Notices
Performance Forced induction, intakes, exhausts, torque converters, transmissions, etc.

IS200t tune

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 12, 2018 | 11:52 PM
  #2386  
matttev's Avatar
matttev
Rookie
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 79
Likes: 4
From: California
Default

I see you guys talking about fuel. Do you guys recommend anything other than 91 octane for a 2017 with a stage 2 tune?
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2018 | 05:20 AM
  #2387  
loophole35's Avatar
loophole35
Pole Position
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 250
Likes: 45
From: Florida
Default

Originally Posted by matttev
I see you guys talking about fuel. Do you guys recommend anything other than 91 octane for a 2017 with a stage 2 tune?
93 or true race gas. I would not use e85 or mixtures as it requires more fuel. On the subject of the exhaust ports. The Honda motors went to the integrated manifold back in mid 2000’s on the v-6’s and a bit later on the 4 cylinders. Toyota also have done this on the new 2GR (2GR-FKS) this motor is in the new Camry, Tacoma, RX and GS. A turbocharged version will come in the LS500 likely designated 2GR-FTS. Interestingly the FKS has not found its way into the RC or IS.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2018 | 08:11 AM
  #2388  
Sheddy's Avatar
Sheddy
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 409
From: South FL
Default

Doing a tune up before the dyno tune on Monday. Decided to change the plugs since I’m at 34k .

Reply
Old Jan 13, 2018 | 08:31 AM
  #2389  
IS200TFOWL's Avatar
IS200TFOWL
Advanced
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 519
Likes: 93
From: az
Default

Originally Posted by matttev
I see you guys talking about fuel. Do you guys recommend anything other than 91 octane for a 2017 with a stage 2 tune?
Is it stage two or stage two+? If it’s stage two then I’d use 91-93 oct. don’t use race gas, 100-110 would be overkill and if the ecu isn’t adjusted for it then it would just be a waste of race gas and money. If you have stage two plus then advise tony’ the tuner, he announced we could use ethanol mixtures if we changed spark plugs
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2018 | 10:56 AM
  #2390  
matttev's Avatar
matttev
Rookie
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 79
Likes: 4
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by IS200TFOWL
Is it stage two or stage two+? If it’s stage two then I’d use 91-93 oct. don’t use race gas, 100-110 would be overkill and if the ecu isn’t adjusted for it then it would just be a waste of race gas and money. If you have stage two plus then advise tony’ the tuner, he announced we could use ethanol mixtures if we changed spark plugs
Stage 2. Using 91 right now. Not sure where to get 93 tbh
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2018 | 11:57 AM
  #2391  
Sheddy's Avatar
Sheddy
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 409
From: South FL
Default

Originally Posted by matttev
Stage 2. Using 91 right now. Not sure where to get 93 tbh
Once you inform Tony about your premium fuel type (91 & 93 oct) he will adjust the settings accordingly.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2018 | 04:10 PM
  #2392  
MasonGrey's Avatar
MasonGrey
Pole Position
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 366
Likes: 22
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by matttev
Stage 2. Using 91 right now. Not sure where to get 93 tbh
In California, we only get 91/pisswater because of emissions unfortunately.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2018 | 05:50 PM
  #2393  
matttev's Avatar
matttev
Rookie
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 79
Likes: 4
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by MasonGrey
In California, we only get 91/pisswater because of emissions unfortunately.
That's unfortunate
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2018 | 08:51 AM
  #2394  
PATCHEZ's Avatar
PATCHEZ
Driver
 
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 117
Likes: 11
From: FL
Default

Good luck on the dyno sheddy
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2018 | 01:07 PM
  #2395  
Sheddy's Avatar
Sheddy
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 409
From: South FL
Default

Today’s dyno tune didn’t go as expected since it was more of a learning session. This is the first IS200t that he is tuning and we found out that there’s a lot of factory ECU limitations which prevents us for making more power and torque. We started off with a baseline run- 230whp 232wtq and the best for the day was 236whp 250wtq. The reason why BMS makes so much more torque and mid-range power is due to the fact that it fools the ECU, so those limitations are pretty much bypassed. We ran out of time on the dyno to further tune, so he will be heading back to Puerto Rico and he will try to do more testing on a local 200t before we do any more work.

