When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
GX is in a league of its own, and whether thats a good thing or bad thing time will tell. The aviator is targeting all the 3 row crossovers from luxury Marques
Value is what Lincoln is going to cover most with their pricing structure as it covers everything from an XC90, MDX, RX-L (i threw that one in for kicks caz really its just holding an L), all new Caddy, QX60 all the way to GLS/q7?X7 territory.
The issue on the higher end is, well if you are paying that much, bump into Navigator, Future Escalade, LX, X7 with options or GLS with options.
Sure there will be some overlap, but the majority won't be fully loaded Aviators.
The Aviator is RWD based. It's most direct competitors the GLE and X5 are also built on RWD platforms. The XC90, MDX, RXL, XT6, QX60 I consider a side step down due to their FWD derived underpinnings.
Sure there will be some overlap, but the majority won't be fully loaded Aviators.
The Aviator is RWD based. It's most direct competitors the GLE and X5 are also built on RWD platforms. The XC90, MDX, RXL, XT6, QX60 I consider a side step down due to their FWD derived underpinnings.
Quite true, RWD vs FWD, but I think prospective owners will also care about how it is to live with the 3 row. The aviator interior is uber special, mini navigator. The XC90 is quite comparable even though its a FWD.
Off the bat, the MDX and QX60 win the cheapo award with interior quality (the MDX advance has some good open pore wood, but soo much plastic)
XT6 TBD
I believe Lincoln has positioned the 3 row MKT to compete with MDX, QX60, etc. I believe they want the Aviator to compete with Range Rover Sport and that level of vehicles. When I saw the profile of the Aviator on the Lincoln website, the RR Sport is the first vehicle that came to mind, and pricing is in the same ball park when you start loading out the Aviator.
Quite true, RWD vs FWD, but I think prospective owners will also care about how it is to live with the 3 row. The aviator interior is uber special, mini navigator. The XC90 is quite comparable even though its a FWD.
Off the bat, the MDX and QX60 win the cheapo award with interior quality (the MDX advance has some good open pore wood, but soo much plastic)
XT6 TBD
Yes it's true the majority of people don't know or ask RWD vs FWD, which is why the RX often gets compared to the X5 a lot. Based on the 'midsize' principle.
Originally Posted by wasjr
I believe Lincoln has positioned the 3 row MKT to compete with MDX, QX60, etc. I believe they want the Aviator to compete with Range Rover Sport and that level of vehicles. When I saw the profile of the Aviator on the Lincoln website, the RR Sport is the first vehicle that came to mind, and pricing is in the same ball park when you start loading out the Aviator.
But that's sort of stating the obvious. They didn't go the MKT route with the Aviator. They elevated it's status and what's available. The MKT was never available even with the upgraded EcoBoost with 400hp nor a more powerful PHEV version. The Nautilus while not three rows, will inherit some of what the MKT went after.
I believe Lincoln has positioned the 3 row MKT to compete with MDX, QX60, etc. I believe they want the Aviator to compete with Range Rover Sport and that level of vehicles. When I saw the profile of the Aviator on the Lincoln website, the RR Sport is the first vehicle that came to mind, and pricing is in the same ball park when you start loading out the Aviator.
Yes. This completely makes sense. GX is a competitor.
Yes. This completely makes sense. GX is a competitor.
Love the GX, but I know that a 9 year old design doesn't really stand against these fresh faces The only other lumbering giant was the LR, and that too is better after the recent refresh.
GX is a terrible comparison, because it has no direct competition. It’s really an odd duck in a lonely segment. Aviator is the antidote to X5 and GLE though the latter two will still win in sales.
GX is a different sort of vehicle, but this does compete with the GX as most buyers of the GX aren't looking for the sort of capability that makes the GX special.
GX is a different sort of vehicle, but this does compete with the GX as most buyers of the GX aren't looking for the sort of capability that makes the GX special.
I would buy an Aviator over a GX also for sure.
Indirectly sure because it’s a midsize with three rows. But the GX is niche because of its BOF, 4x4, “barn door” etc. GLE and X5 are direct competitors of the Aviator.
Indirectly sure because it’s a midsize with three rows. But the GX is niche because of its BOF, 4x4, “barn door” etc. GLE and X5 are direct competitors of the Aviator.
And of the handful of people I know with a GX, zero of them purchased due to those features that are unique in the class. We cross-shopped the GX, X5, and ultimately bought the Q7. Had the Aviator been available, it also would have been in the running.
Yes, the GX has some fundamental differences compared to other members of its class, but that doesn't mean it's in a different class.
From looks alone, this is a very sharp looking truck - both interior and exterior!
Lincoln has never been know for quality, though I would probably rely on them more than Range Rover for sure. It's an older company image brand to me, always has been until more recently when Lincoln hired McConaughey as their spokesperson to try and bring the brand's average age DOWN. Image is everything for many companies and this is something Corvette has been trying to change for as many years as I can remember.
We were in the market for a large 7-8 passenger SUV that can haul 9000+ and I did look at the Navigator at one point but just didn't do it for me. The Aviator is way too small for our intentions but if we were looking for a smaller 5-passenger SUV, it would most likely be a Mercedes or Lexus. I'm a huge BMW fan but let's face it BMW does not make great SUV's. Range Rover would not even be in the same breath.
P.S. we bought a Escalade ESV Platinum and could not be happier (who says Cadillac is not successful?). They know their market and both their coupes and SUV's are some of the best. If I wasn't such a diehard BMW M-car guy I would get a CTS-V wagon for sure!
And of the handful of people I know with a GX, zero of them purchased due to those features that are unique in the class. We cross-shopped the GX, X5, and ultimately bought the Q7. Had the Aviator been available, it also would have been in the running.
Yes, the GX has some fundamental differences compared to other members of its class, but that doesn't mean it's in a different class.
I said competes indirectly, I never denied it’s not a midsize or a different class. I did say it’s a niche within its segment. Again the most natural competitors of the Aviator are the X5 and GLE.
And of the handful of people I know with a GX, zero of them purchased due to those features that are unique in the class. We cross-shopped the GX, X5, and ultimately bought the Q7. Had the Aviator been available, it also would have been in the running.
Yes, the GX has some fundamental differences compared to other members of its class, but that doesn't mean it's in a different class.
Again the most natural competitors of the Aviator are the X5 and GLE.
FCA could probably have a credible RWD/4WD competitor if they upgraded their Dodge Durango and gave it a Chrysler (not Dodge)-grade interior. But, so far, there's no sign of that...or of a full-size SUV off of the Ram 1500.
Last edited by mmarshall; Feb 27, 2019 at 07:09 PM.
I'm sorry......a typo, my bad. I meant the Durango (corrected)....I've mixed those two up before. It's not plush enough inside, in Dodge trim, to compete with the Aviator, but that's where he designers come in.
FCA has the Jeep Grand Cherokee
Nice, but again, not quite in the Aviator's class. But you may have a point.....it may be a little closer than the standard Durango.