IS 500 - CEL problem and update
So last week I had the APEXi catback installed. After a couple days, I got a CEL that indicated and engine control issue and sonar issue. Knowing about the exhaust gasket issue I looked a saw that the shop had used the APEXi gaskets on the mid pipe to header gasket. I thought about it and decided to replace the APEXi gaskets with the stock gaskets that I kept from the APEXi install.
After re-installing the stock gaskets, I cleared the CEL and haven’t had it come back yet.
if you’re getting g this CEL, tighten or change the gaskets at the header/mid pipe.
I bought 2 new gaskets just in case there’s an issue going forward with the-using the originals.
After re-installing the stock gaskets, I cleared the CEL and haven’t had it come back yet.
if you’re getting g this CEL, tighten or change the gaskets at the header/mid pipe.
I bought 2 new gaskets just in case there’s an issue going forward with the-using the originals.
^^ Am i misinterpreting your post? I think Fman said that the problem happened when they used the non-Lexus gasket and that the problem went away when they replaced the aftermarket gasket with the OEM ones...
The shop was able to replicate the issue probably with no foreknowledge of gasket leak and with their own part. Aftermarket parts are designed and built to a specification from the manufacturer. They did not change. The fitment on the car's exhaust changed.
^^ I see what you mean, however, the OEM part is also the same as used by several other applications (RC F, GS F) so it is a bit baffling that these OEM gaskets work on some IS 500 with no issues and fail in some. I am wondering if they have outsourced some gasket production and those newly sourced gaskets are the one failing and obviously, it would be a random car that get these. Or something totally different...Maybe I'll stick to the weather and/or crude innuendos which the things I am best known for (lol)
^^ I see what you mean, however, the OEM part is also the same as used by several other applications (RC F, GS F) so it is a bit baffling that these OEM gaskets work on some IS 500 with no issues and fail in some. I am wondering if they have outsourced some gasket production and those newly sourced gaskets are the one failing and obviously, it would be a random car that get these. Or something totally different...Maybe I'll stick to the weather and/or crude innuendos which the things I am best known for (lol)
I was led to this solution because of the new cars that have had CELs due to exhaust gasket leaks. I was getting the same codes and it appears, I correctly assumed that the paper gaskets might be the cause.
🫰
Yes sir, that’s what I said. I re-installed the stock gaskets and the issue was corrected.
I was led to this solution because of the new cars that have had CELs due to exhaust gasket leaks. I was getting the same codes and it appears, I correctly assumed that the paper gaskets might be the cause.
🫰
I was led to this solution because of the new cars that have had CELs due to exhaust gasket leaks. I was getting the same codes and it appears, I correctly assumed that the paper gaskets might be the cause.
🫰
That's where I'm struggling. Enjoy a sweet sounding V8 via an aftermarket exhaust for 8 glorious years and face the consequences later? Or just be content with the car and never have to worry about not being street legal?
I will say in industrial applications, a leak from a gasketed connection is installation error (e.g. loose bolting, incorrect sequencing) about 90% of the time or more. Could be an issue in the install procedure at the factory, dropped torque wrench, etc. The other plausible scenario is some misalignment of a flange or something during manufacture. That could easily affect a large number of cars but not all of them.
I'm somewhat combining your post from the Picture thread where you showed your awesome new exhaust but I've been thinking about this a lot more because I'm considering a catback exhaust myself. Say that in 8 years when it comes time to smog check your car, you can't pass smog, and I'm convinced we wouldn't be able to because I actually called a couple smog places and performance exhaust shops and they all confirmed it wouldn't pass visual without that rear cat. So then you decide to switch your exhaust back to stock for the smog test. BUT, then you encounter the CEL again and it's not something you can fix yourself this time. At that point our cars are out of warranty (I think). What do we do then? Seems like a nightmare scenario. Am I thinking about this too hard?
That's where I'm struggling. Enjoy a sweet sounding V8 via an aftermarket exhaust for 8 glorious years and face the consequences later? Or just be content with the car and never have to worry about not being street legal?
