When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Transverse is larger than the Tahoe. Enclave is smaller than the Transverse
Traverse and Enclave both come from the same FWD/AWD platform, Jill. (Acadia once did, but is a smaller platform now). The Tahoe is traditional BOF, RWD/AWD, full-size pickup-based.
I like the size of it and wouldn't really want to see it up-sized. We've been happy with the size of the outgoing model, and find it being on the smaller size of the segment to be an attribute, and not a negative. I don't want to drive, park, and maneuver a large vehicle around in the city or have to shoe-horn it into my garage. I do think the compact size takes it out of the running for larger families, but if my family was even one child larger (I have two), I probably would be in a minivan. What we have is a vehicle that is supremely comfortable for my family of 4, and when we need to carry additional people, we have the third row for that. I have spent time in our third row, and despite having long legs (36" inseam), I can easily sit back there. It's not especially comfortable and I wouldn't want to take a long trip in it, but it's totally acceptable for a trip out to dinner or around town. This new one is supposed to be better back there, so I am sure it'll sell like crazy.
From the review, I didn't get any impression of "Lexus." No wood, little luxury, etc. Not a bad job, but not up-class.
So it's quite interesting Toyota decided to use the Highlander to re-introduce a Boss Hogg feature...
I assume it's like the outgoing model where the (fake) wood trim is used on the Limited/Platinum models. This video shows an XLE, which is probably going to be the volume trim, like the previous version.
I agree that Highlander likely should have moved a bit bigger, but Highlander has been smallest in the main 3 row segment (outside of like the Sorento and Outlander, etc) for quite some time and still leads in sales. That said, the segment has shifted bigger. Toyota obviously has the Sienna for larger 3 row intenders, with their segment exclusive AWD. So within their portfolio they obviously didn't feel pressured to go Atlas/Ascent size, let alone behemoth Traverse/Enclave.
Like you said, it'll still sell, and they'll likely never know how much more it might have sold had it been that half size larger. As you know, Toyota drags its heels on a lot of things, look at how long it took for a 3 row Lexus to show up, and even then, pretty terrible (since it's Highlander based). This may not bode well for an improved (read: significantly enlarged) RX-L, so maybe they'll have an more dedicated larger 3 row for Lexus, since they don't have Sienna to offer for larger 3 row needs.
Maybe they are leaving it for next Sequoia, and I also think Highlander might become truly global vehicle in the future too hence the focus on manageable size.
sienna's a minivan, with an ANCIENT interior, which is a niche vehicle
I'm guessing that the new Sienna won't be too far behind, and thus serving as the larger 3 row offering, still with available AWD. None of the other OEMs have that to offer within the brand.
I like the size of it and wouldn't really want to see it up-sized. We've been happy with the size of the outgoing model, and find it being on the smaller size of the segment to be an attribute, and not a negative. I don't want to drive, park, and maneuver a large vehicle around in the city or have to shoe-horn it into my garage. I do think the compact size takes it out of the running for larger families, but if my family was even one child larger (I have two), I probably would be in a minivan. What we have is a vehicle that is supremely comfortable for my family of 4, and when we need to carry additional people, we have the third row for that. I have spent time in our third row, and despite having long legs (36" inseam), I can easily sit back there. It's not especially comfortable and I wouldn't want to take a long trip in it, but it's totally acceptable for a trip out to dinner or around town. This new one is supposed to be better back there, so I am sure it'll sell like crazy.
This is exactly why Toyota didn't want to mess with the Highlander's size. Current owners love it for its size. I imagine most owners, like JDR here, see the 3rd row as occasional use. Where some of the competitor 3 rows might be more suited for more regular usage.
This could be on our short list to replace our 07 rx. Wife wants a third row to bus around friends of our two kiddos. A small third row fits that bill. We drove the merc GLS and it's just way too big for me.
Toyota and Lexus Join Mille Miglia For The First Time
Slideshow: A five-car lineup spanning more than five decades of Toyota performance and engineering will tackle one of Italy's most celebrated automotive routes.