Ford Maverick pickup
That's true, but it's apples and oranges. We aren't talking about sedans in this thread, but the Maverick and crossovers. There, Jill is correct....Ford DOES build a widespread line of crossovers.....with perhaps more to come.
However, to say that Hyundai doesn't equal Ford in having a widespread line of crossovers is not quite correct either. Hyundai does the Venue, Kona, Tucson, Santa Fe, Palisade, and now the Santa Cruz....and other crossovers that are not sold in the American market. And even that doesn't include either the Lincoln crossovers from Ford or the Kia/Genesis crossovers from Hyundai.
However, to say that Hyundai doesn't equal Ford in having a widespread line of crossovers is not quite correct either. Hyundai does the Venue, Kona, Tucson, Santa Fe, Palisade, and now the Santa Cruz....and other crossovers that are not sold in the American market. And even that doesn't include either the Lincoln crossovers from Ford or the Kia/Genesis crossovers from Hyundai.
If Ford had no trucks, they would have zero appeal as a brand outside of maybe the Mustang.
Last edited by Motorola; Dec 30, 2021 at 06:42 PM.
Thanks. This isn't really what you call a mini truck.....certainly not like the old Chevy LUV, Ford Courier, Isuzu P'UP, etc....which really were mini-trucks. It is definitely larger-looking in person than in pictures, and significantly larger than Hyundai's Santa Cruz.
So how was that quoted incorrectly?
I never said the Maverick wasn't larger than the Santa Cruz, I said it's 4 inches, but no one is going to be able to discern that difference in length.
Reminds me why I took a pause from Car Chat.
Check the receipts below...
"significantly larger...."
So how was that quoted incorrectly?
I never said the Maverick wasn't larger than the Santa Cruz, I said it's 4 inches, but no one is going to be able to discern that difference in length.
Reminds me why I took a pause from Car Chat.
"significantly larger...."
So how was that quoted incorrectly?
I never said the Maverick wasn't larger than the Santa Cruz, I said it's 4 inches, but no one is going to be able to discern that difference in length.
Reminds me why I took a pause from Car Chat.
4 inches, in this particular vehicle class IMO is significant....it would not be significant, for example, with Suburbans or Expeditions. You are free to disagree....and I will respect that view. But let's do it politely.
Last edited by mmarshall; Dec 30, 2021 at 07:19 PM.
Check the receipts below...
"significantly larger...."
So how was that quoted incorrectly?
I never said the Maverick wasn't larger than the Santa Cruz, I said it's 4 inches, but no one is going to be able to discern that difference in length.
Reminds me why I took a pause from Car Chat.
"significantly larger...."
So how was that quoted incorrectly?
I never said the Maverick wasn't larger than the Santa Cruz, I said it's 4 inches, but no one is going to be able to discern that difference in length.
Reminds me why I took a pause from Car Chat.
Last edited by Toys4RJill; Dec 30, 2021 at 07:41 PM.
Fine. We can disagree politely.
But have you seen a Maverick up close, and/or reviewed one? As Jill says (and I totally agree) the 4 inches (and the styling) give the impression of a larger vehicle.
Here's a side profile of both vehicles, at roughly the same scale. IMO, the Maverick looks substantially more.....well, substantial.


Fine. We can disagree politely.
But have you seen a Maverick up close, and/or reviewed one? As Jill says (and I totally agree) the 4 inches (and the styling) give the impression of a larger vehicle.
Here's a side profile of both vehicles, at roughly the same scale. IMO, the Maverick looks substantially more.....well, substantial.



But have you seen a Maverick up close, and/or reviewed one? As Jill says (and I totally agree) the 4 inches (and the styling) give the impression of a larger vehicle.
Here's a side profile of both vehicles, at roughly the same scale. IMO, the Maverick looks substantially more.....well, substantial.