That's where I'm struggling. Enjoy a sweet sounding V8 via an aftermarket exhaust for 8 glorious years and face the consequences later? Or just be content with the car and never have to worry about not being street legal?
As far as the CEL goes, it’s known to be caused by a leak at the flange. Simply replacing the gaskets in those affected cars has remedied the problem. Mine was a leak from an aftermarket gasket, resulting in the same codes. All I did was reinstall the factory gaskets. They’re just gaskets, they’re easily replaced. $52 for the pair from Lexus.
There’s a simple solution to your concerns. Leave the mods with the secondary cats in place and get an “axle-back” exhaust.
Last edited by Fman2118; Apr 26, 2022 at 05:34 PM.
You’re overthinking this. It’s not that difficult to swap in/out the mid pipes for emissions testing if needed.
As far as the CEL goes, it’s known to be caused by a leak at the flange. Simply replacing the gaskets in those affected cars has remedied the problem. Mine was a leak from an aftermarket gasket, resulting in the same codes. All I did was reinstall the factory gaskets. They’re just gaskets, they’re easily replaced. $52 for the pair from Lexus.
There’s a simple solution to your concerns. Leave the mods with the secondary cats in place and get an “axle-back” exhaust.
As far as the CEL goes, it’s known to be caused by a leak at the flange. Simply replacing the gaskets in those affected cars has remedied the problem. Mine was a leak from an aftermarket gasket, resulting in the same codes. All I did was reinstall the factory gaskets. They’re just gaskets, they’re easily replaced. $52 for the pair from Lexus.
There’s a simple solution to your concerns. Leave the mods with the secondary cats in place and get an “axle-back” exhaust.
I just spent the past 40 minutes reading 8 years of stories about this in the IS F forum. The general conclusion was that any modified part of the exhaust will fail inspection if the tech is doing his/her job (and they usually do) and even bribing the tech barely works anymore. Seems the best chance to pass without a swap-out is to go to a "friendly" shop by word of mouth, and who knows how many of those will exist in the year 2030. It's also super interesting that most RC F owners in CA with aftermarket exhaust parts have never experienced this yet since their cars (2015+) won't be due for smog until 2023. Maybe I'll go to the RC F forum to see what they plan to do and get em riled up LOL. Jk. I'm just super curious. It's fun learning about this stuff.
I will say in industrial applications, a leak from a gasketed connection is installation error (e.g. loose bolting, incorrect sequencing) about 90% of the time or more. Could be an issue in the install procedure at the factory, dropped torque wrench, etc. The other plausible scenario is some misalignment of a flange or something during manufacture. That could easily affect a large number of cars but not all of them.
^^ I see what you mean, however, the OEM part is also the same as used by several other applications (RC F, GS F) so it is a bit baffling that these OEM gaskets work on some IS 500 with no issues and fail in some. I am wondering if they have outsourced some gasket production and those newly sourced gaskets are the one failing and obviously, it would be a random car that get these. Or something totally different...Maybe I'll stick to the weather and/or crude innuendos which the things I am best known for (lol)
Last edited by Fman2118; Apr 27, 2022 at 06:17 AM.
^^ Yeah, I know that some dealers had some parts on hand while some don't - If you live somewhere with a larger dealer network, chances are there is a better chance of getting some parts available but waiting 3 weeks is not out of norm. There was a guy in Vancouver (David) who bought an IS 500 and he does car review and even his unit had the same problem and had to wait for weeks to get the gasket. Sure, it is not a deal breaker to have to wait as the car is sill drivable but I didn't want to deal with the hassle of potentially having to go to the dealer twice as I live about 1h from the closest dealer and this way, for 30$, I have the peace of mind to have the part when I need it
So far so good though but I am still early into the break in period with only 450 km on the odometer.
So far so good though but I am still early into the break in period with only 450 km on the odometer.









