2022 Toyota Tundra (780B)
I'm really not blown away at all by the hybrid's performance numbers. 0-60 in 5.7 seconds is good but with 538lb/ft of torque it should be significantly faster. The 1/4 trap speed is low, also. 14.5 seconds is decent but 92MPH trap speed? Any high end GM or Ford will handily beat this with just an engine, no hybrid. Silverado with the 6.2 has a 99.5 MPH trap speed. That's definitely a "left in the dust" difference down the 1/4.
https://www.motortrend.com/reviews/2...2l-first-test/
https://www.motortrend.com/reviews/2...2l-first-test/
Last edited by AJT123; Feb 1, 2022 at 05:19 PM.
what is the V6tt?
I've never driven an Ecoboost but I can promise you a GM with the 6.2 is quite a satisfying engine....faster than this hybrid and it's a V8. GM truck drivability has always been good.
The article I posted of that Chevy gushed about the engine.
I have yet to see posted times of the non hybrid, and trust me I've been looking.
The article I posted of that Chevy gushed about the engine.
I have yet to see posted times of the non hybrid, and trust me I've been looking.
I've never driven an Ecoboost but I can promise you a GM with the 6.2 is quite a satisfying engine....faster than this hybrid and it's a V8. GM truck drivability has always been good.
The article I posted of that Chevy gushed about the engine.
I have yet to see posted times of the non hybrid, and trust me I've been looking.
The article I posted of that Chevy gushed about the engine.
I have yet to see posted times of the non hybrid, and trust me I've been looking.
https://www.motortrend.com/reviews/2...-term-arrival/
Not as good. That doesn't mean it has inferior drivability, at all.
I think you underestimate how many Americans don't care about a few MPG. These are expensive vehicles, people can afford the gas bills. The government may act like they sweat all night over MPG but I assure you most Americans don't. I see so many Toyota trucks and SUVs powered by the gas guzzler 5.7 I have it makes me dizzy, we all share awful mpg and I doubt it keeps many of us up at night.
LOTS and LOTS of consumers out there that would take a pushrod 2 valve Corvette 6.2 V8 over hybrid 3.4tt without even thinking about anything, including mileage. If you truly care about MPG then yes this Tundra may be for you. I like the Tundra too, but the engine not over a proven, potent V8.
I think you underestimate how many Americans don't care about a few MPG. These are expensive vehicles, people can afford the gas bills. The government may act like they sweat all night over MPG but I assure you most Americans don't. I see so many Toyota trucks and SUVs powered by the gas guzzler 5.7 I have it makes me dizzy, we all share awful mpg and I doubt it keeps many of us up at night.
LOTS and LOTS of consumers out there that would take a pushrod 2 valve Corvette 6.2 V8 over hybrid 3.4tt without even thinking about anything, including mileage. If you truly care about MPG then yes this Tundra may be for you. I like the Tundra too, but the engine not over a proven, potent V8.
A big NA V8 doesnt have the low end torque of a TTV6, let alone one boosted by a hybrid in this way. You need to drive it, you'll see. Turbo engines excel in drivability over NA engines.
Then they can buy the Chevy.
Not every offering has to be the same. I don't care about MPG personally, but that's the selling proposition of the decision to move to this type of engine for Toyota. As gas gets more and more expensive, people will start to care more than you think...same thing happened in 2008. The cheapest regular fuel I can find around here now is $3.70 a gallon. Paying for a $75,000 truck AND fueling it is a very expensive proposition.
Even Chevy buyers care...thats why the 6.2L has a 10 speed.
LOTS and LOTS of consumers out there that would take a pushrod 2 valve Corvette 6.2 V8 over hybrid 3.4tt without even thinking about anything, including mileage. If you truly care about MPG then yes this Tundra may be for you. I like the Tundra too, but the engine not over a proven, potent V8.
Not every offering has to be the same. I don't care about MPG personally, but that's the selling proposition of the decision to move to this type of engine for Toyota. As gas gets more and more expensive, people will start to care more than you think...same thing happened in 2008. The cheapest regular fuel I can find around here now is $3.70 a gallon. Paying for a $75,000 truck AND fueling it is a very expensive proposition.
