Notices
Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova

Mercedes EQS flagship

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 5, 2022 | 12:47 PM
  #826  
AMIRZA786's Avatar
AMIRZA786
Lexus Champion
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 19,487
Likes: 3,672
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by Motorola
It's actually pretty easy to give a car a decent drag coefficient, just lower it, give it flat door handles, smaller side mirrors, and a sloped back- that's all it takes. Turning the car into a jellybean is a conscious design choice.

EQS is selling in the U.S. decently for what it is, its Q1 sales were half of the ICE S-Class, and I'm assuming that's supply constrained. But in China I bet its sales are at least double what it is here.
I've definitely seen more than 10 so far at charging stations. When I went to SoCal a couple of weeks ago there was a guy in an EQS charging next to me, I was going to ask him about the car but when I looked over at him he had this "Please don't bother me" look
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2022 | 01:00 PM
  #827  
Toys4RJill's Avatar
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
10 Year Member
Community Builder
Active Streak: 30 Days
Liked
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 35,285
Likes: 309
From: ON/NY
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
I rounded up lol
Lol. Right. MB has the most aerodynamic EV
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2022 | 01:36 PM
  #828  
SW17LS's Avatar
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
Active Streak: 60 Days
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 68,073
Likes: 3,868
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
Lol. Right. MB has the most aerodynamic EV
But only by a little, and that little bit is at the expense of its styling.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2022 | 01:41 PM
  #829  
Motorola's Avatar
Motorola
Lexus Test Driver
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 5,482
Likes: 89
From: N/A
Default

We're talking about the EQS, but I haven't seen anyone make excuses for the EQE and its 0.22 CoD yet.

Based on size, the EQE is the one that's supposed to be compared to the Model S. Says a lot when a slightly tweaked version of a standard sedan shape from 2012 still has a better drag coefficient than a jellybean released a decade later.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2022 | 06:34 AM
  #830  
RXSF's Avatar
RXSF
CL Community Team
15 Year Member
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Community Builder
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,481
Likes: 198
From: San Francisco, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Motorola
We're talking about the EQS, but I haven't seen anyone make excuses for the EQE and its 0.22 CoD yet.

Based on size, the EQE is the one that's supposed to be compared to the Model S. Says a lot when a slightly tweaked version of a standard sedan shape from 2012 still has a better drag coefficient than a jellybean released a decade later.
here's a try

The EQE definitely looks less jelly bean and has a more traditional slope in the rear end because it doesn't have the length and still needs to provide good rear headroom. Also, it doesn't have length in the front, so it doesn't have the more gradual one bow design of the EQS
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2022 | 07:52 AM
  #831  
TangoRed's Avatar
TangoRed
Lead Lap
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,585
Likes: 24
From: Washington
Default

In reality, the drag coefficient only tells part of the story of how aerodynamic a car is as it leaves out frontal area measurement. The EQS' shape was focused on minimizing that as well. Further, manufacturers know that every wind tunnel can produce different results. Most manufacturers love touting these metrics as if they're directly comparable and consistent for bragging rights knowing they're not. It's kind of like magazine db measurement comparisons; seems like they should be directly comparable but in reality they're not unless measured the same day on the same roads. Car and Driver talked about this once in the past: https://www.caranddriver.com/feature...mparison-test/
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2022 | 02:08 PM
  #832  
Hoovey689's Avatar
Hoovey689
Thread Starter
2UR-GSE Owner
15 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 42,474
Likes: 320
From: California
Default

Saw my first EQS on the highway today. I was really underwhelmed. I'm sure the interior is nice, but the the exterior lacks a stately presence one would associate with a six figure car. Very disappointing
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2022 | 02:20 PM
  #833  
AMIRZA786's Avatar
AMIRZA786
Lexus Champion
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 19,487
Likes: 3,672
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey689
Saw my first EQS on the highway today. I was really underwhelmed. I'm sure the interior is nice, but the the exterior lacks a stately presence one would associate with a six figure car. Very disappointing
I've seen several of them at fast chargers, and I've talked to a few owners. I think more than anything else, the tech is overwhelming, one owner struggled when he started to talk to me about it. Otherwise everyone I've talked to really likes them. I myself am not a fan of the looks either
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2022 | 03:04 PM
  #834  
LeX2K's Avatar
LeX2K
Lexus Fanatic
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 25,917
Likes: 4,274
From: Alberta
Default

Extremely Questionable Styling
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2022 | 06:46 AM
  #835  
SW17LS's Avatar
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
Active Streak: 60 Days
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 68,073
Likes: 3,868
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey689
Saw my first EQS on the highway today. I was really underwhelmed. I'm sure the interior is nice, but the the exterior lacks a stately presence one would associate with a six figure car. Very disappointing
Interior is not that nice either.

Originally Posted by AMIRZA786
I've seen several of them at fast chargers, and I've talked to a few owners. I think more than anything else, the tech is overwhelming, one owner struggled when he started to talk to me about it. Otherwise everyone I've talked to really likes them. I myself am not a fan of the looks either
The W223 has the same problem, people who are just really overwhelmed by the tech.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2022 | 06:56 AM
  #836  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
CL Community Team
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 80,471
Likes: 3,827
Default

Originally Posted by LeX2K
Extremely Questionable Styling
1960 sold in q2 in u.s. not bad.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2022 | 07:24 AM
  #837  
Toys4RJill's Avatar
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
10 Year Member
Community Builder
Active Streak: 30 Days
Liked
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 35,285
Likes: 309
From: ON/NY
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
1960 sold in q2 in u.s. not bad.
The numbers consolidated into a qtr tally looks better a monthly tally . I would have expected higher sales than that.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2022 | 08:15 AM
  #838  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
CL Community Team
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 80,471
Likes: 3,827
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
I would have expected higher sales than that.
for comparison, the s-class sold 2x that #.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2022 | 10:41 AM
  #839  
AMIRZA786's Avatar
AMIRZA786
Lexus Champion
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 19,487
Likes: 3,672
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
for comparison, the s-class sold 2x that #.
That's still not bad for an overpriced Luxury EV with questionable styling decisions. Actually, the styling is for aero...but that's another story
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2022 | 10:49 AM
  #840  
AMIRZA786's Avatar
AMIRZA786
Lexus Champion
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 19,487
Likes: 3,672
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
The W223 has the same problem, people who are just really overwhelmed by the tech.
LOL one guy I was talking to was praising the car, but when he got to the infotainment screens, he stopped talking and got quiet. He then began to stutter and instead of explaining the features, told me that he was totally overwhelmed by all the stuff they put in it. Looking at the "screen(s)", I could see that they could be a huge distraction
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:30 PM.