Notices
Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova

General EV Conversation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 19, 2025 | 06:24 AM
  #7531  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
nerd
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 80,219
Likes: 3,717
From: happy
Default

if the incentive or penalty is big enough, it’s a distinction from force in name only.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2025 | 07:11 AM
  #7532  
SW17LS's Avatar
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
Active Streak: 60 Days
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 67,644
Likes: 3,785
From: Maryland
Default

Bringing it back to EVs and incentives, in business we use incentives all the time to get behavior we want. Even if those incentives are so great you can't say no. Examples, builders give closing cost credits so huge if you use their lender and their title company that the buyer can't say no. By law, the buyer gets to choose their lender and title company but if they are leaving $25,000 on the table by going with someone else...that just isn't worth it. We incentivize agents to give up space in the brokerage business all the time. We have limited brick and mortar office space, so we give higher splits and marketing money etc to agents who give up their physical office space.

I don't see how society is harmed by the government giving a tax break to people who buy energy efficient or environmentally efficient things. We give them for windows, appliances, building materials...why not cars? The net result is we have homes that are more energy efficient and the consumer gets a tax break to help offset the higher initial cost of the better materials and products. With cars, we have more efficient and less polluting cars on the road and we have given a tax break to help consumers offset the higher initial cost of buying an EV. I don't see the difference.

Last edited by SW17LS; Oct 19, 2025 at 07:14 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2025 | 07:47 AM
  #7533  
Toys4RJill's Avatar
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
10 Year Member
Community Builder
Active Streak: 30 Days
Liked
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 35,251
Likes: 290
From: ON/NY
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
Bringing it back to EVs and incentives, in business we use incentives all the time to get behavior we want. Even if those incentives are so great you can't say no. Examples, builders give closing cost credits so huge if you use their lender and their title company that the buyer can't say no. By law, the buyer gets to choose their lender and title company but if they are leaving $25,000 on the table by going with someone else...that just isn't worth it. We incentivize agents to give up space in the brokerage business all the time. We have limited brick and mortar office space, so we give higher splits and marketing money etc to agents who give up their physical office space.

I don't see how society is harmed by the government giving a tax break to people who buy energy efficient or environmentally efficient things. We give them for windows, appliances, building materials...why not cars? The net result is we have homes that are more energy efficient and the consumer gets a tax break to help offset the higher initial cost of the better materials and products. With cars, we have more efficient and less polluting cars on the road and we have given a tax break to help consumers offset the higher initial cost of buying an EV. I don't see the difference.
Great points
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2025 | 11:26 AM
  #7534  
LeX2K's Avatar
LeX2K
Lexus Fanatic
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 25,911
Likes: 4,269
From: Alberta
Default

This thread has gone heavily off topic if you know what I mean.

Back on topic at least to an extent I had a conversation with Grok about building out a 10,000 square mile solar array (cell surface area not total infrastructure area). The math works out to about 12 years to get it done, would supply 3x more power than the United States currently uses. Cost will be $7 trillion, payback time 20-25 years. This is doable. And in before the skeptics will howl about solar panels being dirty, this array would be 75% cleaner out of the gate that rate would increase over time.

It's depressing we didn't start on this 10 years ago, instead still burning coal and natural gas to generate power. Sunk cost fallacy is super powerful here. The opportunity for the auto sector is unbelievable, after paying the pollution tax to make EVs they become 100% clean.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2025 | 11:32 AM
  #7535  
SW17LS's Avatar
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
Active Streak: 60 Days
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 67,644
Likes: 3,785
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by LeX2K
It's depressing we didn't start on this 10 years ago, instead still burning coal and natural gas to generate power. Sunk cost fallacy is super powerful here. The opportunity for the auto sector is unbelievable, after paying the pollution tax to make EVs they become 100% clean.
This is a video that I enjoyed that made this same point. EV critics say that an EV is environmentally more damaging to make than an ICE, and this person agrees that is true but points out that after as quickly as just a couple years that totally flips.