Last edited by pbm317; Dec 30, 2021 at 07:59 PM.
When I am wrong, I admit it...which I have done a number of times. My eyes don't lie. Neither do Jill's. And I never said it was MUCH bigger....the numbers give it about 4" in length. Some of the difference is, like I said earlier, an impression from how the cabin and bed are styled.
Anyhow, IMO enough about exterior size. Here's an interesting stat on the Hybrid......some owners are getting up to 600 miles combined on gas/electric power. This is especially interesting considering that previous Ford Hybrids (such as the C-Max) have been criticized for under-performing in that department.
https://www.hotcars.com/ford-maveric...ressive-range/
PUBLISHED 11 HOURS AGO
One forum member claims to have gotten almost 600 miles in the hybrid model.
via FordThe Ford Maverick is the smallest truck that the Blue Oval currently produces, and the hybrid version brings the truck right into the 21st century. Since its launch, the 2022 Maverick seems to be outperforming what its predicted range expectations were.
A report from Muscle Cars & Trucks citing the Maverick Truck Club Forum suggests that owners have been able to eke out nearly 600 miles per tank with their hybrid versions of the Maverick.
Overall, before they filled up, they did some 595.2 miles in total, on both electric and gasoline power, and the image shows that there were still some 24 miles of range left in their tank before they would have run it dry. For Ford’s smallest truck, these are some mighty impressive figures.
RELATED: With An EPA Rating Of 42MPG The 2022 Ford Maverick Hybrid Is Now Our Favorite Little Truck
Sadly, there was no figure as to what the electrical power did in this truck, although this might not have been the hybrid model. Whichever way you look at it, both of these are very impressive performance figures.
RELATED: Here's Why Ford Offers Free AWD Upgrade For Some Maverick Buyers
A lot of users on their forum were simply amazed at the amount of mileage that was being gained from these trucks. One of them, username nunucello, simply replied to one of them with “outstanding!” That is certainly one word we can use to describe this. We will wait and see if anyone can make it to 600 miles before they need to fill up.
https://www.hotcars.com/ford-maveric...ressive-range/
Ford Maverick Owners Are Getting Seriously Impressive Range On One Tank
BY HENRY KELSALLPUBLISHED 11 HOURS AGO
One forum member claims to have gotten almost 600 miles in the hybrid model.
via FordThe Ford Maverick is the smallest truck that the Blue Oval currently produces, and the hybrid version brings the truck right into the 21st century. Since its launch, the 2022 Maverick seems to be outperforming what its predicted range expectations were.
A report from Muscle Cars & Trucks citing the Maverick Truck Club Forum suggests that owners have been able to eke out nearly 600 miles per tank with their hybrid versions of the Maverick.
Exceptional Levels Of Fuel Mileage
via Maverick Truck ClubThe highlight of this report comes from an image posted by forum user Mavforever. This image shows off their recent trip statistics, and it's astonishing. The truck averaged 44.1 mph according to the image, and it was able to do some 269.9 miles on its electric power.Overall, before they filled up, they did some 595.2 miles in total, on both electric and gasoline power, and the image shows that there were still some 24 miles of range left in their tank before they would have run it dry. For Ford’s smallest truck, these are some mighty impressive figures.
RELATED: With An EPA Rating Of 42MPG The 2022 Ford Maverick Hybrid Is Now Our Favorite Little Truck
More Users Report Good Maverick Mileage Statistics
via Maverick Truck ClubMavforever was not the only user on the forum to post their impressive mileage statistics. Another user with the name Sylvester got close to the 595.2-mile figure, themselves making it 575.0 miles in total with 19 miles left before the truck would have become empty.Sadly, there was no figure as to what the electrical power did in this truck, although this might not have been the hybrid model. Whichever way you look at it, both of these are very impressive performance figures.
RELATED: Here's Why Ford Offers Free AWD Upgrade For Some Maverick Buyers
The Maverick Itself Is An Impressive Truck
via FordThese statistics just show that the Maverick, as a whole, is an incredibly impressive truck. The hybrid version has a 2.5-liter naturally aspirated Atkinson cycle four-cylinder engine, and its hybrid system helps give an extra 191 hp. This hybrid feature is clearly helping these users get this extra mileage out of their Mavericks.A lot of users on their forum were simply amazed at the amount of mileage that was being gained from these trucks. One of them, username nunucello, simply replied to one of them with “outstanding!” That is certainly one word we can use to describe this. We will wait and see if anyone can make it to 600 miles before they need to fill up.
Ask your average family what the difference is between a Ridgeline and F150, that should tell you all you need to know about the public awareness of what constitutes a truck.
Except the Santa Cruz isn't cheap, and neither is the Maverick in its top trims. In fact it's virtually impossible to buy a base model Maverick. The Maverick is only cheap in the sense that it's cheaper than a BOF truck.
If price truly dictated actual cross-shopping, then the F150 wouldn't be demolishing the Tundra in sales multiple times over. If people want a Ford truck, they will buy a Ford truck.
Pretty funny thing to say considering Ford axed its entire sedan lineup unlike Hyundai.
lol, and what is the factual basis for this?
Except the Santa Cruz isn't cheap, and neither is the Maverick in its top trims. In fact it's virtually impossible to buy a base model Maverick. The Maverick is only cheap in the sense that it's cheaper than a BOF truck.
If price truly dictated actual cross-shopping, then the F150 wouldn't be demolishing the Tundra in sales multiple times over. If people want a Ford truck, they will buy a Ford truck.
Pretty funny thing to say considering Ford axed its entire sedan lineup unlike Hyundai.

