Toyota Kills All V8 Engine Development
It is really sad Toyota is giving up on V8's, it gives the perception of quitting and not wanting to really compete anymore. Lexus was having trouble competing with the Germans for the past few years and offering less V8's certainly added to that in sales and perception. We have seen how poorly it has worked out giving the LS a ttV6 over a V8, sales and perception are poor, the much older S class still handily outsells it. The GS lost its semi affordable V8 option and look what happened to sales, nobody bought the hybrid GS. With Lexus losing V8's, going more CUV, putting 4 cylinders in just about everything, more and more FWD I just don't see the brand as very special anymore or exciting, I have no real desire to own a future Lexus aside from a LC500 and maybe a used LS460 but that is about it and I will likely look to other brands in the future. Sad but it is not just Toyota, it is all Japanese lux brands basically giving up, going more CUV/4 cyl/boring. Never thought I would see the day when Hyundai/Genesis flagship sedan is more appealing to me then Lexus's. Lexus has fallen far from grace and continues that way.
I'd rather an EV that does low 11s and has no maintenance cost vs. expensive to maintain ICE. I don't take my enthusiast performance cars on long road trips because thats what my family minivan is for. I can beat on my EV all day long and there is practically no stress on the drivetrain...guilt free speed with instant throttle response and torque. There are plenty of enthusiasts that want EVs...go to the driving performance section of the Tesla forums and you'll find mostly former M3 / AMG / 911 / Mustang owners. There are more enthusiasts joining those forums everyday. Most likely Toyota understand this and made the right decision in killing the V8 and focusing on the future.
Aside from Tesla nobody is buying or really wants electrics, aside from Prius nobody is really buying hybrids in any large numbers, hybrid luxury car sales are next to nothing, same thing with non Tesla electrics. It is the brand/image why those vehicles are selling, not because they are so superior to ICE cars and most other car companies simply can't come up with the image to sell hybrids or electrics.
Last edited by UDel; Aug 14, 2020 at 10:26 AM.
There are many IC cars that do/can do 11's, you are not doing that over and over in a EV too, you get just a few of those runs until your power and performance goes down, you need to take a brake/re charge. ICE cars are not expensive to maintain unless you are talking about a unreliable Italian/German which is more in design then ICE. You can take carefree long trips in ICE performance cars, that is the nice thing about them and their range is not greatly degraded by cold weather either. There is no real stress in a ICE driveline if you beat on those cars, you better hope the battery does not go out not covered under warranty or it is denied because you abused it, that is a huge bill for EV's. I see no real trend in 911/M3/Mustang GT drivers getting rid of those cars for ugly Teslas that are next to useless on the track/endurance racing, maybe they are adding a Tesla to the stable/wife wants one but they aren't dumping their ICE performance cars and replacing them with a Tesla in any large numbers.
Aside from Tesla nobody is buying or really wants electrics, aside from Prius nobody is really buying hybrids in any large numbers, hybrid luxury car sales are next to nothing, same thing with non Tesla electrics. It is the brand/image why those vehicles are selling, not because they are so superior to ICE cars.
Aside from Tesla nobody is buying or really wants electrics, aside from Prius nobody is really buying hybrids in any large numbers, hybrid luxury car sales are next to nothing, same thing with non Tesla electrics. It is the brand/image why those vehicles are selling, not because they are so superior to ICE cars.
That is still one of the highest age avg's, only Caddy and Buick are higher and I am willing to be the avg starts more in the 40's and a chunk of those in the 40's are more IS and RC buyers, I just don't see many in their 30's or 40's getting ES's and RX's. I am definitely a outlier, I got my first Lexus in my mid 20's and it was a GS430.
Caddy has more performance-oriented and RWD cars in their lineup than Lexus, yet the average age of their buyers is among the highest. That alone says something.
The amount of IS and RC buyers is completely insignificant compared to the amount of ES and RX buyers and the smaller CUVs. They would have little to no impact in swaying the average.
Caddy has more performance-oriented and RWD cars in their lineup than Lexus, yet the average age of their buyers is among the highest. That alone says something.
