BUICK 3800: The best engine EVER!
The 3800 went through three generation, and up to mid 90ies 3800 Series 1 made 170hp/210lb/tq, and with series 2 introduced in 95 power was 205hp/230tq, and Series 3 in 2004 with the same output. Even with the supercharger they made only 240hp/280tq with series 2. This is more or less in line with the "gutless" japanese V6 engine of that era, perhaps with some torque advantage due to much higher displacement. For instance 86-92 Camry had a 2.5 V6 making 160hp/160tq, Maxima's 3.0 made 190-220hp/200tq.
Starting in the mid 90ies most Japanese V6 engines had more HP than the 3800, despite still being smaller displacement, and by 2000's smaller NA Japanese V6 engines were making more power and torque than even the supercharged 3800. It was certainly time to retire the 3800 which just couldn't compete in the late 2000s anymore.
240/280 are solid numbers, even still today, and that number was very underrated. S/C 3800s were monsters. V8 power almost.
But yes, I suppose its time was up.
Numbers on paper were solid, but on pavement it failed to deliver. I owned the original LS400 with the 1UZ, and a GS430 with the 3UZ - which was basically an improved 1UZ. The 1UZ was Toyotas first V8 engine, and it did have a number of issues. By the time they ironed them out and made various tweaks during that decade, and it transitioned into the 3UZ it was barely recognizable.
No they didn't. I can't think of one Japanese V6 "bread and butter" sedan that had 205hp. Not Maxima, Camry, 626 V6, not even the Legend unless it was the GS with 230hp. None of them had the displacement or torque, either.
240/280 are solid numbers, even still today, and that number was very underrated. S/C 3800s were monsters. V8 power almost.
The original 1UZ suffered from a number of issues. Blocked EGR valves, cracked EGR pipers, ECUs using faulty capacitors and going bad, terrible IAC valves that went bad, terrible MAF sensors that went bad, clogged throttle bodies, a bunch of poorly designed coolant lines that went through every fcking component - they had a coolant line going through the throttle body valve, IAC valve, EGR valve for no good reason, and working on that engine was just a complete nightmare. These were all $1000+ repairs, and Toyota rectified them all on the latest 1UZ. It was also one of the last engines to use OBD1 so you couldn't diagnose it, and it also used old school distributor based ignition that was prone to all kind of fails. The engine also needed periodic valve adjustment because it did not have hydraulic lifters. The engine also had this gigantic mechanical fan that was in the way of everything and a huge pain to remove, with a ridiculously expensive fan pulley that was prone to failure. It also had leaking power steering pump and leaking high pressure power steering hoses that were also ridiculously expensive. Working on anything in front or top of the engine required removal of a bunch of vacuum line, coolant line and a bunch of other components. In comparison the 3UZ was such an elegant, well thought out design, and a delight to work on.
The original 1UZ suffered from a number of issues. Blocked EGR valves, cracked EGR pipers, ECUs using faulty capacitors and going bad, terrible IAC valves that went bad, terrible MAF sensors that went bad, clogged throttle bodies, a bunch of poorly designed coolant lines that went through every fcking component - they had a coolant line going through the throttle body valve, IAC valve, EGR valve for no good reason, and working on that engine was just a complete nightmare. These were all $1000+ repairs, and Toyota rectified them all on the latest 1UZ. It was also one of the last engines to use OBD1 so you couldn't diagnose it, and it also used old school distributor based ignition that was prone to all kind of fails. The engine also needed periodic valve adjustment because it did not have hydraulic lifters. The engine also had this gigantic mechanical fan that was in the way of everything and a huge pain to remove, with a ridiculously expensive fan pulley that was prone to failure. It also had leaking power steering pump and leaking high pressure power steering hoses that were also ridiculously expensive. Working on anything in front or top of the engine required removal of a bunch of vacuum line, coolant line and a bunch of other components. In comparison the 3UZ was such an elegant, well thought out design, and a delight to work on.
FWIW I still see beater 400s on the road with that 1-UZ.
Also, in general where the Japanese and Germans were losing on displacement and torque they made up through more efficient drivetrains and balanced output. It was ages ago of course, but somehow the V6 Maximas and Accords just felt a lot quicker and sportier than Buicks equipped with the 3800.
Well, the 2JZ matched it for torque and had more HP with less displacement. The Acura Legend engine wasn't too far off, and J30 I think made similar power.
Also, in general where the Japanese and Germans were losing on displacement and torque they made up through more efficient drivetrains and balanced output. It was ages ago of course, but somehow the V6 Maximas and Accords just felt a lot quicker and sportier than Buicks equipped with the 3800.
