Notices
Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova

2013 Honda Accord

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 7, 2012 | 10:00 AM
  #346  
Joeb427's Avatar
Joeb427
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 11,670
Likes: 20
From: SC
Default

Motor Trend and Car & Driver on the '13 Accord

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...rd_first_look/

http://www.caranddriver.com/news/201...-and-info-news
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2012 | 10:02 AM
  #347  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

There is currently a driving embargo until a later date.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2012 | 10:44 AM
  #348  
seanlee's Avatar
seanlee
Driver
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by BNR34
According to the report on the up and coming Honda's Hybrid SH-AWD system, the direct-injected variant of the 3.5-liter V6 will make 310 horsepower and 265 pound-feet of torque.

http://www.autoblog.com/2011/12/07/w...sh-awd-system/

The 278 hp V6 in this new Accord is just a slightly improved version of the old 271 hp V6 without DI.
while i am a big fan of the hybrid AWD system, the current J35 can make 286 HP (3rd TL-S), adding DI AND hybrid only increases 24 HP, while seems low.

HOWEVER, it might due to the fact that electric motor doesn't normally output much torque at higher RPM (where the peak HP is normally measured) so it is entirely possible the 24 HP may all due to the DI implementation.

what we should also see is the HUGE improvement of the MPG AND POWER even for the none DI version of the engine. .
the J35 in the current accord gives out 271 HP for 20MPG/30 MPG, with the weight of 3558 lb
the new accord gives out 286 for 21/34 MPG with the 3559 lb.

compare it to 2013 ES engine, which has produce 268 HP for 21/31 with weight 3549 lb. i really think Honda has gone above and beyond.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2012 | 02:09 PM
  #349  
jwong77's Avatar
jwong77
Pole Position
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,608
Likes: 40
From: CA
Default

I just saw one at a dealership earlier. The pictures really glamorize it too much, especially the interior. Its basically the same materials as the previous generation but in a better design. But the pictures on this thread make the interior alot better than what it really is. Not a bad effort, just not really that much better, if at all, than the competition. They had a 2012 Camry parked next to it for comparison.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2012 | 04:33 PM
  #350  
GSteg's Avatar
GSteg
Rookie
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 16,018
Likes: 81
From: CA
Default

isnt that the case with most press release photos? I dont expect material quality to be vastly different from the previous gen..after all, its not a luxury car.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2012 | 05:01 PM
  #351  
spwolf's Avatar
spwolf
Lexus Fanatic
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 20,238
Likes: 274
Default

Originally Posted by seanlee
while i am a big fan of the hybrid AWD system, the current J35 can make 286 HP (3rd TL-S), adding DI AND hybrid only increases 24 HP, while seems low.

HOWEVER, it might due to the fact that electric motor doesn't normally output much torque at higher RPM (where the peak HP is normally measured) so it is entirely possible the 24 HP may all due to the DI implementation.

what we should also see is the HUGE improvement of the MPG AND POWER even for the none DI version of the engine. .
the J35 in the current accord gives out 271 HP for 20MPG/30 MPG, with the weight of 3558 lb
the new accord gives out 286 for 21/34 MPG with the 3559 lb.

compare it to 2013 ES engine, which has produce 268 HP for 21/31 with weight 3549 lb. i really think Honda has gone above and beyond.
HWY numbers are due to the cylinder shut-off feature... we will see how it relates to real life.

Weight of Accord is nothing to brag about though - ES is more luxurious and larger size car, Camry XLE V6 is 3395 lbs, at least 165lbs less than Accord.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2012 | 08:35 PM
  #352  
seanlee's Avatar
seanlee
Driver
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by spwolf
HWY numbers are due to the cylinder shut-off feature... we will see how it relates to real life.

