When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
lol, i'd read about that but didn't know if it was just fake news.
It is new section that just opened up this year. For many, it's the last stop before hitting NorCal, and also Harris Ranch is next door, known for its Steakhouse (and farms with thousands of cows....you can imagine the smell in the summer ). It can get packed during holiday travels, so Tesla installed Diesel generators to handle the load of all those 250 kW chargers on days when its packed. Its literally in the middle of nowhere, the nearest city is an hour away so it makes sense. I'm sure they are going to eventually install solar panels like they have done on several of their other charing areas like Firebaugh and Kettleman City, which are further South off the 5 freeway
As to the difference between what it takes to travel in my gas car and our Tesla, our gas car would save us about 20 to 30 minutes on total travel time, but cost at least $100 more in gas
so you're saying 380mi. trip costs you $100 more for gas than electric including supercharging cost.
Originally Posted by patgilm
So here is an interesting take on this. I took a road trip yesterday which was 200 miles round trip and I left with 50% charge and i got to my destination with under 10% charge so I had to stop at a Tesla super charger and to get it back up to 50% it cost me $17. So to drive about 200 miles if I used a supercharger only it would have cost me $34.
My X7 can get about 430 miles of highway driving on a full tank which costs me $80 to fill up so to do the same trip it would have cost me $40. Not as much savings as one thinks on a road trip. Charging at home sure, but not solely on super chargers.
so you're saying 200mi. trip costs you $6 more for gas than electric including supercharging cost.
trying to reconcile these two different anecdotes.
Originally Posted by AMIRZA786
so Tesla installed Diesel generators to handle the load of all those 250 kW chargers on days when its packed. Its literally in the middle of nowhere, the nearest city is an hour away so it makes sense. I'm sure they are going to eventually install solar panels like they have done on several of their other charing areas like Firebaugh and Kettleman City, which are further South off the 5 freeway
i'm sure you can do the math, but your home provides what, 12kW ? charging over several hours from your roof of solar cells, so providing 250kW to say 30 cars at once is 7500kW or 60x your home solar output, in other words, a huge solar farm. i don't see that happening. yes they can use batteries to store captured sunlight but that will be an enormous bank and cost.
so you're saying 380mi. trip costs you $100 more for gas than electric including supercharging cost.
so you're saying 200mi. trip costs you $6 more for gas than electric including supercharging cost.
trying to reconcile these two different anecdotes.
i'm sure you can do the math, but your home provides what, 12kW ? charging over several hours from your roof of solar cells, so providing 250kW to say 30 cars at once is 7500kW or 60x your home solar output, in other words, a huge solar farm. i don't see that happening. yes they can use batteries to store captured sunlight but that will be an enormous bank and cost.
No, the round trip, 380 miles x2 costs me maybe $60 or $70 less, especially with the cost of gas hitting nearly $7 between NorCal and SoCal. If I leave with a full tank, I'll be spending at least $140 for the round trip. So realistically without going back and looking at what I spent on my trip, I would save about $60. Not a lot, but it's something that adds up over time.
It's not about generating electricity for real time charging, but storing energy for use during peak. They added solar for several of their other sites, I don't see why they wouldn't do it here
Last edited by AMIRZA786; Sep 10, 2023 at 07:03 PM.
For the heck of it, I went back and looked at my last two trips to SoCal, the first one was in May when my father passed away. We took our Sienna because my wife's aunt and her two daughters came with us. I spent a total of $133.41.
On June 23rd, we went back to SoCal for my dad's memorial in the Model Y, we spent a total of $83.17
Just to add on to the above post, if you poll most EV owners on this forum (as well as the Polestar forum), most didn't buy an EV for the savings aspect. Performance would always rank at the top. Saving money is way down the line. Most of the savings is from home charging, those who public charge, the savings are still there, but not as significant. And they only exist at all because EV's are so efficient. If you were to convert the cost of kWh's to the cost of a gallon of gasoline, it would be something like $14 a gallon:
1 gallon of gasoline = 33.7 kWh
Average cost of public fast charging = .44 cents kWh
33.7 X .44 cents = $14.78
So even at $5 plus per gallon, gasoline per gallon is cheaper...the difference is EV's don't use as much energy, so if an EV had the ability to store 18 gallons worth of electricity, they would go over 1000 miles on a tank. Getting back to my original point, it's all about performance!
Getting back to my original point, it's all about performance!
ha, well in the thread's poll there's only one vote for speed, so maybe not as big a factor as it is for you.
having just finished my rental in the standard range model 3, i found it to have more than enough "smooth buttery" performance. a performance model would be wasted on me.
ha, well in the thread's poll there's only one vote for speed, so maybe not as big a factor as it is for you.
having just finished my rental in the standard range model 3, i found it to have more than enough "smooth buttery" performance. a performance model would be wasted on me.
Do another poll, and use the word "Performance", and you find that Range and Performance will be at the top. Saving money will be further down the line. Speed can mean a lot of things. Our Previous 2020 Ioniq with 138 hp went "fast", it just took longer.
I look forward to your review! Performance can never be a waste, but I know what you mean . My brother in laws base Model 3 drives extremely well and does the job
I think, as a Tesla owner, the charging network is something that I completely take for granted. My brother in law picked a Rivian R1S last month, and he's already had a few bad experiences with EA chargers not working or being occupied where he can't charge. He is glad he kept his RR Sport to use for his family road trips.
Since I've had the Tesla for a while now, having access to a charger is just something I have come to expect with experience.
I think, as a Tesla owner, the charging network is something that I completely take for granted. My brother in law picked a Rivian R1S last month, and he's already had a few bad experiences with EA chargers not working or being occupied where he can't charge. He is glad he kept his RR Sport to use for his family road trips.
Since I've had the Tesla for a while now, having access to a charger is just something I have come to expect with experience.
It's funny you brought that up. There's a discussion going on in the Polestar forum about charging, most of the experiences bad. I had mentioned that I no longer travel long distances in my Polestar, choosing to take my Y on trips. Since a lot of people on that forum are anti Tesla, people jumped on me saying I have range anxiety. LoL no, I just don't want to deal with ****ty EA charging! When I take my Y to SoCal, it's eventless. There is always chargers available, they are not throttled, and most of all, they actually work! Which is the main reason I bought a Tesla
anyway, how many trips have you made to socal in the y? you only just got it!
I've never stopped at the Harris Ranch chargers. Usually Firebaugh or Kettleman City which is after Harris Ranch. Two trips so far, this upcoming one end of Sept will be #3, which is one reason I'm already at the 5K mark!