The Corvette Plant has been shut down.
the current trend is trying to get the highest power and torque out of an engine, without improving the other critical areas.
Highest power/torque does always not mean FASTEST car, or MOST ENJOYABLE car.
I think there are much more areas, like handling, reducing the weight, trying to improve fuel consumption, etc... that can be improved.
Just increasing the power on a car without doing the rest is just too easy ...
Highest power/torque does always not mean FASTEST car, or MOST ENJOYABLE car.
I think there are much more areas, like handling, reducing the weight, trying to improve fuel consumption, etc... that can be improved.
Just increasing the power on a car without doing the rest is just too easy ...
Yeah, so remember the other thread we had a while back with people talking about how great the new Vette is?
Well, what do you say now? Don't tell me it's a normal thing to completely shut down a production line, and don't tell me that it's indicative of a great car, either.
OWN3D.
Well, what do you say now? Don't tell me it's a normal thing to completely shut down a production line, and don't tell me that it's indicative of a great car, either.
OWN3D.
Originally posted by HKGS300
I think there are much more areas, like handling, reducing the weight, trying to improve fuel consumption, etc... that can be improved.
Just increasing the power on a car without doing the rest is just too easy ...
I think there are much more areas, like handling, reducing the weight, trying to improve fuel consumption, etc... that can be improved.
Just increasing the power on a car without doing the rest is just too easy ...
Wantanewlex,
It's shameful they have to do this, and it's embarassing that this happened, especially for me because I've been one of the Vette praisers for as long as I've been on this board. I don't think that one tranny failure totally destroys this car however. Yes it's bad and I'm NOT excusing it, but like said before, the freakin' LS had to have trannys replaced and I didn't hardly hear a peep out of anyone here. Are TLs and Accords bad cars because of their tranny issue? I believe it's your sooby tranny that kinda has a rep for being made of glass right?
Engines and engine numbers sell cars. ALL car companies need to look at all aspects of the powertrain when beefing up power. MB couldn't use their brand new 7 series on the new AMGs because they couldn't handle the torque. In C&Ds Supercar shootout, a CL55 with just a little more boost had the 5 spd tranny crap out on it. Nothing's bulletproof.
James
Last edited by jet864; Oct 9, 2004 at 08:55 PM.
Keep in mind that the Bowling Green plant is not only the home of Corvettes now, but the Cadillac XLR roadster as well, which is built on the same platform. This may or may not affect the Cadillac transmissions, which are set up to be comewhat different from the 'Vette trannies....smoother shifts, quieter operation, wider ratios, etc...... They also are hooked to a special longitudinally-mounted 320 HP Northstar rather than the Corvette LS1 / LS2 5.7L.
Originally posted by jet864
Wantanewlex,
It's shameful they have to do this, and it's embarassing that this happened, especially for me because I've been one of the Vette praisers for as long as I've been on this board. I don't think that one tranny failure totally destroys this car however. Yes it's bad and I'm NOT excusing it, but like said before, the freakin' LS had to have trannys replaced and I didn't hardly hear a peep out of anyone here. Are TLs and Accords bad cars because of their tranny issue? I believe it's your sooby tranny that kinda has a rep for being made of glass right?
James
Wantanewlex,
It's shameful they have to do this, and it's embarassing that this happened, especially for me because I've been one of the Vette praisers for as long as I've been on this board. I don't think that one tranny failure totally destroys this car however. Yes it's bad and I'm NOT excusing it, but like said before, the freakin' LS had to have trannys replaced and I didn't hardly hear a peep out of anyone here. Are TLs and Accords bad cars because of their tranny issue? I believe it's your sooby tranny that kinda has a rep for being made of glass right?
James
Yes, some of the WRX 5-speeds are weaksauce. This problem as been corrected for late '04 and '05 models, and the WRX, XT models, and new Legacies are using reinforced transmissions. Not a complete solution, but nothing much to worry about.
Also, there's a difference between losing some teeth or a gear, and having the car simply decide to pop out of gear while in motion.