Also, in general where the Japanese and Germans were losing on displacement and torque they made up through more efficient drivetrains and balanced output. It was ages ago of course, but somehow the V6 Maximas and Accords just felt a lot quicker and sportier than Buicks equipped with the 3800.
The S/C Park Avenue in the (early?) 90s, I remember a M/T article listing all these foreign luxury cars (including every Lexus except the SC400) that would lose a 0-60 MPH sprint to the Buick.
The first Accord V6 made 170hp IIRC....gutless. J30 was alright but a gas guzzler and felt slower than a 3800 bc it had significantly less torque. Now once the Maxima got the 3.0 VQ, there was a great engine.
The S/C Park Avenue in the (early?) 90s, I remember a M/T article listing all these foreign luxury cars (including every Lexus except the SC400) that would lose a 0-60 MPH sprint to the Buick.
The S/C Park Avenue in the (early?) 90s, I remember a M/T article listing all these foreign luxury cars (including every Lexus except the SC400) that would lose a 0-60 MPH sprint to the Buick.
Well, the first 3800 also made 170hp. Either way, my point is that most any Japanese V6 from that era was at least as reliable as the 3800, and even if the Japanese engines gave up some displacement and torque, they were put into much superior cars. I'd take a mid 90ies Avalon over any Buick of that era 10 times out of 10.
"Bread and butter" GM cars had good pickup in the 1980s while most (not all) foreign cars could barely get out of their own way then.
Yes, I'd drive an Avalon, too, over an old Buick but not because of the engine.
At the same time 86-92 Camry V6 engine per wikipedia - "The 2VZ-FE is a 2.5 L (2,507 cc) version. Bore and stroke is 87.5 mm × 69.5 mm (3.44 in × 2.74 in) and the compression ratio is 9.0:1. Output is 159 bhp (119 kW; 161 PS) at 5800 rpm and 159 lb⋅ft (216 N⋅m) at 4600 rpm with redline limit of 6800 rpm."
So basically the same HP with a lot less displacement. Less torque but a lot more efficient drivetrain and just a vastly superior car to the junk that GM was building at that time.
Also, just about any V6 engine from the Japanese was guaranteed to be reliable, while GM only had the 3800 that was decent - the rest of their V6 engines were complete disasters. Heck, the 3800 was the only decent V6 engine from the big three, as whatever Ford and Chrysler built at that time was just junk.
Well, out of Wikipedia "Introduced in 1988, the 3800 LN3 would later be loosely considered the Pre-Series I, although the older 3.8 SFI (LG3) was still available that year in some models. Designated initially by VIN code C, the multiport fuel injected 3800 LN3 was a major redesign, featuring changes such as a balance shaft, on-center bore spacing, use of a 3x/18x crank-trigger system, and other improvements. This generation continued in use in several GM products into the early 1990s. It produced 165 hp (123 kW) and 210 lb⋅ft (285 N⋅m)."
At the same time 86-92 Camry V6 engine per wikipedia - "The 2VZ-FE is a 2.5 L (2,507 cc) version. Bore and stroke is 87.5 mm × 69.5 mm (3.44 in × 2.74 in) and the compression ratio is 9.0:1. Output is 159 bhp (119 kW; 161 PS) at 5800 rpm and 159 lb⋅ft (216 N⋅m) at 4600 rpm with redline limit of 6800 rpm."
So basically the same HP with a lot less displacement. Less torque but a lot more efficient drivetrain and just a vastly superior car to the junk that GM was building at that time.
At the same time 86-92 Camry V6 engine per wikipedia - "The 2VZ-FE is a 2.5 L (2,507 cc) version. Bore and stroke is 87.5 mm × 69.5 mm (3.44 in × 2.74 in) and the compression ratio is 9.0:1. Output is 159 bhp (119 kW; 161 PS) at 5800 rpm and 159 lb⋅ft (216 N⋅m) at 4600 rpm with redline limit of 6800 rpm."
So basically the same HP with a lot less displacement. Less torque but a lot more efficient drivetrain and just a vastly superior car to the junk that GM was building at that time.
Per wikipedia, the Avalon had a 3.0 1MZ-FE V6 engine making 192 hp (140 kW) and 210 lb⋅ft (285 N⋅m) of torque. So that's very much on par with the 3800, and was later upgraded with VVTi to develop 210 hp (157 kW; 213 PS) at 5800 rpm with 222 lb⋅ft (301 N⋅m) of torque at 4400 rpm.
Also, just about any V6 engine from the Japanese was guaranteed to be reliable, while GM only had the 3800 that was decent - the rest of their V6 engines were complete disasters. Heck, the 3800 was the only decent V6 engine from the big three, as whatever Ford and Chrysler built at that time was just junk.
And IDK if you know this but that Camry V6 engine (2.5) that you mentioned had a bad sludge problem.