Reply
Old Oct 19, 2025 | 11:34 AM
  #7536  
Margate330's Avatar
Margate330
Lexus Champion
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 10,997
Likes: 1,524
From: FL
Default

Originally Posted by LeX2K
This thread has gone heavily off topic if you know what I mean.

Back on topic at least to an extent I had a conversation with Grok about building out a 10,000 square mile solar array (cell surface area not total infrastructure area). The math works out to about 12 years to get it done, would supply 3x more power than the United States currently uses. Cost will be $7 trillion, payback time 20-25 years. This is doable. And in before the skeptics will howl about solar panels being dirty, this array would be 75% cleaner out of the gate that rate would increase over time.

It's depressing we didn't start on this 10 years ago, instead still burning coal and natural gas to generate power. Sunk cost fallacy is super powerful here. The opportunity for the auto sector is unbelievable, after paying the pollution tax to make EVs they become 100% clean.
Good points.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2025 | 11:34 AM
  #7537  
Margate330's Avatar
Margate330
Lexus Champion
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 10,997
Likes: 1,524
From: FL
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
This is a video that I enjoyed that made this same point. EV critics say that an EV is environmentally more damaging to make than an ICE, and this person agrees that is true but points out that after as quickly as just a couple years that totally flips.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MicJ46YX5Lg
I will watch.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2025 | 03:59 PM
  #7538  
LeX2K's Avatar
LeX2K
Lexus Fanatic
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 25,911
Likes: 4,269
From: Alberta
Default

Incentives are often counterproductive because they feed layers of bureaucracy instead of giving value to the consumer. Look at what happened recently in New Jersey a Tesla Supercharger stop was ripped out and replaced by a piece of crap that barely works paid for by yours truly.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2025 | 05:34 AM
  #7539  
neurocity's Avatar
neurocity
Ca Ca Ca Cacommunity Mod
20 Year Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,807
Likes: 681
From: Chicago
Default

Morning.
I will admit I was super pissed reading the back and forth banter here. (no wonder why the debate forums were removed)
The fact that it got reported so many times by so many people. (not just the people who said they were reporting) Is just infuriating...Ya'all are gown-***-adults!

Carry on. Be civil and stay on topic.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2025 | 07:15 AM
  #7540  
MDlexus's Avatar
MDlexus
Intermediate
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 316
Likes: 76
From: New Jersey
Default

They are starting to review the ES90.

Reply
Old Oct 22, 2025 | 09:30 AM
  #7541  
swajames's Avatar
swajames
Lead Lap
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,813
Likes: 1,413
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Been looking at the EX90. There's a lot to like about it and a lot of potential with some yet-to-be-released features but there do seem to be a lot of software issues with these.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2025 | 09:49 AM
  #7542  
AMIRZA786's Avatar
AMIRZA786
Lexus Champion
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 19,330
Likes: 3,626
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by swajames
Been looking at the EX90. There's a lot to like about it and a lot of potential with some yet-to-be-released features but there do seem to be a lot of software issues with these.
I'm just telling you, the software issues are no joke. I loved my Polestar, but having to reboot my infotainment system once or twice a week becomes an annoyance. One you can live with, but still an annoyance
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2025 | 10:13 AM
  #7543  
MDlexus's Avatar
MDlexus
Intermediate
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 316
Likes: 76
From: New Jersey
Default

As for me, I haven't experienced much in the way of software issues and I'm on my second one. But I do like this ES90.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2025 | 10:25 AM
  #7544  
AMIRZA786's Avatar
AMIRZA786
Lexus Champion
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 19,330
Likes: 3,626
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by MDlexus
As for me, I haven't experienced much in the way of software issues and I'm on my second one. But I do like this ES90.
I wouldn't say that the issues I had were a nightmare, but stuff would stop working, like for example the HVAC, Google maps etc. Reboot generally fixed it. I have to say that despite that, I loved my Polestar, and would have gotten another one as a commuter had the price been more competitive. By the time my lease had ended, you could only get the fully loaded models that were way above my budget
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2025 | 10:30 AM
  #7545  
MDlexus's Avatar
MDlexus
Intermediate
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 316
Likes: 76
From: New Jersey
Default

Yeah...Haven't had those issues, fortunately.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:56 AM.