LScowboyLS

the only unbiased large scale oil filter test ever done was by Consumer Reports many years ago

in that test FRAM kicked all other's *** on trapping the size range of particles that cause engine wear!

therefore these days I using a FRAM Ultra in my LS400

RA40

iTrader: (6)

These have done well and I have one unopened box left. Ive dropped the intervals down to 7,500 because pushing the oil isn't worth it. With the filters on hand, that puts the car at about 9 more years of driving and ~300K miles.

PureDrifter

iTrader: (10)

link to the results? Note everyone else has been providing data. Also, when was this study? Fram (and every other maker) changes their lineup and construction almost every year-2 years. Right now many of their filters have cardboard in them.

BITOG has actual testing results, hence I stick to Napa (Wix).

Shiryo

I hear Wix makes Napa's filters, so that's where I get my filters from. Standard ones at $4/ea and Gold series at $9/ea.

PureDrifter

iTrader: (10)

If you hunt around at different napas, you can get the gold for nearly half that. Don't think i've ever paid more than $5-6 for mine

Shiryo

I wish I could, but the next closest one to me is 13 miles out and charging the same price...

RA40

iTrader: (6)

Given the choice of the old 90915 and current Napa/Wix any preference?

python

iTrader: (4)

fram is the worst on the market...hastings..purolator and wix are the top 3. baldwin makes a good filter as well
fram does however make good ecu caps