Lexus Liability
We all know that they exist - cars don't sit level, right rear air shocks fail, and Lexus refuses to acknowledge any problem nor do anything about it.
Acura lost a class action suit regarding the poor tire wear on the NSX. They settled it by offering free tires for the life of the car while the orig. owner had the car. I don't offer this as an equivocation, but rather to show that car manufacturers have lost suits based on lesser issues.
The more I think about this problem, and the Lexus rep telling me that there is nothing wrong with my Ultra, the angrier I get.
Did you ever hire an attorney to handle your class action lawsuit? With Toyota now coming under fire about other issues, I'm wondering how many Lexus problems should have actually been a recall. Have they just been hiding from the truth?
It's not like the sludge issue of the 3.0L V-6 engines in the Camry, RX300, etc. which was an obvious flaw that impacted the operation of the vehicle.
It's not like the sludge issue of the 3.0L V-6 engines in the Camry, RX300, etc. which was an obvious flaw that impacted the operation of the vehicle.
Trending Topics
Anyway, I'm not an UL owner, so don't affect me...
Actually the air was one of the reasons I kind of stayed away from the UL. Didn't think it would last very long even without the "issue" noted, and I had no use for the rear entertainment extras as I have three child seats in the back.
Celebrating Lexus & Toyota from Around the Globe

From an owners standpoint, most would agree if it had a pattern of failure before an "unreasonable" amount of time or mileage (REGARDLESS if it's in/out of warranty), then yes...it's premature.
If you're the manufacturer, your perspective (probably even for Lexus) would include: Is the vehicle still within it's warranty period? If not, then sorry, nothing we can do about it/no goodwill.
Ahhh...but then again, there's those darn italics and quotes again around the word unreasonable.
Hypothetically----what if a high percentage of UL owners (~40%) see failures ~45,000 miles or ~5.5 years?
What would your take be, regarding Lexus' obligations, if any?
Last edited by LS430inDE.; Feb 19, 2010 at 10:11 PM.
From an owners standpoint, most would agree if it had a pattern of failure before an "unreasonable" amount of time or mileage (REGARDLESS if it's in/out of warranty), then yes...it's premature.
If you're the manufacturer, your perspective (probably even for Lexus) would include: Is the vehicle still within it's warranty period? If not, then sorry, nothing we can do about it/no goodwill.
Ahhh...but then again, there's those darn italics and quotes again around the word unreasonable.
What would your take be, regarding Lexus' obligations, if any?
It was the buyers choice to buy this option to begin with. Considering that many of us are second hand owners, i dont frankly think Lexus will do much anyways.
Mercedes owners have been crying for years over costly A/S systems and no one moved an eye lash in the German corporate office.