Weight of Accord is nothing to brag about though - ES is more luxurious and larger size car, Camry XLE V6 is 3395 lbs, at least 165lbs less than Accord.

man.. you lexus guys are way to aggressive, and way to subjective.
weight is nothing to brag about? it has everything to brag about for MPG and Engine tech. i point out the weight of Accord just to say the old accord and new accord has the same weight, yet the performance and MPG on the new accord is better. and i point out the ES as a EXAMPLE of NON DI engine to show how much Honda has improved and how does it compare to the competition.

did i suggest people cross shopping between ES and Accord? not a chance.

but since you brought out the Camry. the 2012 Camry V6 comes with 268 HP weights 3395 lb yet get 21/30 MPG. so it is lighter, lower in peak HP, yet about 4 MPG less on highway, does that satisfy you?
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2012 | 09:11 PM
  #353  
spwolf's Avatar
spwolf
Lexus Fanatic
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 20,238
Likes: 274
Default

Originally Posted by seanlee
man.. you lexus guys are way to aggressive, and way to subjective.
weight is nothing to brag about? it has everything to brag about for MPG and Engine tech. i point out the weight of Accord just to say the old accord and new accord has the same weight, yet the performance and MPG on the new accord is better. and i point out the ES as a EXAMPLE of NON DI engine to show how much Honda has improved and how does it compare to the competition.

did i suggest people cross shopping between ES and Accord? not a chance.

but since you brought out the Camry. the 2012 Camry V6 comes with 268 HP weights 3395 lb yet get 21/30 MPG. so it is lighter, lower in peak HP, yet about 4 MPG less on highway, does that satisfy you?
once again, it is due to the cylinder shut-off feature that reduces number of clynders in use to 3 from 6... Lets see what people get in real life, since previously these things didnt work so well.

BUT regardless of that, great job on V6.

However, the fact still is that Camry is 160lbs lighter even in its heaviest form (XLE), so whats there to brag about? Weight is going to suck real life mpg and performance out of any car.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2012 | 09:12 PM
  #354  
UDel's Avatar
UDel
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 12,269
Likes: 296
From: ------
Default

Originally Posted by seanlee
while i am a big fan of the hybrid AWD system, the current J35 can make 286 HP (3rd TL-S), adding DI AND hybrid only increases 24 HP, while seems low.

HOWEVER, it might due to the fact that electric motor doesn't normally output much torque at higher RPM (where the peak HP is normally measured) so it is entirely possible the 24 HP may all due to the DI implementation.
If you are talking about the Earth Dreams V6 engine going into the base RLX making 24 more hp it is not using hybrid power to make 310hp. The 310hp is what the base engine makes with DI but no hybrid. The hybrid setup will make much more hp then 310hp.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2012 | 11:29 PM
  #355  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Exclamation

Originally Posted by seanlee
man.. you lexus guys are way to aggressive, and way to subjective.
weight is nothing to brag about? it has everything to brag about for MPG and Engine tech. i point out the weight of Accord just to say the old accord and new accord has the same weight, yet the performance and MPG on the new accord is better. and i point out the ES as a EXAMPLE of NON DI engine to show how much Honda has improved and how does it compare to the competition.

did i suggest people cross shopping between ES and Accord? not a chance.

but since you brought out the Camry. the 2012 Camry V6 comes with 268 HP weights 3395 lb yet get 21/30 MPG. so it is lighter, lower in peak HP, yet about 4 MPG less on highway, does that satisfy you?
More like intelligent and not easily fooled. Thought let's not generalize one persons comments, he
Speaks for himself and no one else. Would you like the usual generalization of a dumb Honda ricer? No.

Not even sure why anyone is arguing about an accord. It's blah, there will be 9 trillion of them and they will sell well and surely be a damn good car.

We are Lexus owners with high expectations that's why we don't drive acuras
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2012 | 06:56 AM
  #356  
GS69's Avatar
GS69
Lead Lap
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,423
Likes: 10
From: NC
Exclamation Embargo Broken


Americans really like Honda Accords. Even with a new model just weeks away from showrooms, more retail buyers took delivery of new Accords last month than any other car in the country.

So it's safe to say that expectations are pretty high for the redesigned Accord you see here, a more-than-meets-the-eye rethink that brings with it a degree of innovation we haven't seen out of Honda in a while.


For 1, value is finally part of the deal. Once-stingy Honda is now including alloy wheels, dual-zone automatic climate control, Bluetooth and a high-resolution 8-inch screen with a backup camera as standard on the entry-level $21,680 Accord LX. Clearly, change as afloat at an automaker that made buyers pay extra for air conditioning and a radio just a few short years ago.