Even Chevy buyers care...thats why the 6.2L has a 10 speed.
"Interestingly, the 3.5-liter twin-turbo V-6 in the Ford F-150 makes 500 lb-ft of torque (and 400 hp), but because of both a touch of turbo lag and the fact that Chevy is better at programming the 10-speed, the Blue Oval truck doesn't feel as quick nor as powerful."
Big displacement, big torque. It may peak later but 80- 90% of torque in big V8s is available down low.
Many, MANY GM truck owners lovvvve their pushrod V8s. Myself included with my dinosaur.
Not every offering has to be the same. I don't care about MPG personally, but that's the selling proposition of the decision to move to this type of engine for Toyota. As gas gets more and more expensive, people will start to care more than you think...same thing happened in 2008.
$3.70 is horrendous...but are you inferring people really can't handle the fuel bills? Really? I just bought an expensive boat in the neighborhood price of high end 1500s that will cost $150 to fill up each time until gas goes back down, sucks but it is what it is. I paid $5000 for the engine upgrade, 50 extra horsepower. It's going to cost me more, do I care? No.
GM fuel economy people care, the buyers don't. What is pushed on us and what we actually listen to and/or care about are different things.
Last edited by AJT123; Feb 1, 2022 at 08:27 PM.
Oh yes it does. Did you even read the article? Turbos excel in drivability? That is a matter of opinion. Turbos are here first and foremost for CAFE and fuel economy. Otherwise we'd have larger displacement and supercharged V8s in my opinion. One can dream.
"Interestingly, the 3.5-liter twin-turbo V-6 in the Ford F-150 makes 500 lb-ft of torque (and 400 hp), but because of both a touch of turbo lag and the fact that Chevy is better at programming the 10-speed, the Blue Oval truck doesn't feel as quick nor as powerful."
Big displacement, big torque. It may peak later but 80- 90% of torque in big V8s is available down low.
"Interestingly, the 3.5-liter twin-turbo V-6 in the Ford F-150 makes 500 lb-ft of torque (and 400 hp), but because of both a touch of turbo lag and the fact that Chevy is better at programming the 10-speed, the Blue Oval truck doesn't feel as quick nor as powerful."
Big displacement, big torque. It may peak later but 80- 90% of torque in big V8s is available down low.
Have you ever driven one of these trucks with the turbocharged engines? Yes, it does. The torque curves are much lower in a TT engine than a NA engine. Live with a TT engine for a while, like I said the drivability benefit is there. Its physics.
Many, MANY GM truck owners lovvvve their pushrod V8s. Myself included with my dinosaur.
GM 6.2 gets 21MPG highway and 19 combined, that's not the greatest out there, but good enough. SO.MANY.PEOPLE. could not care less about MPG.
If you operate trucks for business, that savings is astronomical. Its a business game changer.
Gas will go back down in a year or two once we get pro-fossil fuel people back in power, this isn't permanent.
$3.70 is horrendous...but are you inferring people really can't handle the fuel bills? Really? I just bought an expensive boat in the neighborhood price of high end 1500s that will cost $150 to fill up each time until gas goes back down, sucks but it is what it is. I paid $5000 for the engine upgrade, 50 extra horsepower. It's going to cost me more, do I care? No.
You dont care about the price of fuel, and thats fine...but most people do....you see it in every survey and poll taken and Presidential approval ratings wouldn't be so closely tied to fuel prices as they are if people didn't care. Look at polls of the top things people look at when shopping for a car, fuel economy is always one of the top things.
What is pushed on us and what we actually listen to and/or care about are different things.
You love V8s, but like it or not the future does not include V8s. Trucks will be last, but their time is coming...you already see it. When do you think you would have seen a 2.7L 4 cyl in a 1/2 ton Chevy pickup? Well, its there.
Last edited by SW17LS; Feb 2, 2022 at 07:22 AM.
Ford F-150 3.5L Powerboost Full Hybrid V6 Engine
430 horsepower, 570 lb-ft of torque.
Toyota Tundra i-Force MAX 3.5L Twin Turbo V6 Hybrid
437 horsepower, 583 lb-ft of torque.












