Lexus Fanatic
Quote:
The Maverick actually looks good. The Santa Cruz looks likes it is trying too hard. Originally Posted by Motorola
The Maverick can be total garbage like the new Explorer and it would still outsell the Santa Cruz just like the Explorer outsells the Palisade. Hyundai alone just doesn't have the same production numbers when it comes to crossovers as Ford.
Quote:
I doubt the two are being cross-shopped because those who buy a Maverick are dead set on owning a Ford truck, just like they are on owning an Explorer no matter how trash it came out the factory. Either way, the current market dictates that both Ford and Hyundai are selling every Maverick and Santa Cruz their dealerships can get their hands on (with markups to boot), and the overall sales numbers are merely a reflection of how much they can manufacture.Originally Posted by mmarshall
To be fair, I mentioned earlier that I thought the Hyundai seemed more solidly assembled, had better fit/finish, comes with a much longer warranty, and will likely be more reliable (if the engines don't catch fire LOL). That is likely one reason why it also costs more than the Maverick to start.....stripped Mavericks theoretically start at 20K, but good luck finding one. And the Maverick, like other smaller Ford crossovers, suffers from some indifference in its trim quality, paint-gloss, and interior hardware. But, any way you look at it, it is simply more of a truck, period....even lacking a truck-type ladder-frame. The Santa Cruz is more of a successor to the Subaru Baja of the early/mid 2000s.
Quote:
lol, Ford could dress up the Maverick as a Cybertruck and it would still outsell the Santa Cruz.Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
The Maverick actually looks good. The Santa Cruz looks likes it is trying too hard.
Quote:
While I understand your view, I'm not quite sure that's the case. The Maverick is not designed to do the work (or guzzle gas) like larger Ford BOF trucks do. It appeals to a different set of buyers, for a different purpose. The Santa Cruz, probably even more so.Originally Posted by Motorola
I doubt the two are being cross-shopped because those who buy a Maverick are dead set on owning a Ford truck, just like they are on owning an Explorer no matter how trash it came out the factory
Quote:
The Maverick is a Ford truck for people who don't want the expense of a truck. It's a Ford truck before it's a competitor to the Santa Cruz. It sells for the same reason the Bronco Sport sells.Originally Posted by mmarshall
While I understand your view, I'm not quite sure that's the case. The Maverick is not designed to do the work (or guzzle gas) like larger Ford BOF trucks do. It appeals to a different set of buyers, for a different purpose. The Santa Cruz, probably even more so.
Quote:
Well, then they aren't getting a real truck. No matter how you slice it, you aren't going to be able to tow or haul several tons of cargo in a Maverick like with an F-150. It is a "truck" for relatively light work only....maybe a trip down to Lowe's for some new kitchen chairs or light appliances.Originally Posted by Motorola
The Maverick is a Ford truck for people who don't want the expense of a truck.
Like I said earlier, it's basically a 21st-Century Ranchero or El Camino with four doors.
Quote:
You're assuming that everyone who buys a truck will actually use it as a truck rather than a lifestyle symbol, which couldn't be further from the truth. You might as well be asking how many people take their Range Rovers offroad.Originally Posted by mmarshall
Well, then they aren't getting a real truck. No matter how you slice it, you aren't going to be able to tow or haul several tons of cargo in a Maverick like with an F-150. It is a "truck" for relatively light work only....maybe a trip down to Lowe's for some new kitchen chairs or light appliances.
The average person doesn't even know what "body-on-frame" means, they see a "Ford truck" they can actually afford and that's enough for them to part with their cash. I bet you more people would consider a Maverick over the new Toyota Tundra.
Striker223
Lexus Champion
close
- Join DateOct 2019
- LocationOhio
- Posts:18,300
-
iTrader Positive Feedback0
-
iTrader Feedback Score(0)
-
Likes:377
-
Liked:1,783 Times in 1,374 Posts
Double post
Striker223
Lexus Champion
close
- Join DateOct 2019
- LocationOhio
- Posts:18,300
-
iTrader Positive Feedback0
-
iTrader Feedback Score(0)
-
Likes:377
-
Liked:1,783 Times in 1,374 Posts
Quote:
I second this, not I nor anyone I know consider this ford a truck. However it's appealing for other reasonsOriginally Posted by mmarshall
While I understand your view, I'm not quite sure that's the case. The Maverick is not designed to do the work (or guzzle gas) like larger Ford BOF trucks do. It appeals to a different set of buyers, for a different purpose. The Santa Cruz, probably even more so.
I also would never considering owning a ford truck after working on so many of them, the F150 is probably one of the worse vehicles ever made quality wise and ease of repair. The diesel 250s and up are acceptable but not great.
Lexus Fanatic
Quote:
.
This really makes no sense. Ford is going after younger buyers and have priced the Mav so cheap so they can gain those who currently drive cheap cars (like Hyundai, KIA). Absolutely would crossed shopped. Originally Posted by Motorola
I doubt the two are being cross-shopped because those who buy a Maverick are dead set on owning a Ford truck, just like they are on owning an Explorer no matter how trash it came out the factory. Either way, the current market dictates that both Ford and Hyundai are selling every Maverick and Santa Cruz their dealerships can get their hands on (with markups to boot), and the overall sales numbers are merely a reflection of how much they can manufacture..