This reinvigoration extends beyond just “on paper” changes. Although the 2013 Accord might have the same overall shape as its predecessor, the 2 are substantially different in person. A simpler, more elegant design permeates the Accord both inside and out, and even though the look isn't wholly original – we see lots of Hyundai Genesis, for example – it is far more cohesive than before.


Underneath, Accord now stretches more than 2 and a half inches shorter, a welcome change since the outgoing model was nearly a full-size sedan. In addition, the double wishbone front suspension setup has been shelved in favor of a more sophisticated MacPherson strut setup.

In the engine room, Accord ditches its outgoing motors in favor of 2 all-new units and 1 that has been thoroughly revised.


Most Accords will be motivated by a new 2.4-liter 4-cylinder developed under Honda's new “Earth Dreams” eco-friendly engine program. With direct injection and Honda's VTEC variable valve timing system, the 2.4 puts out 185 horsepower and 181 lb-ft. of torque. A new Sport trim level adds dual exhaust for an extra 4 ponies.

Eschewing a trend away from manuals, a 6-speed stick shift is standard, while an all-new CVT (with paddle shifters on Sports) is optional.


The CVT/4-cylinder model is rated by the EPA at 27/36 mpg, which is impressive but still trails the 38 mpg Nissan Altima overall.

Upmarket Accords offer a revised 3.5-liter V6 that, with the new addition of VTEC and a carryover cylinder deactivation system, cranks out 278 horsepower and 252 lb-ft. of torque. The V6 is mated only to a 6-speed automatic in sedans, but the coupe offers a 6-speed manual.That cylinder deactivation system reaps rewards on the highway, where the sedan is rated at 34 mpg. City consumption, at 21 mpg, is more V6-typical.


Exclusive to sedans is a new plug-in hybrid powertrain for the late-introduction Accord PHEV. Capable of motivating the Accord on solely electric power for around 10-15 miles, the hybrid is actually reasonably peppy at 196 horsepower and 226 lb-ft. from a combination of gas and electric motivation powering a CVT. EPA figures for the Accord PHEV are due out closer to its on-sale date early next year.

The Accord PHEV's battery takes up a good deal of its trunk space, though a quick charging system means the battery is full in less time than it takes to enjoy lunch as long as the sedan is plugged into a 240V outlet.


A bevvy of Accord trim levels are on offer, but we think the entry-level LX ($21,680) and step above Sport ($23,390) (which adds 18-inch alloy wheels, a dual exhaust and a few leather bits inside, but no chassis changes) represent the Accord's high-value sweet spot. On those models, selecting the CVT adds $800. Notably, navigation is not available until you step up to the $29,995 EX-L with navigation model.

Inner trappings


This latest Accord might not set the standard for style in the segment the way the Kia Optima does, but its cabin is undeniably a comfortable place to whittle away the miles.

Accord's interior is fresh and upmarket, with the new screen mounted high on the dashboard commanding the most attention. That screen's presence clears up the button-heavy dashboard of the outgoing Accord. Further improving matters is a general upgrade in materials quality throughout. Our only kvetch is that we would like to see more than 2 interior shades on offer.


Higher-trim versions with a new HondaLink infotainment system have a second, smaller touchscreen mounted on the center of the dashboard (which is pictured in the photo gallery), where it is framed by a metallic gloss black panel. Generally, the system is intuitive, but we would have preferred traditional switches for commonly-used functions like radio presets. At least Bluetooth pairing was a cinch.

Accord's excellent packaging was retained, meaning the new car has more usable space than its predecessor despite the smaller overall dimensions.

On the road


Accords have long been notable for their slightly more enthusiast-oriented driving dynamics and this latest model appears to continue that tradition.

Firm but nonetheless compliant suspension tuning and higher-effort electric power steering impart a feeling of confidence on the road lacking in softer or less precise rivals like the Hyundai Sonata and Chevrolet Malibu. Though the steering is a little dead right on center, effort builds predictably and, ultimately, the Accord proved a delight to toss around the curvy roads we encountered outside of Santa Barbara, California.


