When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Oh for sure. Toyota and especially their body on frame models are always in high demand. They sell every one they make. That said, the new Tundra is vastly superior compared to the outgoing model. Toyota finally offers a fully boxed frame like their Japan made pick up trucks. I don’t really find the hybrid model to be worth it over the V6
Oh for sure. Toyota and especially their body on frame models are always in high demand. They sell every one they make. That said, the new Tundra is vastly superior compared to the outgoing model. Toyota finally offers a fully boxed frame like their Japan made pick up trucks. I don’t really find the hybrid model to be worth it over the V6
Agreed. I would skip it. I wish the hybrid was a n/c option on higher trims rather than standard. I think that's a mistake Toyota is making with this. Not as bad as no Auto 4WD but worth pointing out.
just checkin in...hit 500 miles on the odo. so far so good. started to open it up a bit and take it out into the wild and hills behind my place. power delivery and transmission is smooth. for my first tank i got about 440+ miles ave about 15mpg. it was all driving around town varying speeds and rpms. only about 20% hwy.
from where i'm coming from, yes. my supercharged 08 tundra with all terrain's and stage four lift kit gets about 8-10mpg and only has a 26 gal tank. i spend a lot of time filling up ole reliable. the other problem is lead foot.
The link you provided shows the 3.5 ecoboost, which is probably the most comparable to the Tundra's 3.4 TTV6, as 18 city, 23 hwy, and 20 combined. Tundra is rated at 17 city, 22 hwy, 19 combined, so about 1 mpg less on the EPA test.