LS 600 extinct?
In terms of 0-60 performance the 600h is probably equivalent to a 65 or 70 Model S (non-D); however the interior space, luxury features and build/material quality are much higher. I'm still annoyed every time I sit in a Model S at how small the back seat is for such a huge car. The L series cars have cavernous rear seat space; more seemingly than an S or 7 series.
The test drive was helpful because I finally got to compare a 6-seat vs 7-seat configuration. On paper, I really liked the 7-seat configuration, but in person I didn't care for it at all -- way too cramped. The 6-seater is much roomier for all occupants. At a rated 6-second 0-60, the Model X 60D still accelerated to freeway speed quicker than our LS but about the same rate as a 600h. I completely agree that the higher capacity Teslas will smoke the 600h but that's fine, I'm not looking for the fastest car on the block. I like the smooth effortless power of the 600h and the CVT. Where the Model X really falls over is fitment and build quality. It was an area I gave the Model S and Model 3 a pass on but the deficiencies are more glaring on the Model X. The front doors slam pretty loudly and are clunky, reminding me of a friend's Ford Ranger in high school. There were also a lot of creaks, moans, and squeaks when operating the powered second-row seats. The 2016 had 20-inch wheels and, at first, I didn't think the ride was too bad and right in the middle of that thought we hit a dip in the road and I was reminded " oh yea, it does ride really harsh over bumps". After the test drive I re-drove the exact same route in the LS and sure enough the LS made those same dips and bumps feel half the size that they were.
I am still torn between going full Tesla or a blend of qualities with a 600h. The astonishing acceleration of Teslas doesn't impress me as much anymore and I wouldn't be flooring it from stoplight to stoplight anyways. Instantaneous torque and acceleration is a given from Tesla and when I start looking past that for more substance, it really is sorely lacking. As much as I like the Model S/X, I am not confident that I'm getting a better car.
Trending Topics
I am not really sure what to do. I still find myself perusing Tesla inventory. Rumor has it Tesla will reveal redesigned Model S/X this Summer. It will be interesting to see how much further prices will drop. Worst case is I keep driving an LS, which is not a bad thing at all.
Celebrating Lexus & Toyota from Around the Globe
But say I get there and immediately need to go somewhere or do something around town. That happens. I think I would have range anxiety as mentioned above, every time I got in the car. That's a problem for me.
There is an electric vehicle exception. The Volt. It is somewhat like the opposite of a Prius. And in my (former expert) opinion, the Volt is by far the best example of an electric vehicle offered today, and for the last maybe 10 years.
Prius: Gas vehicle with electric assist. Very good concept.
Volt: 100% electrically powered drivetrain, with a gas engine that can serve as a backup generator to power the electric system. A better concept.
If I had a Volt, I could drive it around my home area on electric alone, within it's range, and never tap an ounce of gas. Plug it up overnight, and be good to go another day or 4 (for me, I live very close to work). But if I wanted to drive it across the country, it behaves like a typical gas car. Run it out of its 40 mile range and the gas generator powers the electrical system. And it remains very efficient. But it can run right across the U.S. no problem, just like an LS can. No can do in any Tesla, not without lengthy stops for recharging. Yeah, the drag racing acceleration of a Tesla is good for a giggle. But to me, it's about as useful as the Auto-Park feature on our LS vehicles. Only good for a giggle. I don't prefer to have my lunch slammed against my backbone frequently. I strongly prefer smoothness (and sound).
There's guys on the Volt forum (I saw this years ago, probably different (higher) today) that were tapping on 1,000 mpg and having to put Sta-Bil in their Volt gas tanks because they rarely if ever ran it out of electric range. And were researching (by driving) ways to extend the range. They were doubling the 40 mile range last time I read. A very interesting car, if not a bit small (Corolla sized the one I drove (original Volt)).
Jason Oliver
Every person I know who owns a Tesla (and I know a few Model S and one each of the X and 3 cars) develops an obsession with where they can charge it. 'Oh we'll park here because there's a charger. Let's stop and have a coffee there's a super charger next door. Let's go to the next town over because they have a charger. Oh let's go to your place can I plug the car in for a bit?'
