When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I'm sure I could find plenty of online evidence but I do have non-scientific first hand evidence:
The last of the 90s Devilles I saw on the road were not Northstar powered. I used to always notice that back when there were lots of them on the road years ago.
The old 200hp 4.9 pushrod (pre-Northstar) Mike mentioned was a very solid and reliable motor, but yes outclassed by the DOHC competition by the early/mid 90s which is why the Northstar was developed.
How many miles did your parents' Caddy have on it when they got rid of it?
My parents had their Caddy for ten years. Trust me, lots of things broke, the engine was just not one of them. I don’t think it was ever towed for not starting or anything like that. But lots of things stopped working and needed repairs They had about 195,000km on it when they traded it in for their first ever Toyota.
Maybe up in Canada's cold climate the Northstar was more dependable. In hotter climates it overheated and blew headgaskets. My former boss at that time had a Caddy with the Northstar that blew the headgasket with only 40k.
The late 80's GM 3.8L motors are excellent engines...but the most remarkable thing about them was how dramatic the improvement from the prior series.
I had an 81 Buick Regal that was the slowest, worst MPG, oil burning piece of ****...I joked they took an OPEC nation off line when it got crushed. Between the poor fuel economy & endless oil I added to it.
Then with the fuel injection & other improvements in the mid 80's the 3.8L became a responsive, excellent fuel economy, reliable motor.
Really night and day difference.
Engine management can make even more of a difference than the engine internals.
Maybe up in Canada's cold climate the Northstar was more dependable. In hotter climates it overheated and blew headgaskets. My former boss at that time had a Caddy with the Northstar that blew the headgasket with only 40k.
Possible. There also will be cars that never had the issue, but its an extremely widespread issue.
the only 3800 powered vehicle i actually really want is a 1987 grand national / GNX, that's probably the only time it actually made a decent output and was pushing around something that actually looked good
the only 3800 powered vehicle i actually really want is a 1987 grand national / GNX, that's probably the only time it actually made a decent output and was pushing around something that actually looked good
Lol I don't "want" any 3800 powered car either, they're junkers by now.
I was just talking about its legacy and how it held its own in the day.
And come on, I can name quite a few 3800 powered cars that looked good in their day.
Lol I don't "want" any 3800 powered car either, they're junkers by now.
I was just talking about its legacy and how it held its own in the day.
My Optometrist is the original owner of an '87 Grand national with less than 40k miles, and that thing is awesome. In GNX form, you're talking about a nearly 35-year-old, super comfortable 3800-lb family car that can run a 12.7 second quarter mile in stock trim.
Keep in mind, the 3800 was positioned as GM's top of the line V6 - they also had the 3.1 and 3.4 that were truly awful.
I had a 2001 Buick Century - my first car, actually - that had a version of the 3.1. It was... okay. 30 MPG on the highway no problem, but the 4-speed trans really gutted the car of any off-the-line oomph. The car had a curb weight of only 3300 lbs and made 175 horsepower, so you'd think it wouldn't be that slow... but it was.
Most annoying thing about that car was the intermittent false-alarm CEL. I got those about once a year and the mechanic would always say there was no actual issue.
Lol I don't "want" any 3800 powered car either, they're junkers by now.
I was just talking about its legacy and how it held its own in the day.
And come on, I can name quite a few 3800 powered cars that looked good in their day.
fair enough 90s GM can make it easy to forget there were some good looking ones back in the day in the 60s and 70s, which also just goes to show how antiquated the engine was by the end of its production run lol
My Optometrist is the original owner of an '87 Grand national with less than 40k miles, and that thing is awesome. In GNX form, you're talking about a nearly 35-year-old, super comfortable 3800-lb family car that can run a 12.7 second quarter mile in stock trim.
it's such a cool device... just thinking about all that glorious 80s turbo lag gets me all giddy
Most annoying thing about that car was the intermittent false-alarm CEL. I got those about once a year and the mechanic would always say there was no actual issue.
Did you check the gas cap? Simply not having it on tight enough (or a worn rubber seal on it) can set off the CEL. That's because there are sensors that detect gas-fumes getting past the cap into the air.
Did you check the gas cap? Simply not having it on tight enough (or a worn rubber seal on it) can set off the CEL. That's because there are sensors that detect gas-fumes getting past the cap into the air.
It's been a while. It's possible I wasn't putting the gas cap on right, but it seemed like clockwork, every year I would get a CEL. The mechanic would clear it, and it wouldn't return until the following year. The car only had 60,000 miles when I finally traded it in (inherited from grandmother who barely drove it).