Quote:
Ford is a full manufacturer. Hyundai doesn’t have the widespread models get Ford has. Most people would trust Ford before they would trust a Hyundai. Even Hyundai buyers admire what Ford can offer Originally Posted by Motorola
lol, Ford could dress up the Maverick as a Cybertruck and it would still outsell the Santa Cruz.
Quote:
.
spot on MMOriginally Posted by mmarshall
Well, then they aren't getting a real truck. No matter how you slice it, you aren't going to be able to tow or haul several tons of cargo in a Maverick like with an F-150. It is a "truck" for relatively light work only....maybe a trip down to Lowe's for some new kitchen chairs or light appliances..
Quote:
I also would never considering owning a ford truck after working on so many of them, the F150 is probably one of the worse vehicles ever made quality wise and ease of repair. The diesel 250s and up are acceptable but not great.
It looks like a truck. So I think people will just refer to it as a truck. Originally Posted by Striker223
I second this, not I nor anyone I know consider this ford a truck. However it's appealing for other reasonsI also would never considering owning a ford truck after working on so many of them, the F150 is probably one of the worse vehicles ever made quality wise and ease of repair. The diesel 250s and up are acceptable but not great.
Quote:
Then you can say that, to you, it has the presence/appearance of a larger vehicle, but you can't state that it is significantly larger, when in FACT it is not. Originally Posted by mmarshall
The Maverick, because of its styling, roofline, two-box design, and space-efficiency, gives it the appearance and suggestion of a larger vehicle. The Santa Cruz, IMO, compromises too much in its styling and design. I strongly suspect (but can't prove) that is one thing that is driving the Maverick's sales.....plus the availability of a Hybrid version.
Quote:
Ask your average family what the difference is between a Ridgeline and F150, that should tell you all you need to know about the public awareness of what constitutes a truck.Originally Posted by Striker223
I second this, not I nor anyone I know consider this ford a truck. However it's appealing for other reasons
Quote:
Except the Santa Cruz isn't cheap, and neither is the Maverick in its top trims. In fact it's virtually impossible to buy a base model Maverick. The Maverick is only cheap in the sense that it's cheaper than a BOF truck.Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
This really makes no sense. Ford is going after younger buyers and have priced the Mav so cheap so they can gain those who currently drive cheap cars (like Hyundai, KIA). Absolutely would crossed shopped.
If price truly dictated actual cross-shopping, then the F150 wouldn't be demolishing the Tundra in sales multiple times over. If people want a Ford truck, they will buy a Ford truck.
Quote:
Ford is a full manufacturer. Hyundai doesn’t have the widespread models get Ford has.
Pretty funny thing to say considering Ford axed its entire sedan lineup unlike Hyundai. Ford is a full manufacturer. Hyundai doesn’t have the widespread models get Ford has.

Quote:
Most people would trust Ford before they would trust a Hyundai. Even Hyundai buyers admire what Ford can offer
lol, and what is the factual basis for this?Most people would trust Ford before they would trust a Hyundai. Even Hyundai buyers admire what Ford can offer
Lexus Fanatic
Quote:
MM never said it was “significantly” larger. He said it has the appearance that it is larger. Originally Posted by pbm317
Then you can say that, to you, it has the presence/appearance of a larger vehicle, but you can't state that it is significantly larger, when in FACT it is not.
Quote:
"Significant" may be a relative term....not necessarily relegated to what you call a "fact". As Jill (correctly) points out, it is higher in stance and about 4 inches longer. The hood line is higher, the front-end engine-compartment is higher, there is more interior volume, and the bed is longer. It gives the appearance of a larger vehicle......whether one wants to use the term "significant" or not is open to interpretation. But it IS larger by the numbers. Originally Posted by pbm317
Then you can say that, to you, it has the presence/appearance of a larger vehicle, but you can't state that it is significantly larger, when in FACT it is not.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
Ford is a full manufacturer. Hyundai doesn’t have the widespread models get Ford has.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Motorola
Pretty funny thing to say considering Ford axed its entire sedan lineup unlike Hyundai.
That's true, but it's apples and oranges. We aren't talking about sedans in this thread, but the Maverick and crossovers. There, Jill is correct....Ford DOES build a widespread line of crossovers.....with perhaps more to come.
However, to say that Hyundai doesn't equal Ford in having a widespread line of crossovers is not quite correct either. Hyundai does the Venue, Kona, Tucson, Santa Fe, Palisade, and now the Santa Cruz....and other crossovers that are not sold in the American market. And even that doesn't include either the Lincoln crossovers from Ford or the Kia/Genesis crossovers from Hyundai.
Quote:
Correct. Thank You, Jill.Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
MM never said it was “significantly” larger. He said it has the appearance that it is larger.
If people are going to quote others in this thread, they need to be quoted correctly. 









