3IS long term ownership concerns
If you look at Motortrend, they did a compact executive sedan comparison a couple of years ago, and the IS got 4th, only losing to the A4, C-class, and Giulia. In particular, they liked the IS's interior. People seem to be really polarized about the interior. It doesn't look as good in photos as it does in person, and you can't judge seat quality from looking at it.
https://www.motortrend.com/cars/alfa...60-comparison/
That being said, I do agree it could be more spacious. Sporty? Eh, in personality more than in numbers. That could be improved as well, as well as perhaps a more polished suspension. It's firmly damped but not resistant to body roll. There are things that could be improved, but I still thought it was the best out of the 3-4 options I was looking at. No question. It just felt like a more well-built car, and also the V6 engine helped. Compared to the 4-cylinder BMW and Audi, the V6 gave the IS a smoother feel - and it helped that the steering in the IS is a bit heavier as well.
What I will say is stock tires are garbage. They lose traction in the rain and they really hurt your first impressions of the vehicle's handling.
Celebrating Lexus & Toyota from Around the Globe
What I will say is stock tires are garbage. They lose traction in the rain and they really hurt your first impressions of the vehicle's handling.
What I will say is stock tires are garbage. They lose traction in the rain and they really hurt your first impressions of the vehicle's handling.
The good thing about Consumer Reports, despite their impartiality per #2 above, is that they are not at all impacted by advertisements and 3rd party influences. On the other hand, Motortrend and C&D are highly dependant on running ads and influenced by 3rd parties when it comes to car reviews, and in some cases investment by automobile companies in their organizations. Just look at their websites which are plastered with ads whereas CR is not.
Last edited by LaZeR; Mar 3, 2019 at 11:43 AM.
If you look at Motortrend, they did a compact executive sedan comparison a couple of years ago, and the IS got 4th, only losing to the A4, C-class, and Giulia. In particular, they liked the IS's interior. People seem to be really polarized about the interior. It doesn't look as good in photos as it does in person, and you can't judge seat quality from looking at it.
https://www.motortrend.com/cars/alfa...60-comparison/
That being said, I do agree it could be more spacious. Sporty? Eh, in personality more than in numbers. That could be improved as well, as well as perhaps a more polished suspension. It's firmly damped but not resistant to body roll. There are things that could be improved, but I still thought it was the best out of the 3-4 options I was looking at. No question. It just felt like a more well-built car, and also the V6 engine helped. Compared to the 4-cylinder BMW and Audi, the V6 gave the IS a smoother feel - and it helped that the steering in the IS is a bit heavier as well.