​​​​​​
​​​​​​​​​​​​​​
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2018 | 03:14 PM
  #2396  
IS200TFOWL's Avatar
IS200TFOWL
Advanced
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 519
Likes: 93
From: az
Default

Originally Posted by Sheddy
Today’s dyno tune didn’t go as expected since it was more of a learning session. This is the first IS200t that he is tuning and we found out that there’s a lot of factory ECU limitations which prevents us for making more power and torque. We started off with a baseline run- 230whp 232wtq and the best for the day was 236whp 250wtq. The reason why BMS makes so much more torque and mid-range power is due to the fact that it fools the ECU, so those limitations are pretty much bypassed. We ran out of time on the dyno to further tune, so he will be heading back to Puerto Rico and he will try to do more testing on a local 200t before we do any more work.

​​​​​​
​​​​​​​​​​​​​​



Well that’s still good seeing he could atleast do something. I think it’s all about r&d you’ll need hours on the dyno. I really feel like you need a catted downpipe like you said our platform favors back pressure. Your tq is really low even for a stock tune it’s already around 245wtq, under rated at 280crank. How many dyno runs did you do?

Last edited by IS200TFOWL; Jan 15, 2018 at 03:19 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2018 | 03:54 PM
  #2397  
Sheddy's Avatar
Sheddy
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 409
From: South FL
Default

Originally Posted by IS200TFOWL
Well that’s still good seeing he could atleast do something. I think it’s all about r&d you’ll need hours on the dyno. I really feel like you need a catted downpipe like you said our platform favors back pressure. Your tq is really low even for a stock tune it’s already around 245wtq, under rated at 280crank. How many dyno runs did you do?
With this tuning program it definitely needs time for R&D since the tables don't have any definite values . The boost table just has a bunch of numbers with no actual value such as psi or bar, so its hard to figure out what to add (kudos to Tony and TTi). He adjusted the fuel at certain areas, but then we were faced with another table that will re-adjust the changes, so in all theres a lot of protection/limitation on the stock ECU that avoids you from really getting those parameters locked in. With a bit more time and research he will be able to figure out the tables and then we will try it again. We had 3 hours on the dyno and made around 5-6 passes since most of the time was spent figuring out the tables and then writing the file. I did see a drop in torque with the de-catted down pipe, but it did pick up some power up top, also if you look at the runs they were all done at a higher rpm and our car makes peak torque really early in the rpm range. We did have a discussion that if we are unable to find a way around the limitations or get a better tuning program we will then try to do a custom tune with the BMS since it makes a lot of wtq and we will adjust the a/f ratio up top to help with peak whp.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2018 | 07:24 PM
  #2398  
IS200TFOWL's Avatar
IS200TFOWL
Advanced
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 519
Likes: 93
From: az
Default

Originally Posted by Sheddy
With this tuning program it definitely needs time for R&D since the tables don't have any definite values . The boost table just has a bunch of numbers with no actual value such as psi or bar, so its hard to figure out what to add (kudos to Tony and TTi). He adjusted the fuel at certain areas, but then we were faced with another table that will re-adjust the changes, so in all theres a lot of protection/limitation on the stock ECU that avoids you from really getting those parameters locked in. With a bit more time and research he will be able to figure out the tables and then we will try it again. We had 3 hours on the dyno and made around 5-6 passes since most of the time was spent figuring out the tables and then writing the file. I did see a drop in torque with the de-catted down pipe, but it did pick up some power up top, also if you look at the runs they were all done at a higher rpm and our car makes peak torque really early in the rpm range. We did have a discussion that if we are unable to find a way around the limitations or get a better tuning program we will then try to do a custom tune with the BMS since it makes a lot of wtq and we will adjust the a/f ratio up top to help with peak whp.
Yeah it sounds like your tuner just needs to become more comfortable tuning your car. When I hit the dyno I could do 10 runs in 30 minutes so you guys definitely took your time. I’ve watched tuners tune maps in less than 5 minutes in between each dyno. Sometimes tuners think they’ve gotta wait 30 minutes in between each run to let the car cool down but when it comes down to it any gains while it’s hot are going to be even better then it’s cold
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2018 | 07:28 PM
  #2399  
IS200TFOWL's Avatar
IS200TFOWL
Advanced
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 519
Likes: 93
From: az
Default

We have two other tuners working on a handheld with they’re shop cars so I’m gonna wait it out. Unless trd spec A comes out tomorrow
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2018 | 07:34 PM
  #2400  
Sheddy's Avatar
Sheddy
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 409
From: South FL
Default

We definitely took our time. He was also requesting maps from the program manufacturer to enable rev limiter and so on, but it didn’t get to us on time. In all it was a learning experience and I only spent $100 for 3 hours at the shop which was good since the tuner doesn’t want to charge me until he sees results.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:49 PM.