The 6-speed manual will account for a low take rate, and that's a shame since it could set the standard for the segment. Luckily, the CVT isn't a bad companion either. Set to become Honda's highest volume CVT ever, this unit did its best to keep the Accord within its power band without the elastic feel that plagued some earlier units by other automakers. We're still not used to the concept of not feeling shifts, but this ranks up there with the Nissan Altima's unit as 1 of the best efforts in the industry.

Power comes on strong and buttery smooth with either engine, but we did notice a bit more thrum at idle than we expected with the 2.4-liter. The V6 remains robust and torquey, not to mention a bit more refined than before. Similarly, the extra cog in the V6's conventional transmission made this a stellar combination. Our time in a V6/6-speed manual coupe was limited, but we found it to be capable if considerably less sporty than the 2 door proportions might suggest.


We also didn't get much seat time in the Accord PHEV. What little driving experience we did have showed it to be a robust performer. Notably, the PHEV has a steering wheel-mounted button to allow drivers to decide just when they want to use only battery power. In other words, drivers can use EV mode around town, where they'll get more miles out of it, and stick in normal hybrid mode otherwise.

EX ($24,405) and above models – that's 1 step above Sport – include an all-new blind spot monitoring system dubbed LaneWatch that, instead of flashing orange lights to warn drivers, uses a camera integrated into the passenger-side outside mirror. When a driver signals that he wants to turn right, the camera fires up and displays a live image of the blind spot in the upper dashboard screen. The camera can also be kept on at all times, presumably for passenger amusement. While there's undoubtedly some value in this system to salespeople looking to close a deal, we think a radar-based system with flashing lights is far less distracting.

Still, it's that kind of outside-of-the-box thinking that catapulted Honda to the top years ago – and it's finally back all throughout the 2013 Accord.


Leftlane's bottom line

After the disappointingly redesigned Civic arrived last year, we were prepared for the worst with this latest Accord. Fortunately, Honda has done more than just assuage our concerns: It has built a genuinely good vehicle that very well might put Honda at the top of its class.

Substantially upgraded inside, outside and underneath, the 2013 Accord pushes all the right buttons, especially in its new high-value lower specification models.

2013 Honda Accord sedan base price, range, $21,680 to $33,430.

Reply
Old Sep 8, 2012 | 08:10 AM
  #357  
GSteg's Avatar
GSteg
Rookie
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 16,018
Likes: 81
From: CA
Default

I feel bad for my friend's sister who recently bought 2012 Accord SE sedan. Should have waited for the 2013 instead. Even the base model has an impressive list of standard feature
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2012 | 09:30 AM
  #358  
LeX2K's Avatar
LeX2K
Lexus Fanatic
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 26,025
Likes: 4,320
From: Alberta
Default

In addition, the double wishbone front suspension setup has been shelved in favor of a more sophisticated MacPherson strut setup.
Huh?
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2012 | 11:44 AM
  #359  
GSteg's Avatar
GSteg
Rookie
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 16,018
Likes: 81
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by Lexus2000
Huh?
It's true.. for a car like an Accord, a McPherson strut setup makes more sense. A "great" McPherson design will outperform a "good-enough" double wishbone suspension (see M3, Porsche 911, etc). I'm glad Honda ditched the setup because it means more money will be put into places where it matters more, like standard features. The average driver will not care or know the difference between the two suspension.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2012 | 12:01 PM
  #360  
doublehh03's Avatar
doublehh03
Pole Position
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by GSteg
It's true.. for a car like an Accord, a McPherson strut setup makes more sense. A "great" McPherson design will outperform a "good-enough" double wishbone suspension (see M3, Porsche 911, etc). I'm glad Honda ditched the setup because it means more money will be put into places where it matters more, like standard features. The average driver will not care or know the difference between the two suspension.
That's the main reason why Honda ditched the DWB setup. Now people who buy the LX who feel like they didn't get enough. The enthusiasts will dislike the change, but this is a car for the masses, not for the hardcore enthusiasts, and even them have been complaining about the lack of features.

This is EASILY the best Accord since 1997. Now let's see what Honda does with the upcoming redesigns for the Fit/Pilot, and we'll see if Honda is truly on their way back. It's a good start.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:28 PM.