Additionally, my car did not cost $40K, and is not touted as the supreme American sports car.
They raise expectations that high, and they deserve to be brought to their knees by something like this.
Last edited by SecPole14; Oct 10, 2004 at 10:07 AM.
Well, it shows here that maybe GM is finally getting more careful about how it puts their cars together. Like some Chrysler products, they have a long history of weak transmissions.....from the practice in the late 1970's and early 80's of using 6-cylinder trannies on V8's to try and save money, to the awkward and unreliable X-car trannies, to the recent CVT's on Saturns that have not held up, and many other instances. It will be interesting to see how Bob Lutz handles this as GM's top exec....he has a reputation of being a no-nonsense guy, and was a big proponent of the new Cadillac XLR roadster....which is built in the same plant.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by mmarshall
Well, it shows here that maybe GM is finally getting more careful about how it puts their cars together. Like some Chrysler products, they have a long history of weak transmissions.....from the practice in the late 1970's and early 80's of using 6-cylinder trannies on V8's to try and save money, to the awkward and unreliable X-car trannies, to the recent CVT's on Saturns that have not held up, and many other instances. It will be interesting to see how Bob Lutz handles this as GM's top exec....he has a reputation of being a no-nonsense guy, and was a big proponent of the new Cadillac XLR roadster....which is built in the same plant.
Well, it shows here that maybe GM is finally getting more careful about how it puts their cars together. Like some Chrysler products, they have a long history of weak transmissions.....from the practice in the late 1970's and early 80's of using 6-cylinder trannies on V8's to try and save money, to the awkward and unreliable X-car trannies, to the recent CVT's on Saturns that have not held up, and many other instances. It will be interesting to see how Bob Lutz handles this as GM's top exec....he has a reputation of being a no-nonsense guy, and was a big proponent of the new Cadillac XLR roadster....which is built in the same plant.
Guys
Let's try a different approach here. Is there not a chance that in the old days, the plant would have kept running until they found the issue? Maybe, just maybe, GM has got its act together and wants these cars to be right - so they took the unusual step of shutting it down, cost be damned, to get the issue fixed.
I'm betting this happens a lot more than we know of - but you probably don't hear about it. I assure you that if it happened on the line that builds any Lexus we would not hear about it.
Let's try a different approach here. Is there not a chance that in the old days, the plant would have kept running until they found the issue? Maybe, just maybe, GM has got its act together and wants these cars to be right - so they took the unusual step of shutting it down, cost be damned, to get the issue fixed.
I'm betting this happens a lot more than we know of - but you probably don't hear about it. I assure you that if it happened on the line that builds any Lexus we would not hear about it.
Originally posted by doug_999
Guys
Let's try a different approach here. Is there not a chance that in the old days, the plant would have kept running until they found the issue? Maybe, just maybe, GM has got its act together and wants these cars to be right - so they took the unusual step of shutting it down, cost be damned, to get the issue fixed.
I'm betting this happens a lot more than we know of - but you probably don't hear about it. I assure you that if it happened on the line that builds any Lexus we would not hear about it.
Guys
Let's try a different approach here. Is there not a chance that in the old days, the plant would have kept running until they found the issue? Maybe, just maybe, GM has got its act together and wants these cars to be right - so they took the unusual step of shutting it down, cost be damned, to get the issue fixed.
I'm betting this happens a lot more than we know of - but you probably don't hear about it. I assure you that if it happened on the line that builds any Lexus we would not hear about it.
Well, Jim, things are occasionally going to happen. Today's cars are complex, and the plants that build them have to be even more complex. What is remarkable is that today's cars, with a couple of exceptions, are as reliable as they are, given their huge complexity....and it seems that the more complex they become, the better they get.
The one MAJOR recent exception, of course, has been Mercedes-Benz. Their cars have been going downhill for years.
The one MAJOR recent exception, of course, has been Mercedes-Benz. Their cars have been going downhill for years.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
I8ABMR
Car Chat
65
Oct 15, 2009 02:01 PM








