Notices
SC - 1st Gen (1992-2000)

Semi-Metallic vs. Ceramic

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 21, 2007 | 05:55 AM
  #1  
SuperCoupe400's Avatar
SuperCoupe400
Thread Starter
Intermediate
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 274
Likes: 3
From: MI
Default Semi-Metallic vs. Ceramic

Can someone please give me the 411 on Semi-Metallic vs. Ceramic brake pads? I've always wanted to try the ceramics because of what I've heard about stopping power, but I've also heard that they eat rotors for lunch. I don't know what their longevity is like in comparisson to semi-metallics though. I know one thing's for sure though, I'm tired of wiping my wheels down every 3 or 4 days to keep the brake dust from building. The semi's I've got on there now don't spray dust as badly as an Inifinit G35 sedan or BMW, but I'd rather not have to worry about it.

By the same token, if going ceramic means having rotors that wear down under spec minimal thickness with each pad change, then forget it.

Someone please drop some knowledge on the pros and cons of these, and feel free to make specific recommendations.

Thanks.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2007 | 11:14 AM
  #2  
Rexn30's Avatar
Rexn30
Pole Position
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
From: FL
Default

I'd use ceramic /shrug. Pretty sure the ceramic ones won't have a lot of break dust like the semi. I've never heard of ceramic eatting rotors tho.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2007 | 01:33 PM
  #3  
lexSCus's Avatar
lexSCus
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: California
Default yo

get the greenstuff
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2007 | 03:14 PM
  #4  
TheMole's Avatar
TheMole
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,487
Likes: 5
From: SoCal
Default

OEM pads use a ceramic material. Semi-metallic are more prone to eating the rotors and brake dust. Ceramic ones should be the opposite.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2007 | 03:37 PM
  #5  
vwynn's Avatar
vwynn
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,945
Likes: 53
From: CA
Default

i have semi-metal on now.. they are ok.. mine are sqeeking... even tho they are new.. with brake quiet..
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2007 | 04:56 PM
  #6  
Blizzy's Avatar
Blizzy
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,914
Likes: 2
From: IN
Default

Originally Posted by sc300max
OEM pads use a ceramic material. Semi-metallic are more prone to eating the rotors and brake dust. Ceramic ones should be the opposite.
Amen.

Less brake dust means longer pad life (duh), longer rotor life, and less mess. Ceramic is also less likely to squeak. Well, they are actually just as likely to squak, but the resonance frequency is high pitched to be out of the range of human hearing. As was mentioned, the most user-friendly OEM pads out there are ceramic because they are less hassle.

A good metallic substrate pad will grip harder and fade later, giving you better performance; but that is at the expense of rotor and pad life. A cheap metallic substrate pad (your bargain bin pad) will get out performed by the Ceramic while making dust a-plenty.

Metallic substrate pads are generally considered more "aggressive" than the ceramic substrate. If you are most concerned about the wheels, the suggestion for Greenstuff pads from EBC is a good one. These pads are fully organic and extremely non-corrosive. Although, even they will give more dust than the Redstuff pads from EBC, which are ceramic in nature.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2007 | 05:00 PM
  #7  
Mr Soarer's Avatar
Mr Soarer
Pole Position
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Default

i have the RED stuff ceramic pads. i like it, very low brake dust....
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2007 | 12:06 PM
  #8  
Blk97SC300's Avatar
Blk97SC300
Lead Lap
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

I have LS400 brakes, cross drilled/slotted rotors, with OEM sumitomo ceramic pads. 20,000 miles and still have a lot of life left. Not too much break dust either.

They were cheap too- $34 for the front pads
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2007 | 07:55 PM
  #9  
SCoupe's Avatar
SCoupe
Lexus Test Driver
CL Folding 25,000
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

From what everyone else is saying, this must just be me. When I have used ceramic pads it always resulted in warped rotors, my SC, my Van and older 3 series BMW. I won't use them ever again, three strikes, your out. I use the MKIV TT oem pads and am extremely happy with them. Obviously they may not be a choice for you. Best of luck.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2008 | 03:20 AM
  #10  
JesLet's Avatar
JesLet
Pole Position
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,656
Likes: 6
From: Arizona
Default

Originally Posted by Blk97SC300
I have LS400 brakes, cross drilled/slotted rotors, with OEM sumitomo ceramic pads. 20,000 miles and still have a lot of life left. Not too much break dust either.

They were cheap too- $34 for the front pads
Are these Sumitomos OEM Toyota?
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2008 | 11:31 AM
  #11  
ChronoJ1's Avatar
ChronoJ1
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,265
Likes: 1
From: IL
Default

Green stuff ate away and warped my rotors very quick.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fxturbo
Suspension and Brakes
7
Sep 18, 2018 02:45 PM
Fuzzie
SC430 - 2nd Gen (2001-2010)
5
Feb 6, 2014 11:17 PM
gekae24
ES - 1st to 6th Gen (1990-2018)
3
Apr 8, 2011 09:33 PM
TJW98LS
LS - 1st and 2nd Gen (1990-2000)
2
Apr 10, 2007 09:21 AM
Spitfire86
Wheels, Tires & Brakes Forum
2
Feb 13, 2005 09:17 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:09 PM.