Notices
Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova

Worst depreciation per NADA guide line (import)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 6, 2008 | 09:42 PM
  #1  
v8lvr's Avatar
v8lvr
Thread Starter
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default Worst depreciation per NADA guide line (import)

For one year old car. Jaguar is the worst with 25% value lost after one year.
Notice that they evaluate import only, probably because most Ford/GM/Chrysler lose 50% the moment driven off dealer lot, so no point tracking them.

3 out of 10 are Audi, pretty predictable huh.

============

(Check out the top 10 list and the press release after the jump)

Make Model Annual Depreciation
Jaguar XJ8 25%
Mercedes-Benz CL-Class 22%
Kia Rio 22%
Audi A8 21%
Lexus LS 21%
Suzuki Verona 21%
Volvo C70 20%
Hyundai Accent 20%
Audi A4 20%
Audi A6 20%

NADA Market Report: Premium Luxury Vehicles Show Highest Annual Depreciation Rate
Replacement Levels and Customer Preference for Latest Models Drive
Depreciation
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2008 | 11:45 PM
  #2  
XeroK00L's Avatar
XeroK00L
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,813
Likes: 1
From: The Bay Area, CA, USA
Default

Sad to see the LS up there. Wonder how much less the S-Class and the 7-Class depreciate. BTW here the link:
http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/06/n...-depreciation/

And shouldn't this be in Car Chat?
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 07:54 AM
  #3  
D.Jobin's Avatar
D.Jobin
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 0
From: Coral Springs, FL
Default

I'm also sad to see the LS up there. As for Jag, thats a no brainer. I bought my S-Type wholesale for $27,900 and traded it in not even 2 years later for $13,500
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 10:40 AM
  #4  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
CL Community Team
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 80,810
Likes: 3,998
Default

I'm not surprised the LS is on there.

As much as I like the LS it's obvious to me they cut costs on it, particularly on the exterior which has so little trim details. Maybe that was a design as well as cost goal, but I think the LS, while a wonderful car, loses quite a bit of its 'impact' unless it's shiny new.

An S-class, to me at least, retains more impact as it ages.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 10:50 AM
  #5  
mkiiina's Avatar
mkiiina
Rookie
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
From: tx
Default

im not sure that the domestic depreciation is as bad as you think in the first year. trucks keep their value fairly well, especially here in TX. I think that what really happens is that they have higher depreciation over all the years, not just the first.

still not too suprised that the LS is on there, they are a niche market. Any suprised that there are no Mazda units on the list?
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 10:53 AM
  #6  
Gojirra99's Avatar
Gojirra99
CL Community Team
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 30,277
Likes: 354
From: Canada
Default

That's just for one year, over longer periods, things might be different ? . . .
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 11:02 AM
  #7  
bruceko's Avatar
bruceko
Driver
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 104
Likes: 2
From: Washington
Default

Great but I haven't seem any used non Lev Ls460's for sale at $53000
I am waiting to buy
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 11:05 AM
  #8  
XeroK00L's Avatar
XeroK00L
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,813
Likes: 1
From: The Bay Area, CA, USA
Default

Originally Posted by Gojirra99
That's just for one year, over longer periods, things might be different ? . . .
The LS460 hasn't been on sale for a full year so I suppose the said LS depreciation is regarding the LS430 in the last year of its product cycle? That might explain it then.

EDIT: Oops my bad the LS460 has been on sale for well over a year already.

Last edited by XeroK00L; Mar 7, 2008 at 11:09 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 11:12 AM
  #9  
blacksc400's Avatar
blacksc400
Car Chat Moderator
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,146
Likes: 2
From: Las Vegas!
Default

LS holds value better over longer period!
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 11:14 AM
  #10  
XeroK00L's Avatar
XeroK00L
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,813
Likes: 1
From: The Bay Area, CA, USA
Default

Originally Posted by blacksc400
LS holds value better over longer period!
That I believe too, especially after warranty expires.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 11:53 AM
  #11  
encore888's Avatar
encore888
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,695
Likes: 2
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
As much as I like the LS it's obvious to me they cut costs on it, particularly on the exterior which has so little trim details.
While the exterior may be minimalist in some ways, it's been reported that the continuous metal window trim is one of the most expensive single-piece items on the LS.

I'd like to see the numbers for the rest of the luxury segment, and over several years. For the LS, I'm wondering whether the increase in price has to do with this change, up to the $61,000-$104,000 range. Similarly perhaps because the CL-Class is higher than the S-Class...?
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 11:55 AM
  #12  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Maybe to them, but in the real world, those prices are holding....odd....
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Toys4RJill
Car Chat
58
Jun 6, 2019 10:20 AM
TableRock
LS - 5th Gen (2018-present)
0
Sep 14, 2018 12:54 PM
EZZ
IS - 3rd Gen (2014-present)
8
Feb 19, 2016 08:17 AM
Gojirra99
Car Chat
4
Jan 7, 2008 10:46 AM
LexFather
LS - 4th Gen (2007-2017)
20
Dec 5, 2006 01:18 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:41 PM.