let's obey speed limit
Originally Posted by PureDrifter
and what are they going to charge them with? the entire point of the film was to show that if even a small percentage of the population obeys the Mandated Speed Limit then this is the effect. you cant really be charged with any kind of reckless endangerment because it is the drivers behind you doing all the stupid things (passing on a hard shoulder for example).
I don't know where they live but here they would have gotten ran over or worst maybe shot for being idiots.
Me and my friends were joking about doing that just yesterday! weird.I agree with d south.
Well this was pre-meditated which they drumed up and wanted to see what would happen. if some common commuters happen to be inadvertently doing the spped limit then it would be different. But these guys put together a plan and they knew what the effects would be. You can see them giggling and laughing about the whole idea.
Originally Posted by cal_alum98
Ummm... quoting from text is a stupid argument?
Sorry, try again.
I know you can and will get a ticket for doing this. My great grandfather (rest his soul) got one for doing 55mph in the fast lane (back when 55mph was the speed limit). The officer told him that he was obstructing traffic.
Sorry, try again.I know you can and will get a ticket for doing this. My great grandfather (rest his soul) got one for doing 55mph in the fast lane (back when 55mph was the speed limit). The officer told him that he was obstructing traffic.
Re your great-grandfather, he was stop probably back in the days when quotas were still legal. Just because your great-grandfather was stopped and given a ticket doesn't mean it was valid.
Also, just because one is pulled over and not given a ticket, doesn't mean the officer was nice and let one go. The nice officer may not have a reason to give a ticket since no violation may have occurred! I was pulled over by a cop when I passed him because he was going below the speed limit (and I do it all the time too!). I was not given a ticket no matter how much he wanted to because he COULD NOT. I was below the speed limit but I hurt his feelings when I passed him.
Here in IL we have a law that states
"when driving on an interstate highway or full access controlled freeway, a person may not drive in the left lane, except when passing another vehicle. Exceptions include when no other vehicle is directly behind the vehicle being driven in the left lane, when traffic conditions/congestion make it impractical to drive in the right lane, when weather conditions make it necessary to use the left lane, when there is an obstruction or hazard in the right lane, or when the driver is changing lanes to yield to emergency or construction vehicles."
So had they done this in IL, they would have been breaking the law. Something tells me that wherever they did it has a similar law.
My point is..
Wrong way to try and prove a point.
"when driving on an interstate highway or full access controlled freeway, a person may not drive in the left lane, except when passing another vehicle. Exceptions include when no other vehicle is directly behind the vehicle being driven in the left lane, when traffic conditions/congestion make it impractical to drive in the right lane, when weather conditions make it necessary to use the left lane, when there is an obstruction or hazard in the right lane, or when the driver is changing lanes to yield to emergency or construction vehicles."
So had they done this in IL, they would have been breaking the law. Something tells me that wherever they did it has a similar law.
My point is..
Wrong way to try and prove a point.
well these guys did it to prove a point
that no body is happy with the current speed limit and we should raise them
which im fine with
just the way they decided to make their point pisses off the ppl that the point benefits...
that no body is happy with the current speed limit and we should raise them
which im fine with
just the way they decided to make their point pisses off the ppl that the point benefits...
Looks like several offenses to me: (Your local state traffic laws may vary.)
Obstruction of a traffic lane, or impeding the flow of traffic. – depending on what they call a “rolling blockade” in your state, that’s the ticket they give you for organizing this little stunt.
Failure to yield, or passing lane violation, depending on local laws, it is independent of the posted limit.
The other violations would go to intent, IMHO – the intent here could easily be proven to be willful obstruction, perhaps conspiracy, given the planning and coordination of the operation - with the evidence of the video..
Then there was the accident and the property damage to which they were at least a significant contributor.
If the defense even mentions an attempt to slow traffic to the legal limit, the prosecutor will kindly inform them that private citizens are not to enforce the law, and they could be charged with vigilantism.
Of course, the video would just be the last nail in their coffin. Thanks for posting the evidence on the internet, Bozo . . .
OOPSY! Brad and Mimsy might have to go to PUBLIC school next year. . . after Daddy gets the bill and the lawsuits. Or maybe the county lockup has a correspondence program. Oh, and I’d flunk them on their “video” too.
Obstruction of a traffic lane, or impeding the flow of traffic. – depending on what they call a “rolling blockade” in your state, that’s the ticket they give you for organizing this little stunt.
Failure to yield, or passing lane violation, depending on local laws, it is independent of the posted limit.
The other violations would go to intent, IMHO – the intent here could easily be proven to be willful obstruction, perhaps conspiracy, given the planning and coordination of the operation - with the evidence of the video..
Then there was the accident and the property damage to which they were at least a significant contributor.
If the defense even mentions an attempt to slow traffic to the legal limit, the prosecutor will kindly inform them that private citizens are not to enforce the law, and they could be charged with vigilantism.
Of course, the video would just be the last nail in their coffin. Thanks for posting the evidence on the internet, Bozo . . .
OOPSY! Brad and Mimsy might have to go to PUBLIC school next year. . . after Daddy gets the bill and the lawsuits. Or maybe the county lockup has a correspondence program. Oh, and I’d flunk them on their “video” too.
Originally Posted by UberNoob
well these guys did it to prove a point
that no body is happy with the current speed limit and we should raise them
which im fine with
...
that no body is happy with the current speed limit and we should raise them
which im fine with
...
Even in Germany, the traditional land of no speed limits, the authorities have been forced to regulate more and more stretches of Autobahn because of congestion, where triple-digit-speeds would be a disaster.
Last edited by mmarshall; Aug 7, 2006 at 09:59 AM.
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 81,854
Likes: 446
From: Lovely OC
Originally Posted by cliffud
did any of you guys see THE OTHER VIDEOS THAT THEY DID???
This isn't just a one off event... they do this consistently!!
This isn't just a one off event... they do this consistently!!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post













