Notices
IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013) Discussion about the 2006+ model IS models

PWR button on or off?! ( I've searched!)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 11, 2012 | 07:58 PM
  #16  
Hoovey689's Avatar
Hoovey689
2UR-GSE Owner
15 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 42,476
Likes: 321
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by Slammer1
I have had mine in this mode for about the last six months. I LOVE it, and haven't seen a change in gas mileage (good or bad). I find that the car is more responsive, and really like that it holds gears longer and downshifts when I slow rapidly. I really don't see any reason to turn this option off....
as some have mentioned. ECT PWR is no good in traffic. Makes the car too jumpy
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2012 | 08:41 PM
  #17  
knguyenk's Avatar
knguyenk
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 427
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Default

I personally keep that off, since I noticed that I use more of the power band of the IS in Normal mode (which means I can go faster and make good use of the torque). People that don't see any change in MPG between Normal mode and PWR mode have more than likely reconditioned their throttle input with their foot to the pedal to account for the "increased responsiveness" that they perceive.

From what I recall reading the forum threads, the IS transmission is off of a Toyota Tacoma. Which leads me to think that the "quick shifting" is nothing more than a placebo, a perception of what we think should happen.

Last edited by knguyenk; Dec 11, 2012 at 08:42 PM. Reason: Fixing grammatical errors.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2012 | 09:09 PM
  #18  
nosurprise's Avatar
nosurprise
Racer
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,924
Likes: 85
From: AZ
Default

um, I'm not sure if anyone mentioned quick shifting. Anyways, I used the power mode a few times, it does just what everyone says, it stays in lower gear longer so the RPM is higher (keeps around 5000RPM), so the engine is louder. I assume this uses more gas, but never really check since I don't use it that often.

One other thing that I notice that's not engine related is that the gas pedal is easier to press.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2012 | 09:55 PM
  #19  
Hoovey689's Avatar
Hoovey689
2UR-GSE Owner
15 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 42,476
Likes: 321
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by knguyenk
I personally keep that off, since I noticed that I use more of the power band of the IS in Normal mode (which means I can go faster and make good use of the torque). People that don't see any change in MPG between Normal mode and PWR mode have more than likely reconditioned their throttle input with their foot to the pedal to account for the "increased responsiveness" that they perceive.

From what I recall reading the forum threads, the IS transmission is off of a Toyota Tacoma. Which leads me to think that the "quick shifting" is nothing more than a placebo, a perception of what we think should happen.
The 6-Speed Manual is. Not the automatic. Tacoma isn't even offered in a 6A
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2012 | 07:55 PM
  #20  
Slammer1's Avatar
Slammer1
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 3
From: NC
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411
as some have mentioned. ECT PWR is no good in traffic. Makes the car too jumpy
Most of my driving is highway. If I do take the "city" route to work, I don't hit more than five lights. Really not an issue for me but I suppose everyone's situation is different.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2012 | 08:28 PM
  #21  
jsmacks's Avatar
jsmacks
Intermediate
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 460
Likes: 7
From: Kailua, HI
Default

I've started calling it the "As**ole Button".. because its perfect for when I feel like driving like one.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2012 | 08:32 PM
  #22  
Slammer1's Avatar
Slammer1
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 3
From: NC
Default

Originally Posted by jsmacks
I've started calling it the "As**ole Button".. because its perfect for when I feel like driving like one.
Well said, and quite appropriate indeed.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2012 | 09:06 PM
  #23  
jgr7's Avatar
jgr7
Lexus Test Driver
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 957
Likes: 2
From: Nampa, Idaho
Default

Originally Posted by Kurtz
There's no evidence that PWR shifts "faster" but there IS evidence it shifts at a lower RPM when going WOT from a stop.

Which means it spends less time in each lower gear, meaning the car is slower in a race.






That would be physically impossible. The limit on how short/fast the car can stop is the tires... which the ECT switch has no impact on.

It might stop it with less brake input when not braking hard at all, but if you slam the brake pedal it'll stop in the same distance in any transmission mode.
I'm not talking about slamming the brakes on, just having to make an unanticipated stop, the multiple downshifts brings the speed down faster than with out the multiple downshifts. I drive in commute traffic and have noticed this often. The same principle as downshifting with a manual as opposed to just pushing in the clutch when making a quick reduction of speed. The transmission is not doing this to help me stop better but in anticipation of acceleration it is putting the transmission in a lower gear for quicker response.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2012 | 10:38 PM
  #24  
knguyenk's Avatar
knguyenk
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 427
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411
The 6-Speed Manual is. Not the automatic. Tacoma isn't even offered in a 6A
Ah, thank you for pointing that out.

