General Car Conversation
By contrast, my BMW diesel with less than half that displacement makes more than double those numbers, and is basically bulletproof.
I pretty much meant most V8s in existence other than BMW, lol.
from a quick visit to the wikipedia article it seems like they went away from nikasil to alusil fairly early on, and guess what other V8 uses alusil? the M113
By contrast, my BMW diesel with less than half that displacement makes more than double those numbers, and is basically bulletproof.

I said “most V8s” lol. There used to be so many proven V8s out there.
from a quick visit to the wikipedia article it seems like they went away from nikasil to alusil fairly early on, and guess what other V8 uses alusil? the M113

M113 is proven and rock solid. I wouldn’t own the SL if it wasn’t. The last thing someone should would worry about with this car is engine trouble.
By contrast, my BMW diesel with less than half that displacement makes more than double those numbers, and is basically bulletproof.


But yes, generally they're pretty much best in class.
Celebrating Lexus & Toyota from Around the Globe
At any rate, I agree with @AJT123 's thesis that "in general" V8s get to be lazy and are therefore typically more reliable than similarly-built smaller engines in the same use case.
as a former CVPI owner i think one of the best parts of that engine has to be that it makes so much noise and you basically go nowhere, so every merge out of an intersection is like firing up world's wildest police videos on spike TV but then you realize you still haven't even caught up to traffic lmao
At any rate, I agree with @AJT123 's thesis that "in general" V8s get to be lazy and are therefore typically more reliable than similarly-built smaller engines in the same use case.
I would argue it until blue in the face. "In general" for sure, of course there are exceptions and have been. 4100 and Northstar come to mind, engines that just came with fatal flaws. How come GM made legendary engines like the 3800 but put that disgrace of a 4100 in Cadillacs or in anything??? (rhetorical) We had an '87 Seville with it and it was PAINFULLLLLLY slow. Then Dad got a 1990 Seville with the 4.5 update which hauled *** pretty much, night and day difference doesn't even begin to describe it.
In trucks, Ecoboost is lottttts of fun (I miss that monster I had in CA as a loaner) but damn that Ecoboost engine is working a million times harder than the Denali's 6.2. So many more moving parts, heat, etc. Add in towing over 200k miles and 10-15 years? Ehhhhh.
The V8 in my SL is so understressed it's almost funny.
V8s just loafing along, how they do, also explains how I get 20-21 MPG on the interstate in an LX570 rated for 17 highway. 21 MPG in a truck designed when nobody cared about fuel economy, pretty impressive.
Last edited by AJT123; Nov 13, 2023 at 02:28 PM.
I was just having a bit of fun between V8 enthusiasts.
At any rate, I agree with @AJT123 's thesis that "in general" V8s get to be lazy and are therefore typically more reliable than similarly-built smaller engines in the same use case.
If you look in the HD truck space, Ford and GM began reversing their trend of downsizing the gas V8's. Throughout the 2010's, Ford was using a SOHC 6.2 and GM was using an OHV 6.0. These were the sole gas engine options in these trucks.
Fast forward to this decade, GM replaced the 6.0 with a 6.6, while maintaining relative simplicity. Ford replaced the 6.2 with a choice of either a 6.8 or 7.3 OHV gas engine. Overbuilt, under stressed, and simple as a modern engine can be while meeting emissions requirements. I'd be shocked if those engines don't all go to 300k with very few issues.











