drive under the speed limit to do so. Because correct me if I’m wrong even with the smaller more efficient battery, it suggests you to charge enough to get to either next charging stop or your destination whichever comes first.
You leave out that the EPA estimated range is over 500 miles. Lucid Air Tourings will get over 400 miles of range at those speeds, which is plenty.
Big GM EV SUVs being inefficient is no different than big GM ICE SUVs being inefficient. They make up for it with huge batteries, and in their ICE models huge gas tanks
Big GM EV SUVs being inefficient is no different than big GM ICE SUVs being inefficient. They make up for it with huge batteries, and in their ICE models huge gas tanks
“We fit a curve to our data, to be able to estimate what steady-state cruising speed aligns with each vehicle's EPA range figures. For the Lucid Air, it's a mere 47 mph to achieve its 419-mile range figure. But the window-sticker number is a combined figure, and—although it doesn't appear on the label—there's also an EPA highway figure. For the Lucid, its 410-mile EPA highway range matches a marginally higher cruising speed of 49 mph.”
Are we talking about 2 different cars? I was referencing the vehicles used in the article.
From the article
“We fit a curve to our data, to be able to estimate what steady-state cruising speed aligns with each vehicle's EPA range figures. For the Lucid Air, it's a mere 47 mph to achieve its 419-mile range figure. But the window-sticker number is a combined figure, and—although it doesn't appear on the label—there's also an EPA highway figure. For the Lucid, its 410-mile EPA highway range matches a marginally higher cruising speed of 49 mph.”
Are we talking about 2 different cars? I was referencing the vehicles used in the article.
“We fit a curve to our data, to be able to estimate what steady-state cruising speed aligns with each vehicle's EPA range figures. For the Lucid Air, it's a mere 47 mph to achieve its 419-mile range figure. But the window-sticker number is a combined figure, and—although it doesn't appear on the label—there's also an EPA highway figure. For the Lucid, its 410-mile EPA highway range matches a marginally higher cruising speed of 49 mph.”
Are we talking about 2 different cars? I was referencing the vehicles used in the article.
Yes, but are you really that much in a hurry to get to your destination? Remember, for regular driving you don't need to stop to charge, it's long trips, and it's usually no more than a 10 minute stop. If you are driving 400 miles for example, you may get to your destination 30 minutes later over a gas car. If saving 30 minutes is a big concern, than an EV is not for you
But sometimes having an “efficient” battery with shorter range may not be as time efficient having a bigger heavier battery with longer range right?
Example, I would rather charge once reaching destination rather than charging before reaching my destination. But I don’t want to sacrifice and drive under the speed limit to do so. Because correct me if I’m wrong even with the smaller more efficient battery, it suggests you to charge enough to get to either next charging stop or your destination whichever comes first.
Example, I would rather charge once reaching destination rather than charging before reaching my destination. But I don’t want to sacrifice and drive under the speed limit to do so. Because correct me if I’m wrong even with the smaller more efficient battery, it suggests you to charge enough to get to either next charging stop or your destination whichever comes first.
Yes, but are you really that much in a hurry to get to your destination? Remember, for regular driving you don't need to stop to charge, it's long trips, and it's usually no more than a 10 minute stop. If you are driving 400 miles for example, you may get to your destination 30 minutes later over a gas car. If saving 30 minutes is a big concern, than an EV is not for you
My friend took a Google estimated 10hr drive (I don’t remember exact miles) in his model Y LR when he first got it and he said it took well over 12-13hrs. He said he would never do it again. The charging stops opened the door for unplanned snack and “guess I’ll try” bathroom stops.
I agree
My friend spends a whole bunch of time sitting in a waiting room waiting for their gas car to be maintained and repaired.
But even when you stop to charge, you’re not stopping to fully charge, wouldn’t you rather bypass that stop and make it to your destination then charge?
My friend took a Google estimated 10hr drive (I don’t remember exact miles) in his model Y LR when he first got it and he said it took well over 12-13hrs. He said he would never do it again. The charging stops opened the door for unplanned snack and “guess I’ll try” bathroom stops.
I agree
My friend took a Google estimated 10hr drive (I don’t remember exact miles) in his model Y LR when he first got it and he said it took well over 12-13hrs. He said he would never do it again. The charging stops opened the door for unplanned snack and “guess I’ll try” bathroom stops.
I agree