A new term: Charge Location Desirability. It seems to run your life.
Socal is inundated with Model 3 cars so I'm guessing what superchargers that exist are pretty busy now. Unless you have the ability to install the fast charging solution where you park the car either for work or home I'd think it's too much of a PITA. I was considering the Honda hydrogen car but the distance to the Shell station in West LA which was the only place you could fuel it put me off.
Also the big risk for second hand Teslas is the battery. Replacement is I believe a $10,000 - $20,000 operation and while initial reports are encouraging nobody knows how time will affect the battery's range and capacity. I'm sure aftermarket options will pop up but the 600h battery is I believe a $5700 part and sometimes you can cajole Lexus corporate to pick up some of the cost; and again Toyota has a 20 year history with hybrid tech and NiMh battery management. In California at least it's considered part of the emissions control system so it has to be covered for 10 years.
Again you decide what works for you. The LS has a 30 year record of quality and reliability; and no Tesla has a rear seat ottoman seat with shiatsu massage. However the launch and handling is impressive; and the autopilot is actually useful if you have a punishing commute.
The test drive was helpful because I finally got to compare a 6-seat vs 7-seat configuration. On paper, I really liked the 7-seat configuration, but in person I didn't care for it at all -- way too cramped. The 6-seater is much roomier for all occupants. At a rated 6-second 0-60, the Model X 60D still accelerated to freeway speed quicker than our LS but about the same rate as a 600h. I completely agree that the higher capacity Teslas will smoke the 600h but that's fine, I'm not looking for the fastest car on the block. I like the smooth effortless power of the 600h and the CVT. Where the Model X really falls over is fitment and build quality. It was an area I gave the Model S and Model 3 a pass on but the deficiencies are more glaring on the Model X. The front doors slam pretty loudly and are clunky, reminding me of a friend's Ford Ranger in high school. There were also a lot of creaks, moans, and squeaks when operating the powered second-row seats. The 2016 had 20-inch wheels and, at first, I didn't think the ride was too bad and right in the middle of that thought we hit a dip in the road and I was reminded " oh yea, it does ride really harsh over bumps". After the test drive I re-drove the exact same route in the LS and sure enough the LS made those same dips and bumps feel half the size that they were.
I am still torn between going full Tesla or a blend of qualities with a 600h. The astonishing acceleration of Teslas doesn't impress me as much anymore and I wouldn't be flooring it from stoplight to stoplight anyways. Instantaneous torque and acceleration is a given from Tesla and when I start looking past that for more substance, it really is sorely lacking. As much as I like the Model S/X, I am not confident that I'm getting a better car.
The one thing really holding me back from getting anxious to pull the trigger on Tesla is the anticipation of the Audi ETron GT, which I think is the most stunning car (not just EV) I have seen in a very long time. While it will require you at least doubling your budget, perhaps holding off 18-24 months will be worth it so you can save up some extra money? I think Porsche is also releasing an EV sedan around the same time as the ETron GT release. The only thing I don't like about the ETron GT is the anticipated range of only 248 miles - and just yesterday Tesla announced an upgrade to the Model S which gets you to 370 miles. That is a substantial difference when you consider taking a road trip.
While I agree with Steve's comments about the Tesla acceleration losing its "wow factor", I think the ultimate question is how you plan on using the car. For me, I would be ditching my LS460, inheriting the LX from my wife, and she'd drive the Tesla. She drives about 40-50 miles/day in routine city driving. I imagine we'd take it on road trips of 2-3 hours one way several times per year. For me, the appeal in Tesla is not the acceleration - it's the concept of moving away from a car that requires fuel and the maintenance associated with traditional ICE engine designs. And I absolutely love the technology, ability to have the car updated over WiFi, the screen to control everything, etc. I'd be willing to sacrifice on the luxury feeling of the LS in exchange for some of what a Tesla or other high-end EV will offer.
.... edited for brevity
Jason Oliver










