RC F (2015-present) Discussion topics related to the RC F model

Modified 2UR-GSE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-03-16, 09:58 AM
  #1  
LDEUX
Rookie
Thread Starter
 
LDEUX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: CA
Posts: 85
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Modified 2UR-GSE

Check out this modded 2UR-GSE block that the LC 500, GS-F and RC-F share:


Highlights from the mod:
  • Increased Bore Size from 94mm to 99.5 mm
  • Increased Displacement from 4,969 cc (5.0L) to 5,569 (5.6L)
  • Power increased from 467hp to 525hp
  • Torque increased from 391 lb.-ft. to 440 lb.-ft.
Good to see more and more aftermarket shops modding the engine without forced induction.
I think it's a very capable machine especially with all the advancements Lexus put into it (e.g. direct-injection, dual VVT-i and VVTiE camshaft actuation).

Check out the whole article here.

Last edited by LDEUX; 11-03-16 at 03:41 PM.
Old 11-03-16, 10:38 AM
  #2  
Carnevino
Advanced
 
Carnevino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Fl
Posts: 650
Received 162 Likes on 90 Posts
Default

Pretty cool! Just add a set of Sikky headers to the RCF and you'll get the same gains
Old 11-03-16, 11:43 AM
  #3  
SmurFPwr
Driver
 
SmurFPwr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: texas
Posts: 130
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

i wonder why they did carrillo rods and a copper o-ring on the block just for 58hp more of gain unless they have plans to shove some air down that intake lol
Old 11-03-16, 01:42 PM
  #4  
SmurFPwr
Driver
 
SmurFPwr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: texas
Posts: 130
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Well yeah price is definitely going up but the factory rods are forged so to increase hp only 58hp (< 8hp extra per rod) that's pointless unless this build has bigger plans. Which is why I assume they are planning to go forced induction once they discover their way into that ecu. Same reason you do copper o-rings for big turbo builds so you don't blow a head gasket.
Old 11-03-16, 01:54 PM
  #5  
FR500GT
Lead Lap
iTrader: (7)
 
FR500GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: CA
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

My exhaust guy worked on that car!
Old 11-03-16, 03:19 PM
  #6  
Davew77
Lead Lap
 
Davew77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Naples, FL
Posts: 750
Received 59 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LDEUX
Good to see that someone finally started to test the limits of the engine.
The GT3 is putting out more power on this block, 560 bhp IIRC. I wouldn't consider 525 bhp to be testing the limits of the engine. RR Racing is supposed to be testing a supercharger right now and they are projecting ~510-520 whp which translates to ~600 bhp and I wouldn't really consider that to be testing the limits of this engine either. I would consider that to be a conservative test of their FI system and tune.

Originally Posted by SmurFPwr
Well yeah price is definitely going up but the factory rods are forged so to increase hp only 58hp (< 8hp extra per rod) that's pointless unless this build has bigger plans. Which is why I assume they are planning to go forced induction once they discover their way into that ecu. Same reason you do copper o-rings for big turbo builds so you don't blow a head gasket.
This. Boring out the cylinders is expensive. It requires rebuilding the engine, which is what has to be done to replace the internals. The RC F internals are already forged, which is why it is a good platform for FI since it doesn't require a rebuild. You rebuild engines for 1000+ whp, not 525 bhp... But if someone likes wasting money, who am I to say anything? It's probably for bigger plans...

Last edited by Davew77; 11-03-16 at 03:38 PM.
Old 11-03-16, 03:50 PM
  #7  
LDEUX
Rookie
Thread Starter
 
LDEUX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: CA
Posts: 85
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Davew77
The GT3 is putting out more power on this block, 560 bhp IIRC. I wouldn't consider 525 bhp to be testing the limits of the engine. RR Racing is supposed to be testing a supercharger right now and they are projecting ~510-520 whp which translates to ~600 bhp and I wouldn't really consider that to be testing the limits of this engine either. I would consider that to be a conservative test of their FI system and tune.
You're right.

Don't know about you but I'd like to keep my RC-F NA, so I was excited to see a power/torque mod on the block that didn't introduce FI. If I did do FI it would be TC not SC, that whine wouldn't fit the RC-F IMO.
Old 11-04-16, 05:27 AM
  #8  
JT2MA71
Moderator
iTrader: (7)
 
JT2MA71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: WA
Posts: 2,371
Received 1,518 Likes on 659 Posts
Default

I wonder how they're running it with the changed VE, piggyback ecu? standalone?
Old 03-18-17, 01:45 PM
  #9  
SmurFPwr
Driver
 
SmurFPwr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: texas
Posts: 130
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JT2MA71
I wonder how they're running it with the changed VE, piggyback ecu? standalone?
my guess would be its still on the factory ecu. i know on n/a Porsche engines the factory ecu will learn and adjust for the increase in bore/stroke when we go from 3.4 to 3.6/. But if this car ever goes turbo and they decide to test their theory on how much power this block will hold they will need standalone
Old 03-19-17, 06:34 AM
  #10  
finny76
Advanced
 
finny76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: DFW
Posts: 627
Received 81 Likes on 54 Posts
Default RCF Torque

The RCF def needs more Torque, and a 49~50 gain would be noticeable.
Old 03-19-17, 10:16 AM
  #11  
paulwall4
Lead Lap
iTrader: (1)
 
paulwall4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: San Fernando Valley, California
Posts: 440
Received 49 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

The videos numbers were not accurate at all smh
Old 03-20-17, 05:19 PM
  #12  
SRTISF
Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
SRTISF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: California
Posts: 171
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I want to see a built block like this with a set of ITB's. Between headers and ITB's that would make this engine so rev happy and hopefully increase low end torque pretty significantly.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zoolander
Performance
9
10-29-15 03:59 PM
Joss350
Performance
13
11-14-12 08:03 AM
BloodlineX
IS - 1st Gen (2001-2005)
5
01-16-12 09:38 AM
greyBLITZ
Car Chat
6
12-01-07 07:12 AM
relapse
SC- 1st Gen (1992-2000)
3
04-21-01 04:21 PM



Quick Reply: Modified 2UR-GSE



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:26 AM.