When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Anyone that thinks turbos are more efficient needs to stop drinking the coolaid. Power is never free and physics cant be defied. Perhaps if someone sits in traffic all day long then yes, a smaller engine will burn less gas but any mixed driving usage, the benefits are not there. I get 15.6 mpg on my GX in mixed driving, while I got 17mpg on the NX200t in similar driving situations.
I've said it a million times sorry it's so repetitive...I get 21mpg in my LX on the highway, rated for 17. Old 2008 engine and transmission, there's more proof that V8s basically don't do anything cruising. 21MPG is very good for any heavy BOF vehicle, let alone one designed and engineered twenty years ago. I don't imagine modern 1500s getting anything better worth writing home about than that. Not significantly at least.
Originally Posted by bitkahuna
not sure what koolaid you're referring to, but turbos are about more power from smaller displacement. if you drive one really gently, you might get better fuel economy, but probably not because the turbos run a lot of the time i think, plus all engine sizes and configurations (plus transmissions) have become so efficient. i was floored when i saw my lc500 can get near 30mpg in easy highway driving. that 10 speed auto is a big factor and the engine is almost idling at 70-80.
And because it's barely having to work. 30MPG and zero fuel economy tricks in that V8 engine that I know of other than DI.
It just bugs me that that isn't good enough for the powers that be. 471hp V8 and 30MPG..... That is excellent.
People don't like the wheezy, coarse sound of 4 cylinder engines either. Nothing about a 4 banger sounds or feels good.
A lot more don't than some of you think, IMO.
If that were true then all the cars that have gone from V6s to turbo 4s would see drop offs in sales, and they don’t. So, if that’s true it doesn’t impact sales and that’s all carmakers care about.
Originally Posted by AJT123
These things look a million times better than the Grand Hylander. In every way. I was behind a white GH today and about fell asleep.
Funny, I think the GH looks WAY better than the TX.
If that were true then all the cars that have gone from V6s to turbo 4s would see drop offs in sales, and they don’t. So, if that’s true it doesn’t impact sales and that’s all carmakers care about.
.
Most people see cars as an appliance and nothing more. They really don't care about the 4 cylinder sound, and they probably don't even know it sounds that way because it's a 4 cylinder. For many of them, it's all they've ever known.
I just did a nationwide search on Cargurus. Of the XV70 Camry(2018-2024), there are 714 available with the V6 and 11,000 available with a 4 cylinder.
Looking at the Explorer for the current generation, there are 2,600 V6's available and 10,000 I4's.
This is a website for people who care about cars. We're not mainstream. The carmakers don't target us because we're not a big enough crowd to be profitable.
Really? I prefer the TX by a mile. It looks better than I thought it would in person to be honest.
I haven't seen a TX in person, my opinion might change once I do
Originally Posted by BrettJacks
Most people see cars as an appliance and nothing more. They really don't care about the 4 cylinder sound, and they probably don't even know it sounds that way because it's a 4 cylinder. For many of them, it's all they've ever known.
I just did a nationwide search on Cargurus. Of the XV70 Camry(2018-2024), there are 714 available with the V6 and 11,000 available with a 4 cylinder.
Looking at the Explorer for the current generation, there are 2,600 V6's available and 10,000 I4's.
This is a website for people who care about cars. We're not mainstream. The carmakers don't target us because we're not a big enough crowd to be profitable.
If that were true then all the cars that have gone from V6s to turbo 4s would see drop offs in sales, and they don’t. So, if that’s true it doesn’t impact sales and that’s all carmakers care about.
Right, but people are gonna always buy new cars. You're not wrong though.
Originally Posted by SW17LS
Funny, I think the GH looks WAY better than the TX.
Lol so crazy how wildly different all our opinions are. I think the TX looks legit, it's got great paint and it looks larger than GH. Not yet seen the interior in person.
Most people see cars as an appliance and nothing more. They really don't care about the 4 cylinder sound, and they probably don't even know it sounds that way because it's a 4 cylinder. For many of them, it's all they've ever known.