Caddy has more performance-oriented and RWD cars in their lineup than Lexus, yet the average age of their buyers is among the highest. That alone says something.
http://www.city-data.com/blog/6719-c...ngest-drivers/
A Model 3 Performance doesn't have heat build-up...you can do runs till you run out of juice and you'll go from low 11s to high 11s. On a track, you'll do 30 min before you need to recharge but not many take their sports sedans to the track. The battery is covered for 120k miles or 8 years...and you can't abuse a battery or electric motor. Most of the Tesla batteries go 300k so not really worried about the battery at all and in everyday driving, its the most responsive drivetrain in the world. I can't think of a new performance car at the $55k level that can outrun a Tesla. Not to mention no drivetrain maintenance and minimal fuel up costs. You can't tell me a Camaro or Mustang or Vette with a V8 is cheap to maintain. You abuse those things and they break if not well maintained. EVs are in their infancy and they've redefined speed at an affordable price. Others EVs will come to drive up the innovation and I'm hoping Toyota will be one of them.
With the more somewhat affordable price of the Tesla 3 you get a very goofy ugly car with one of if not the worst interiors and poorest build quality in modern automobiles.
You abuse any car and you are going to have issues, Tesla 3's are among the least reliable cars according to Consumer Reports so I don't know why you keep touting them as being so well made and indestructible. As long as you have the proper fluids at the proper levels in the cars you listed there is no real issues driving them hard or them being expensive to maintain, oil, coolant, and trans fluid is not expensive at all. I know many people with Corvettes,Camaro's, Mustangs and they are not expensive to maintain at all, my Lexus vehicles have not been expensive to maintain at all, less then $100 a year on avg mainly being oil, I can do most of my own maintenance. Most EV's are not affordable at all, at least the ones with good performance and there are still older ICE cars that are quicker and less compromised, most are much better track/endurance race cars.
With the more somewhat affordable price of the Tesla 3 you get a very goofy ugly car with one of if not the worst interiors and poorest build quality in modern automobiles.
With the more somewhat affordable price of the Tesla 3 you get a very goofy ugly car with one of if not the worst interiors and poorest build quality in modern automobiles.
https://www.autoblog.com/2019/11/14/...bility-survey/
i don't know where you get the least reliable thing at all. They seem to have average reliability in CR. If you follow the recommended maintenance on any ICE, it will be more expensive than an EV. That is simply irrefutable. EVs in certain segments are cheaper than their ICE counterparts. Compare a Model 3 to a 3 series or a Model Y to the X3. The EV counterparts are far cheaper at a given performance point. At the same price point, the EV spanks the ICE in their segments. I agree the ICEs are better track and endurance cars because most tracks don't have level 3 superchargers for a quick 15 min fill
Yeah...so strange because the RAV4 Prime is actually an excellent car. Near the top of its class and something I'd even consider for wifey (although she's interested now in the Model Y too). If you stuck that powertrain in the Lexus IS/GS, i bet it would get tons of sales. It would basically replace the old V6 and provide similar horsepower with insane mpg.
areas that you don’t everyday is very cheaply made.
That is still one of the highest age avg's, only Caddy and Buick are higher and I am willing to be the avg starts more in the 40's and a chunk of those in the 40's are more IS and RC buyers, I just don't see many in their 30's or 40's getting ES's and RX's. I am definitely a outlier, I got my first Lexus in my mid 20's and it was a GS430.
most people in their 20s cannot afford new GS or Rx.
Originally Posted by 703
rav4 while popular is full of hard plastic trim. It’s a huge downgrade from any Lexus. Have you been in one in person ?
areas that you don’t everyday is very cheaply made.
areas that you don’t everyday is very cheaply made.
According to CarMax in 2018, the average age of the Lexus buyer is 45. You can bet ES and RX which are the bread and butter of the brand contribute to that average.
https://www.carmax.com/articles/whic...oungest-buyers
https://www.carmax.com/articles/whic...oungest-buyers
Japan is deliberately decoupling from China to stop the dependency on China for rare earth metals.
PS. Also notice some former 3IS buyers get an RX350 once they have their first child.
Last edited by EXE46; Aug 14, 2020 at 03:14 PM.













