General Car Conversation 2024 - part 2
I'm having an agent reshop insurance for us as our renewal is 4k/yr for 2 vehicles. That is with just 1 accident over 3 yrs ago, other person's fault (rear ended at a red light).
Same. My cousin actually has a TX
So before getting my Rav I actually set out if buy one of these V6 4WD gems. I researched and searched all over for one that was still in somewhat decent condition. I was dead set on getting a V6 4WD Rav until having a talk with couple family members in which one said “just get a brand new one”. That put an end to my search. 😆
So before getting my Rav I actually set out if buy one of these V6 4WD gems. I researched and searched all over for one that was still in somewhat decent condition. I was dead set on getting a V6 4WD Rav until having a talk with couple family members in which one said “just get a brand new one”. That put an end to my search. 😆
So before getting my Rav I actually set out if buy one of these V6 4WD gems. I researched and searched all over for one that was still in somewhat decent condition. I was dead set on getting a V6 4WD Rav until having a talk with couple family members in which one said “just get a brand new one”. That put an end to my search. 😆
My brother had a FWD V6 RAV4 a few years ago. Great engine but Too much power for the narrow front tires.
Oh yeah. One of the first things my father taught me driving was to never cruise in the left lane, traffic or not. It’s basically common sense, yet there are a lot of dumb people out there.
Yes it is, because back then the competition wasn't nearly as good and the 200/LX570 series was a great truck. LX was a solid choice a decade ago, for example. Now it's just outclassed in every way. No power running boards for $134k??? This recalled V6 engine and wow, now a fun hybrid ..... yawn.
I never considered the LX as a vehicle, to me a RR has always been a much more compelling vehicle...its always been a niche vehicle and that really hasn't changed. I don't think the new LX is that different than the old LX compared to the competition..only change is the lack of the V8 but most Range Rovers are not V8s either.
And don't ignore the fact that the new LX does sell better than the old LX.
Everything costs 15-20% more, or have you not noticed over these last few years? I paid 3k more for an HVAC, 25% more than the downstairs one I replaced prior to 2021.
I'm going to see if I can find out why it increased, I wonder if they'll tell me.
I wouldn't be shocked if they did raise my rates, but I think it's just risen with the COL.
I'm going to see if I can find out why it increased, I wonder if they'll tell me.
I wouldn't be shocked if they did raise my rates, but I think it's just risen with the COL.
Note that there is no "claim free" or "good driver" discount listed, so those discounts aren't going into your renewal pricing which is costing you money in the premium.
We get it, you hate hybrids lol
I never considered the LX as a vehicle, to me a RR has always been a much more compelling vehicle...its always been a niche vehicle and that really hasn't changed. I don't think the new LX is that different than the old LX compared to the competition..only change is the lack of the V8 but most Range Rovers are not V8s either.
And don't ignore the fact that the new LX does sell better than the old LX.
I never considered the LX as a vehicle, to me a RR has always been a much more compelling vehicle...its always been a niche vehicle and that really hasn't changed. I don't think the new LX is that different than the old LX compared to the competition..only change is the lack of the V8 but most Range Rovers are not V8s either.
And don't ignore the fact that the new LX does sell better than the old LX.
My other point is that LX570 was much, MUCH more competitive in its day. Like I said, 10 years ago an LX was a solid choice. The competition caught up and surpassed it big time. And the new one is just so disappointing in so many way. Great seats, I'll give it that.
This new one sells more, but not that many more. It always be a low selling truck compared to Escalades etc.
Going up $50 a month isn't a bit deal. It's just all this shytttt adds up and I'm sick of it.
What I have said is it’s a mistake for Lexus not to have a vehicle with wider appeal and I believe that.
other point is that LX570 was much, MUCH more competitive in its day. Like I said, 10 years ago an LX was a solid choice. The competition caught up and surpassed it big time. And the new one is just so disappointing in so many way. Great seats, I'll give it that.
