When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
the thing toyota did masterfully was push the whole “electrification” buzzword (classic “FUD” strategy), hyping hybrids more than anything, and making it the “sensible” choice, which aligns perfectly with toyota/lexus’ customers. most of toyota’s products are now hybrids. they sell hardly any ev’s. we’ll see how the new highlander ev does. the new ch-r ev does not appear to be selling well at all.
for most people, filling up with gas is fine. the great range that hybrids provide is great. and hybrids have become smoother than ever. so i think most consumers just think “ev’s = limited range, hassle charging on trips, expensive, weird, not mainstream”. i’m i’m right about this, ev’s will have a hard time making much of a big dent in new car sales until those perceptions change.
older people don’t want change. younger people don’t want or can’t afford cars.
To me there is win win for both. It’s obvious Tesla and EVs have come and ICE is still here and there is currently room for both. Why does it have to be one or the other?
I think these are, as least, some of the reasons, whether they are true or not:
1) Its more expensive to do both and run two production lines.
2) It makes R&D, investment weaker in each category. Battery tech doesn't change as fast, # of charging stations don't grow as fast
3) Some people see EV as "saving" the world, and ICE as more polluting.
To me there is win win for both. It’s obvious Tesla and EVs have come and ICE is still here and there is currently room for both. Why does it have to be one or the other?
agreed and i have no issue at all with ice continuing and improving. just saying i think any significant ev marketshare gains will take years without government assistance (which i don't approve of but was happy to take last year ).
I think these are, as least, some of the reasons, whether they are true or not:
1) Its more expensive to do both and run two production lines.
2) It makes R&D, investment weaker in each category. Battery tech doesn't change as fast, # of charging stations don't grow as fast
3) Some people see EV as "saving" the world, and ICE as more polluting.
For me it's pretty simple. It's not about saving the world, it's not about saving money, although that is a side benefit. It's about a vastly better driving experience, to get a similar experience you need a car that's almost twice the price. It's about being virtually maint free, and it's about having the ability to fuel at home. That's it. I don't want to save the world. I don't want to be a global warming champion. I want a better driving experience. Toyota doesn't even come close with their hybrids. Again, just my opinion
agreed and i have no issue at all with ice continuing and improving. just saying i think any significant ev marketshare gains will take years without government assistance (which i don't approve of but was happy to take last year ).
Tax credits or no tax credits, my next car will be another Tesla...unless they decide to remove the steering wheel by that time
right, but you’re already ‘sold’. i don’t expect many consumer reports subscribers to do that.
Tesla adoption is highest in the following States: California, Florida, Texas, and Washington state, in that order. Just a matter of time before more and more people in other states get curious and have a taste. But again, no single brand will have 100 percent adoption
besides gas costs, the sun shines a lot there and tons of people have solar. there’s also the largest charging network there, and of course tesla began and was based there (and still has fremont plant).
besides gas costs, the sun shines a lot there and tons of people have solar. there’s also the largest charging network there, and of course tesla began and was based there (and still has fremont plant).
it is interesting that Texas is the #2 solar area in the US