lol, and what is the factual basis for this?
Factual basis for the last bit is if we leave the F150 out of this I've only ever replaced 3 ford engines vs 11 Hyundai units. If you include the Fail-150.......well let's just say 5.4 3V and if you know you know.
I find myself really wanting one of these fords, I need to stop looking at them before I do something stupid like buy one.
Last edited by Striker223; Dec 30, 2021 at 10:00 PM.
Factual basis for the last bit is if we leave the F150 out of this I've only ever replaced 3 ford engines vs 11 Hyundai units. If you include the Fail-150.......well let's just say 5.4 3V and if you know you know.
One thing is certain- if people preferred Ford over Hyundai, Ford wouldn't have killed everything that isn't a crossover, truck, or Mustang.
Last edited by Motorola; Dec 31, 2021 at 01:29 AM.
Thanks. This isn't really what you call a mini truck.....certainly not like the old Chevy LUV, Ford Courier, Isuzu P'UP, etc....which really were mini-trucks. It is definitely larger-looking in person than in pictures, and significantly larger than Hyundai's Santa Cruz.
I realize that this is an internet forum,and not a legal contract, and precision of words is not top of mind of most posters here. But just say "Oh, what I meant was it 'appears' significantly larger; sorry if I wasn't clear" -- then there's no debate.
Last edited by tex2670; Dec 31, 2021 at 05:26 AM.
No -- @mmarshall literally said the Maverick is "significantly" larger.
I read it exactly as everyone else is. Maybe this was meant to read "it looks significantly larger", but the words say what they say. The best way to not be misquoted is to say what you mean, and mean what you say.
I realize that this is an internet forum,and not a legal contract, and precision of words is not top of mind of most posters here. But just say "Oh, what I meant was it 'appears' significantly larger; sorry if I wasn't clear" -- then there's no debate.
I read it exactly as everyone else is. Maybe this was meant to read "it looks significantly larger", but the words say what they say. The best way to not be misquoted is to say what you mean, and mean what you say.
I realize that this is an internet forum,and not a legal contract, and precision of words is not top of mind of most posters here. But just say "Oh, what I meant was it 'appears' significantly larger; sorry if I wasn't clear" -- then there's no debate.
This argument is over...I have said what I intend to say, and will not continue to debate it with you. I'm moving on.









If people are going to quote others in this thread, they need to be quoted correctly. 