Maybe, maybe not. EVERYONES insurance has risen. I just got off the phone with my mother, hers has skyrocketed. @FrankReynoldsCPA said he pays 50% more with zero violations and accidents.
Going up $50 a month isn't a bit deal. It's just all this shytttt adds up and I'm sick of it.
Going up $50 a month isn't a bit deal. It's just all this shytttt adds up and I'm sick of it.
Pricing of insurance coverage is complex, a lot goes into it but of course the cost you create for the company in claims and the likelihood that you will file claims goes into that pricing.
For example, your coverage is about the same cost as my coverage despite having much cheaper older cars (much less overall liability for them) more cars but dramatically cheaper cars and living in a much lower cost area. Were the same age etc.
Last edited by SW17LS; Oct 12, 2024 at 10:03 AM.
Do all the shock absorbers of the versions of nx300h are the same ? Or only the f sport version has the active variable suspension ?
Is the E - four version different from f sport from this point of view ? Or the e-four is just like any other nx ? Thank you !
Is the E - four version different from f sport from this point of view ? Or the e-four is just like any other nx ? Thank you !
Duly noted. It took third in a 2015 MT comparison FWIW. They loved its capability and just the luxury of having it all. It was a lot more competitive 10 years ago, like I've said a couple times.
I'm insuring 4 cars.... the Yukon is still worth at least 70 something.
Well they've added the TX and new GX, but I'll tell ya I'm not seeing too many of these TXs around and I figured they'd be at every corner.
It is when I consider insurance has paid out 20k in 3 years in claims.
I'm insuring 4 cars.... the Yukon is still worth at least 70 something.
We argued about the LX570 until blue in the face. But we can leave it.
Me too, but now Lexus finally does have a "competitive crossover". I don't see very many. Now it's not a gauge of the entire nation, but I figured they'd be absolutely everywhere around here.
I never said it was impossible that my claims have risen the rates, but I will note that you told me about 30 times they were gonna drop me.. No such thing. You get a warning before, it happened to me when I was 16.
Right.... I get how insurance works. Yukon is a '22.
Which is why they have to charge you more than somebody similar who they haven’t paid out any claims for, it only makes sense. Of course the cost of your insurance is less than the cost of your claims, that’s because the risk is spread across all their customers. You are absolutely paying more than you would be paying if you had no claims though.
The total amount of risk though is much smaller because the total value of the cars is considerably less. They also probably have your primary as the car that’s the cheapest to save you in premium, if they are halfway decent insurance agents. Adding cars without primary drivers doesn’t add a whole lot to the policy. What year is the Yukon?
Believe it or not, my Rav has more interior space than the 22+ RXs. In addition I wanted NA engine.
I did no such thing lol
It’s not that compelling a vehicle. Lots of vehicles I would buy before one.
Which is why they have to charge you more than somebody similar who they haven’t paid out any claims for, it only makes sense. Of course the cost of your insurance is less than the cost of your claims, that’s because the risk is spread across all their customers. You are absolutely paying more than you would be paying if you had no claims though.
The total amount of risk though is much smaller because the total value of the cars is considerably less. They also probably have your primary as the car that’s the cheapest to save you in premium, if they are halfway decent insurance agents. Adding cars without primary drivers doesn’t add a whole lot to the policy. What year is the Yukon?
It’s not that compelling a vehicle. Lots of vehicles I would buy before one.
Which is why they have to charge you more than somebody similar who they haven’t paid out any claims for, it only makes sense. Of course the cost of your insurance is less than the cost of your claims, that’s because the risk is spread across all their customers. You are absolutely paying more than you would be paying if you had no claims though.
The total amount of risk though is much smaller because the total value of the cars is considerably less. They also probably have your primary as the car that’s the cheapest to save you in premium, if they are halfway decent insurance agents. Adding cars without primary drivers doesn’t add a whole lot to the policy. What year is the Yukon?














