When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I remember reading that at the time, and I remember test driving all those cars when we were looking for the LS400. Pretty cool for a 17 year old to get to drive all those incredible cars. The only one we didn’t look at was the Audi.
Yep, I was a Junior in HS when this article came out.
I also got to drive every S-Class back when I had family in South Florida, from 320 to 600 V12, E38 740iL and 750iL V12, but I was 15 on a learner's permit driving these $100k cars (in mid-late 90s money), it was kind of insane. The licensed drivers let me put the cars through their paces, plenty.
Originally Posted by SW17LS
The S Class and the 7 were significantly bigger than the LS, but the LS at the time was just a package that was right sized in and out and just an undeniable value for a car that in many ways was also the best car. Best riding, quietest, smoothest engine. In the end for my dad it was between the 740 and the LS, there was a CPO 97 740 if I remember correctly that he really seriously considered. We were so excited with the LS we used to trade off driving to and from places lol
I can see why the LS is the winner for sure and agree, but I would take the Mercedes second. Even though it is slow, they aren't wrong when they say it moved faster than the numbers say. And that MB is built as solidly as that Lexus (reliability, no). I remember loading up in one, full car, and my dad just took off full throttle and I was shocked it was an S320. They should have brought in the S420 at least, for 8 grand more in this test so it would have had a V8. S420s were semi-quick once up to speed, S500s were fast at any speed. S600 I didn't get a chance to drive hard at all. Notice that the article says the overwhelming majority of W140s sold were S500s, the second most expensive one at $90,000+ which is $155k today. Remember back when people wanted big big engines? They bought them and had no problem paying for it. I think they still would if we still had those options. A big draw of a Denali/High Country is the 6.2.
I can see why the LS is the winner for sure and agree, but I would take the Mercedes second. Even though it is slow, they aren't wrong when they say it moved faster than the numbers say. And that MB is built as solidly as that Lexus (reliability, no). I remember loading up in one, full car, and my dad just took off full throttle and I was shocked it was an S320. They should have brought in the S420 at least, for 8 grand more in this test so it would have had a V8. S420s were semi-quick once up to speed, S500s were fast at any speed. S600 I didn't get a chance to drive hard at all. Notice that the article says the overwhelming majority of W140s sold were S500s, the second most expensive one at $90,000+ which is $155k today. Remember back when people wanted big big engines? They bought them and had no problem paying for it. I think they still would if we still had those options. A big draw of a Denali/High Country is the 6.2.
The problem was the S Class at that time being really old, it came out in 91 as a 92 model, and it was dramatically more expensive. When you drove the W140 against those cars the only reason that presented itself to choose it was because it was an S Class. It felt absolutely ancient inside. The LS and 7 rode better, were quieter, has more modern tech and feel especially the LS400. The reason why they used the S320 was it was the only way to make it remotely comparable in cost.
A similar S Class to my dad's 98 LS400 would have cost $30,000 more, 50% more, that was just a non starter. Now, had the W220 been out at that time, it would have been much more competitive. Way more modern and pricing was a little easier to swallow, no 6 cyl etc. Thats exactly why they made the W220 cheaper, the W140 was just way too expensive.
Thats exactly why they made the W220 cheaper, the W140 was just way too expensive.
and a big reason it was so expensive in the first place was the LS 400! when that first came out in 1989 mercedes was basically caught with its pants down and had to rush to add extra features, ultimately resulting in delays and budget overruns
unfortunately i think the W220 suffered as a result of them trying to "undo" their financial setbacks and excess of the W140... eventually the W220 got better and was the first platform to get the V8 Kompressor and V12 Biturbo engines as well as ABC suspension (so for that i appreciate it lol) but it was never quite the tank its predecessor was
ClubLexus Stories
Celebrating Lexus & Toyota from Around the Globe
10 Lexus Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
8 Tips for Improving Your Hybrid or Plug-in Hybrid's Efficiency!
Michael S. Palmer
10 Best Lexus Models No One Remembers
Joe Kucinski
TRD Off-Road Premium: Best 2026 4Runner, Except This One Thing
Michael S. Palmer
Top 10 Lexus & Toyotas to Drive Before You Die!
Joe Kucinski
Top 10 Lexus/Toyotas With The LEAST 5-Year Depreciation
Joe Kucinski
Lexus LC500 Convertible Auction: A Preview of Rising Values?
Brett Foote
GX 550 vs TX 550: Best 3-Row Luxury Lexus Family Hauler
Michael S. Palmer
9 Best Lexus Models You Can Buy for Half Price (And 1 You Shouldn't!)
‘They should not have used that car as a comparison. A S320 does not make sense. Mercedes and BMW were vastly ahead of Lexus LS in 1998.
Yet the LS400 won the test.
That really wasn’t true at the time, the LS really was superior in many ways AND cheaper. Best riding, quietest car with the most refined powertrain. When you compared it to the S and the 7, there was really no reason to buy either of them other than the badge.
A few of the other cars were also 70k, for 8k more they should have picked an S420 with the V8.
W140 and E38 drove great, W140 was old but I personally don’t care. They drove amazingly well. Yes Mercedes being way more expensive, that’s just how they were then. People paid the piper for them, they sold.
I never have had extended personal experience with any LS400, which is a shame. I have no doubt it was fully competitive.
.
That really wasn’t true at the time, the LS really was superior in many ways AND cheaper. Best riding, quietest car with the most refined powertrain. When you compared it to the S and the 7, there was really no reason to buy either of them other than the badge.
Car and Driver should have used a V8 short wheelbase Mercedes. Makes no sense to compare a. 6 cylinder long wheelbase car to a short wheel base V8. The Lexus was 500lbs lighter…the Mercedes was in a higher class of automobiles. Would you compare a short wheel base Tundra with a V8 to a long wheel base V6 Ford…makes no sense.
They were comparing flagship sedans, and that’s what the LS was…and again the LS won so it’s hard to say it can’t be compared to cars that it beat in the comparison test.
In that Car & Driver test, remember after that test came out the LS destroyed the Germans in sales to the point where they had to make massive shifts in their product design and offerings.
Car and Driver should have used a V8 short wheelbase Mercedes. Makes no sense to compare a. 6 cylinder long wheelbase car to a short wheel base V8. The Lexus was 500lbs lighter…the Mercedes was in a higher class of automobiles
Indeed, W140 was engineered to run with the absolute nicest cars like Bentleys, etc.
However there was no SWB V8, just the 320 was offered in SWB and they were easy to spot bc they were the only W140s without wiper headlights.
Look where Lexus ranks here…. The BMW is on another level with a V12. But…makes no sense to campare a V8 to a V12
from the review:
But keep in mind that the Lexus marketers never intended to position the car as a top-of-the-line luxury machine. Remembering that, and remembering that the Lexus folks definitely consider it a workable alternative to expensive luxury cars, the LS400 emerges as a fox in the henhouse.
"I can't believe that this car compares so well to the expensive cars," was a comment heard more than a few times during our testing days.
they also said the transmission was the best of all 4 cars, and even ranked it higher than the bentley overall... it was also their favorite highway cruiser and the only real "issue" is the lack of badge prestige