BUICK 3800: The best engine EVER!
i mean claiming it's quicker than a ferrari F40? lol good luck with that... also i don't think the McLaren that made the GNX is the McLaren that I've heard people claim it is
I know pretty much nothing about GNX, but I doubt its 80ies fuel injection system and ECU were advanced enough where you could gain much by reprogramming. GM did not have many FI applications, GNX was one of the very few, and I'm pretty sure for that motor it was already pretty much at the maximum from the factory. In the 90ies many guys reprogrammed their modified GMs, but these were mostly NA V8 guys. A friend of mine for shts and giggles reprogrammed a rental Chevy to have something like 40mph speed limit.

Still, if you wanted these big old GM engine to produce respectable power at the top, you had to get more aggressive cams, and because of their nature they idled like crap and ran like crap in the low RPM range. Good for drag strip, but utterly useless for daily driving. Japanese motors with variable valve timing could do both.
That being said, I didn't know EPA mandated open ECU data? I've heard quite the opposite, at least from the Ford diesel guys - some of the data is now encrypted in order to prevent people from getting rid of cats, EGR and DPF systems.
i mean claiming it's quicker than a ferrari F40? lol good luck with that... also i don't think the McLaren that made the GNX is the McLaren that I've heard people claim it is
and having driven a stock supra turbo, there's no way it makes 'only' 320 hp... my initial reaction was people need this to be even faster!?
anyway lobux already posted the C/D article for the GNX and they got 13.5s in the 1/4 mile which is very impressive but 12.7 (stock at least) will never happen... i'd love to be shown video evidence that proves otherwise though
and having driven a stock supra turbo, there's no way it makes 'only' 320 hp... my initial reaction was people need this to be even faster!?
anyway lobux already posted the C/D article for the GNX and they got 13.5s in the 1/4 mile which is very impressive but 12.7 (stock at least) will never happen... i'd love to be shown video evidence that proves otherwise though
I know pretty much nothing about GNX, but I doubt its 80ies fuel injection system and ECU were advanced enough where you could gain much by reprogramming. GM did not have many FI applications, GNX was one of the very few, and I'm pretty sure for that motor it was already pretty much at the maximum from the factory. In the 90ies many guys reprogrammed their modified GMs, but these were mostly NA V8 guys. A friend of mine for shts and giggles reprogrammed a rental Chevy to have something like 40mph speed limit.

Still, if you wanted these big old GM engine to produce respectable power at the top, you had to get more aggressive cams, and because of their nature they idled like crap and ran like crap in the low RPM range. Good for drag strip, but utterly useless for daily driving. Japanese motors with variable valve timing could do both.
That being said, I didn't know EPA mandated open ECU data? I've heard quite the opposite, at least from the Ford diesel guys - some of the data is now encrypted in order to prevent people from getting rid of cats, EGR and DPF systems.
The NA Supras (2JZ-GE) had a distributor. The turbos (2JZ-GTE) did not. Over time the GE also lost its distributor and gained VVTi. IMHO, the GE head has vastly superior ports and makes a better performance engine, but the GTEs got all the attention. Sort of....
GM always designs for stoplight to stoplight performance on their bread and butter cars. I had a crap GM X car (Citation) I got to keep miles off my Supra, and even that thing was pretty spunky from 0 - 40 because it was geared to get up to speed quickly. It's not a bad choice for the motoring public at all. If you want top end, then, yes, cams, porting, intake, exhaust all need to be looked at to shift the torque delivery to a higher rpm.
The EPA didn't mandate open ECU data. They mandated the OEMs provide the ability to reflash their ECUs to update the operating parameters in the event something happened after public release. The Supra was one of the players in this. The EPA discovered the Supra had a "test mode" that was invisibly invoked under dyno conditions producing very different results (read very compliant) than the program that was used in normal operation. They were pretty pissed off about this, so they mandated the ability to reflash ECUs where Toyota had chosen a zero chance of modification in the late 80's and early 90's to comply with EPA rules saying the code should not be alterable.
Celebrating Lexus & Toyota from Around the Globe
This looks to be Bensonhurst area of Brooklyn, NYC. Only a few miles from where I live, and my driveway isn't much wider than the one in the video.
Lol I was on the freeway last night and was forced to gun it to get into my lane and I had to step on it pretty hard, ended up at 100mph (not intentionally). The car I was passing trying to get ahead of was an old Buick Park Ave with a 3800. Haha.
The interstates here have all turned full nuclear, racetrack.