I'm always learning something new everyday though these threads.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2012 | 06:50 AM
  #25  
andcas7's Avatar
andcas7
Driver
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: FL
Default

Originally Posted by knguyenk
I personally keep that off, since I noticed that I use more of the power band of the IS in Normal mode (which means I can go faster and make good use of the torque). People that don't see any change in MPG between Normal mode and PWR mode have more than likely reconditioned their throttle input with their foot to the pedal to account for the "increased responsiveness" that they perceive.
Actually, it is not just perception, read the description someone posted earlier, it clearly states it will actually down shift sooner (not faster) if you press the accelerator.

Basically, on normal mode it would take longer for the car to down shift gears and actually get some power going than it does on PWR, when it is ready to down shift almost immediately.

I would assume that trying to get speed from 30mph on 5th gear would not only take longer but also waste more gas than going from 30 to say.. 60 on 3rd or even 4th gear. Does this make any sense? Anyone that has ever driven a manual transmission long enough should understand...

Also, I've been using it for a few months and have not noticed a difference in MPG, I still get the same average per tank of about 27mpg as I did before I even knew this existed.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2012 | 09:45 AM
  #26  
knguyenk's Avatar
knguyenk
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 427
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Default

Originally Posted by andcas7
Actually, it is not just perception, read the description someone posted earlier, it clearly states it will actually down shift sooner (not faster) if you press the accelerator.

Basically, on normal mode it would take longer for the car to down shift gears and actually get some power going than it does on PWR, when it is ready to down shift almost immediately.

I would assume that trying to get speed from 30mph on 5th gear would not only take longer but also waste more gas than going from 30 to say.. 60 on 3rd or even 4th gear. Does this make any sense? Anyone that has ever driven a manual transmission long enough should understand...

Also, I've been using it for a few months and have not noticed a difference in MPG, I still get the same average per tank of about 27mpg as I did before I even knew this existed.
You're correct, the reason why I say that it's a perception is that people that assume that downshifting sooner is their explanation of why it shifts "faster" instead of what you just clarified, "sooner."

I remember a thread not to long ago where Kurtz argued with fellowed members on the PWR button and what it exactly did.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2012 | 10:33 AM
  #27  
diablo1714's Avatar
diablo1714
Driver
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Default

I'm a DD and in 'commuting' traffic 2x daily. The first 6 months I didn't use the PWR setting.
Once I turned it on I did like the accelerator responsiveness when commuting.

If I had a 350 then I probably wouldn't need the PWR setting. But with my 250 AWD, in traffic situations, it felt sluggish without it.

I didn't notice any real change in MPG.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2012 | 11:56 AM
  #28  
Kurtz's Avatar
Kurtz
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,810
Likes: 14
From: NC
Default

Originally Posted by jgr7
I'm not talking about slamming the brakes on, just having to make an unanticipated stop, the multiple downshifts brings the speed down faster than with out the multiple downshifts. I drive in commute traffic and have noticed this often. The same principle as downshifting with a manual as opposed to just pushing in the clutch when making a quick reduction of speed. The transmission is not doing this to help me stop better but in anticipation of acceleration it is putting the transmission in a lower gear for quicker response.

Brake pads are much cheaper than transmissions though... (there's some more reasons not to downshift for braking as well as far as engine wear- but this is discussed in more detail on another thread about why you shouldn't use S mode to brake the car).


My point was whatever 'amount' of braking you experience with a combo of the brake pedal and downshifting, you can get that same amount of braking by just using the brake pedal alone but pushing it down a bit further.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
infinus
IS F (2008-2014)
50
Apr 8, 2019 09:36 AM
rselby
IS F (2008-2014)
3
May 16, 2016 11:22 PM
Goldark
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)
102
Jul 30, 2008 06:49 AM
blux
ES - 1st to 6th Gen (1990-2018)
4
May 12, 2002 12:11 AM
ShowGSLuVv
GS - 2nd Gen (1998-2005)
18
Jan 5, 2002 06:01 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:14 AM.