Notices
Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova

General EV Conversation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 20, 2024 | 08:32 AM
  #1321  
Bob04's Avatar
Bob04
Lead Lap
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,541
Likes: 663
From: SC
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
Your entire point of comparing it to the LS500 lol.
At least Lexus got close to their goals of 12,000 a year before cutting production. Hopefully they didn't lose $36k on each car while doing it.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2024 | 08:33 AM
  #1322  
DaveGS4's Avatar
DaveGS4
Administrator Emeritus
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 31,944
Likes: 2,737
From: North Carolina
Default

This is not an LS500 thread. You both have made your perspectives known about your thoughts on that model dozens, probably hundreds of times.

Please drop it and move on.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2024 | 08:35 AM
  #1323  
SW17LS's Avatar
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
Active Streak: 60 Days
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 68,762
Likes: 4,081
From: Maryland
Default

Everybody who makes EVs are going to lose a ton per car right now because the technology is so new, that’s just the way it is when you have invested so much into developing an entirely new method of propulsion for your brand. Over time those investments will be better capitalized across model ranges and units sold and the profitability per unit will be there.

Last edited by DaveGS4; Jan 20, 2024 at 08:40 AM. Reason: Moving on
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2024 | 09:09 AM
  #1324  
Bob04's Avatar
Bob04
Lead Lap
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,541
Likes: 663
From: SC
Default

They are eliminating 2 of their 3 production crews for the Lightning. No other way to see that as anything other than a complete disaster.

Last edited by Bob04; Jan 20, 2024 at 09:14 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2024 | 09:32 AM
  #1325  
Bob04's Avatar
Bob04
Lead Lap
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,541
Likes: 663
From: SC
Default

So, they said they were going to produce 3200 per week. With 3 shifts, that 1066 per week per shift. In 2023, they sold 24,165 Lightnings. That's 465 per week. They are literally selling at less than half the capacity of one shift. And yes, sales are up, but up from nothing to next to nothing is meaningless when you are promising a number 7 times that amount.

I bet they really want to kill it completely, but can't due to reasons we aren't allowed to discuss here.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2024 | 09:34 AM
  #1326  
Allen K's Avatar
Allen K
-0----0-
CL Folding 25,000
15 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 10,230
Likes: 1,196
From: NJ
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
ford doesn't have sugar daddy saudi's allowing them to lose tens of thousands per vehicle.
the rivian right now might be the biggest bargain ever (because it's massively subsidized and sold at a huge loss), but the company is almost worthless.
ford just isn't willing (or probably able) to sustain those kind of losses.
Rivians are being sold for a loss because they're still ramping up and are on track to be profitable by Q4 2024. They reduced their loss per vehicle from $124K to about $33K in Q4. Add in the design changes they're making to the production line later this year and they'll be okay this year. I wouldn't expect much in profits until Georgia is up and running and they introduce an R2 line

Tesla wasn't reliably profitable until the 3 left production hell and has been doing great since the Y
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2024 | 09:36 AM
  #1327  
swajames's Avatar
swajames
Lead Lap
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,991
Likes: 1,616
From: San Diego, CA
Default

So this is the same thing that was discussed in December, the difference being this time there was a public release, the December news was from non-public announcements made to dealers about this specific change. It's as it was then. A smaller increase, not a cut. The Lightning had another over 4000 sales month in December and ended the year and quarter up 60% and over 70%, and remember there were production and sales stops for a few months last year. Regardless, I understand the Lightning was the best selling EV truck last year despite the production delays. So old news really. The same thing we discussed last month.

Last edited by swajames; Jan 20, 2024 at 09:44 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2024 | 09:44 AM
  #1328  
SW17LS's Avatar
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
Active Streak: 60 Days
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 68,762
Likes: 4,081
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by Bob04
So, they said they were going to produce 3200 per week. With 3 shifts, that 1066 per week per shift. In 2023, they sold 24,165 Lightnings. That's 465 per week. They are literally selling at less than half the capacity of one shift. And yes, sales are up, but up from nothing to next to nothing is meaningless when you are promising a number 7 times that amount.

I bet they really want to kill it completely, but can't due to reasons we aren't allowed to discuss here.
This is your bias talking. They way over estimated the demand but that does not mean it’s a “total disaster”. They are still planning on building more Lightnings in 2024 than the built in 2023, demand and sales are growing just not at the pace they thought they would be.

You hate EVs and you want them to fail, but they’re not failing they are growing, market share is up YoY for EVs nationwide by nearly 50%.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2024 | 09:51 AM
  #1329  
Bob04's Avatar
Bob04
Lead Lap
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,541
Likes: 663
From: SC
Default

A "smaller increase" than promised to the business world is a cut. Production isn't just about right now. It's planned months or years in advance. Once you come out and tell the world that you are going to produce X amount of something, anything less than that is a cut. And to deliver only about 15% of what is promised this many months in isn't just a cut, it's a butchering.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2024 | 09:56 AM
  #1330  
swajames's Avatar
swajames
Lead Lap
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,991
Likes: 1,616
From: San Diego, CA
Default

maybe best to just admit you hadn't realized that this is the same thing that we all discussed last month?
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2024 | 09:56 AM
  #1331  
SW17LS's Avatar
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
Active Streak: 60 Days
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 68,762
Likes: 4,081
From: Maryland
Default

Sometimes companies overshoot what their projected demand is going to be, in a burgeoning market it’s easy to do that.

If sales weren’t still growing then your point of this as a failure would make sense, but they are still growing…and it doesn’t make sense.

Growth does not equal failure.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2024 | 09:57 AM
  #1332  
SW17LS's Avatar
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
Active Streak: 60 Days
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 68,762
Likes: 4,081
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by swajames
maybe best to just admit you hadn't realized that this is the same thing that we all discussed last month?
Never gonna happen lol
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2024 | 10:08 AM
  #1333  
Bob04's Avatar
Bob04
Lead Lap
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,541
Likes: 663
From: SC
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
This is your bias talking. They way over estimated the demand but that does not mean it’s a “total disaster”. They are still planning on building more Lightnings in 2024 than the built in 2023, demand and sales are growing just not at the pace they thought they would be.

You hate EVs and you want them to fail, but they’re not failing they are growing, market share is up YoY for EVs nationwide by nearly 50%.
Has nothing to do with hate or love. Just math. Any vehicles that delivers less than 15% of the expected sales is a disaster. I call them like I see them.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2024 | 10:09 AM
  #1334  
SW17LS's Avatar
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
Active Streak: 60 Days
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 68,762
Likes: 4,081
From: Maryland
Default

You can believe what you like
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2024 | 10:09 AM
  #1335  
Margate330's Avatar
Margate330
Lexus Champion
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 11,256
Likes: 1,598
From: FL
Default

If sales are down this year, production has been clearly cut.

If sales don't meet expectations, might have to trim the trained staff to keep costs inline.

We see this all the time with big companies closing locations or cutting staff.

I don't know, just ideas. 🤖
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:41 PM.