Purchase: 1998-2000 SC 400 vs. 2003 Eclipse
Please Help!! My friend was in the market for a car. He wanted a brand new Eclipse, but he is willing to change his decision. He is looking for a two door around $25,000. I brought the SC to his attention and showed him the picture. He loved the design/look. He doesn't know much about cars, but loves to drive. He didn't even know that the Eclipse was front wheel drive. He does want rear wheel drive. Now I kow that the SC 400 is a better car even though used, but can you guys help me with supporting the SC 400 over the Eclipse.
James
Trending Topics
Celebrating Lexus & Toyota from Around the Globe

Toyota is 10x the car of a Mitsubishi or a Honda, hell both combined....
Shawn
Apparently Cadillac has come leaps and bounds!! I remember in the mid 90's when they were considered the most unreliable car ever made, and now they stand at #2, right behind us (although there is a big margin). Lets give them a hand for that!
Apparently Cadillac has come leaps and bounds!! I remember in the mid 90's when they were considered the most unreliable car ever made, and now they stand at #2, right behind us (although there is a big margin). Lets give them a hand for that!
That being said, I am happy to be driving a Lexus, and as it was mentioned earlier, the LexusSC is/was the flagship model of the line (50k and up) so the R&D, materials, techonology are all leaps and bounds ahead of the Mitsu. Plus think about this, he could get a 2k certified SC, have a warranty, clean body/paint, etc, and probably still never have HALF the problems he would have with that Eclipse!
Hell, I'll take a 98 SC4 right about now!