I just did a nationwide search on Cargurus. Of the XV70 Camry(2018-2024), there are 714 available with the V6 and 11,000 available with a 4 cylinder.
Looking at the Explorer for the current generation, there are 2,600 V6's available and 10,000 I4's.
This is a website for people who care about cars. We're not mainstream. The carmakers don't target us because we're not a big enough crowd to be profitable.
This. Most don't care as long as it moves the car and doesn't feel wanting, most don't go to redline and actually experience the car fully. For that reason, especially here....engines and throttles are calibrated to feel "best" at mid rpm and provide an enthusiastically non-linear response to tip in. It's jarring when I go from my cars to the other vehicles sometimes since my cars are all retuned to 1:1 throttles
There is no point buying the big engine if you aren't going to use it, much better off with the normal one. That's why my Jeep has the I-6 and the VW has the VR6 vs the V8 and V10....I gain noting with the larger engines and tow rating remains the same. However the bigger engines will always feel better overall and retain more value and certain features are paywalled behind them.
Physically small engines with turbos etc do better in low loads, if pushed and expected to move the car the way as a larger engine they use the same or more fuel. My last loaner ES250 was a great example of that, I needed to spin it to 5k+ to have the car move like the 460 does at 2500-3200 and since I got to compare them 1:1 MPG was 1.3 worse in the 250 and felt WAY worse the whole time.
In that same vein my 460 beats my 4.0 Audi interstate since off boost the Audi has the turbos in the way and an inferior NA tuning side. They get 28.5 to 32.5 on the same trip same average speed, once in boost the 4.0 drops to 21 at best, the W12 does the best balance of speed to MPG being happiest at 85 mph and 24.5 mpg.....it's still the worst of them though unless I activate it's multi cylinder management mode. Then it gains 3 but I don't like having only one engine running at a time
I’ve been seeing a lot of new TX’s around and they look good. It definitely looks better in person. I have not checked out the interior yet or driven the car yet.
Is the third row actually usable in these? I’ve used them in the GX470, GX460, and LX570. It absolutely sucked. I rode in the back of an LX for a work trip and it was so small. Perfect for little kids that didn’t need need car seats or boosters.
If that were true then all the cars that have gone from V6s to turbo 4s would see drop offs in sales, and they don’t. So, if that’s true it doesn’t impact sales and that’s all carmakers care about.
At the end of the day, what's the alternative? If you want a high powered V6 or V8 cars, you go to big pickups or high end luxury vehicles or the Korean brands.
At the end of the day, what's the alternative? If you want a high powered V6 or V8 cars, you go to big pickups or high end luxury vehicles or the Korean brands.
There have been V6s in the segment still available and people weren’t buying them.
Mainstream buyers by and large don’t care. Don’t even know. My wife has no idea what kind of engine is in either car.
I just asked her, “how many cylinders are in your car?” She says “4 I think”. Nope, 6. “How many cylinders are in my car?” Her response “8 or 12?” If I hadn’t corrected her about hers I bet she would have said mine was 6.
There have been V6s in the segment still available and people weren’t buying them.
Mainstream buyers by and large don’t care. Don’t even know. My wife has no idea what kind of engine is in either car.
I just asked her, “how many cylinders are in your car?” She says “4 I think”. Nope, 6. “How many cylinders are in my car?” Her response “8 or 12?” If I hadn’t corrected her about hers I bet she would have said mine was 6.
Most people are like her.
Recall how everyone complained that Toyota is behind the times with their lack of turbo offerings? Lack of EVs and only going with hybrids? Well, as the saying goes, becareful what you wish for and in hindsight, Toyota is completely correct.
Recall how everyone complained that Toyota is behind the times with their lack of turbo offerings? Lack of EVs and only going with hybrids? Well, as the saying goes, becareful what you wish for and in hindsight, Toyota is completely correct.
Oh yeah, they made the right move.
I'd direct everyone to go to the lower middle to poor areas of their own and count how many BEVs you see. I haven't seen any.