RX - 3rd Gen (2010-2015) Discussion topics related to the 2010 - 2015 RX350 and RX450H models

2012 Venza vs RX 350

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-10-12, 09:23 AM
  #1  
GRPFAN
Pole Position
Thread Starter
 
GRPFAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default 2012 Venza vs RX 350

When shopping for your 2012 RX 350, did anyone check out the 2012 Toyota Venza?

My neighbor just bought new Venza and I got to say their almost a clone to the RX 350 in
size and approx. $12,000 to $14,000 cheaper.

The Venza even offers 80 -90% of the options that are on the RX 350.

I did take one for a drive last fall before deciding on the 350 and was very impressed what
Toyota did to their Venza..

You think Toyota Venza will draw a lot of owners away from paying the extra $$$$ for a RX350??
Old 01-10-12, 09:45 AM
  #2  
InRBigness
Lead Lap
 
InRBigness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: manitoba
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I find the Venza looks like someone stepped on it. The RX is higher in stance and seating posistion. The Venza to me was like a station wagon where as the RX is more like a sport ute. Just my impressions.
Old 01-10-12, 09:47 AM
  #3  
RX_330
Lexus Test Driver
 
RX_330's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,388
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

I don't think it'll take sales away from the RX350 at all. And I don't think it has. The interior, ride, and material quality of the RX350 is leaps and bounds over the Venza.
Old 01-10-12, 10:11 AM
  #4  
MX5NES350
Lead Lap
 
MX5NES350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 781
Likes: 0
Received 100 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Looked at both. Lexus was hands down better if you can afford the extra change
Old 01-10-12, 10:23 AM
  #5  
LexBob2
Lexus Champion
 
LexBob2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 10,987
Received 137 Likes on 111 Posts
Default

I don't think Venza sales hurt RX to any great extent. Sales in 2011 were RX 83K -13%, and Venza 39K -18%. Different buyers and different price points.
Old 01-10-12, 10:38 AM
  #6  
Sfcyclist
Driver
 
Sfcyclist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Ca
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Def not an rx but if you're comparing them loosely. Interior an exterior has major differences and if those are not a factor then comparison maybe close.

In relatively similar type of comparison is the highlander. I'm very impressed with the motor but if you take into account everything else, it's not an Rx.
Old 01-10-12, 10:41 AM
  #7  
Evitzee
Lexus Champion
 
Evitzee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hill Country, TX
Posts: 3,102
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Drove a Highlander and Venza first and then an hour later drove an RX ......not even on the same playing field. Just opening the door of the RX showed it was a much more upscale car than a Venza or Highlander. Waaay too much hard plastic in the Highlander, as well as the Venza.
Old 01-10-12, 11:47 AM
  #8  
Sfcyclist
Driver
 
Sfcyclist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Ca
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Vienza was actually a Lexus when first introduced. I can see why it's now on Toyota line up.

Highlander and Vienza both great cars but not at rx level. Those are both great cars in their categories though!
Old 01-10-12, 12:15 PM
  #9  
Cruiter
Moderator
 
Cruiter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: GA
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

The Vienza was never in the US Lexus line up. Maybe it was for another country but not ours.

It's a different price point for a different customer. I doubt any of the parts have the same part numbers as those on the RX.
Originally Posted by Sfcyclist
Vienza was actually a Lexus when first introduced. I can see why it's now on Toyota line up.

Highlander and Vienza both great cars but not at rx level. Those are both great cars in their categories though!
Old 01-10-12, 12:27 PM
  #10  
GRPFAN
Pole Position
Thread Starter
 
GRPFAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Sfcyclist
.

Highlander and Vienza both great cars but not at rx level. Those are both great cars in their categories though!
I sat in the Highlander before I bought the Lexus but didn't drive one.

The size seem a little larger over the RX 350 which would be nice, but the quality of the RX,
and the styling is why I paid the extra $$$$.

Another reason for me to buy the RX 350 is I keep my cars for at lest 12-15 years before trading.
Not that anything in the Toyota line wouldn't last that long.

Another thing, when I read here why you people chose a Lexus for their quality etc, then 2 years
later trade it off, just don't make sense to me.
Old 01-10-12, 12:34 PM
  #11  
Mark86
Driver School Candidate
 
Mark86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I agree that the Venza is the most similar Toyota model to the RX, but the build quality and materials are far superior in the RX. It seems with Toyota, they offer a few of the advanced features on the Toyota models but you can't have it all. For example, I noticed that you could get the HID headlights with auto high beams on a Venza but no rain sensing wipers, auto dimming side mirrors or memory seats. Personally, I feel that the Venza looks more like a station wagon than an SUV.
Old 01-10-12, 02:08 PM
  #12  
py0413
Driver
 
py0413's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: BC
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I checked the Venza out before buying my RX in 2011. I have to say the Venza looks more aggressive especially with its dark-chorme 20" wheels. However, I took a test drive and riding in as a passenger for half an hour; I just don't think it was a comfortable ride. It's almost like they are trying to hard to bring out the sportiness. Very identical to the early build IS-F as they were desperately to compete with the C63 & M3. But the price tag on those Venzas is sure very attractive for what they offer.
Old 01-10-12, 03:27 PM
  #13  
rxsuperman
Driver
 
rxsuperman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: VA
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

We looked hard at the Venza before we bought the RX. 3 reasons we bought the RX instead of Venza: 1) Venza used cheap looking hard plastic material on the dash 2) RX gave a more comfortable and luxury ride than the Venza 3) RX gave a more commanding view than Venza

The bottomline is you get what you paid for.....Venza is not bad consider its price......
Old 01-10-12, 03:28 PM
  #14  
RXSF
Moderator
 
RXSF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 12,044
Likes: 0
Received 69 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

DIfferent buyers so I dont think it has stolen sales from the RX. The RX remains the number 1 selling luxury SUV on the market for many years running now. Sure you might notice some similarities in design, such as the 2nd row fold flat handles in the cargo bay, but as others have mentioned the materials are where they differentiate the most.

Also the Venza was never a Lexus model, and also the Venza is only sold in north america and not overseas.
Old 01-10-12, 04:12 PM
  #15  
kitlz
No, I don't play soccer!
 
kitlz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 6,652
Received 159 Likes on 134 Posts
Default

I looked at both during the 2009 NY Auto Show. When I meandered over to the Venza, the pseudo textured leather and plastic surfaces were an immediate turnoff. I couldn't tell you about how it was equipped because I walked away. That Camry grill on steroids was also too much. But I'm sure for the price the Venza suits some people just fine. I think they come in some nice colors. The RX created the luxury SUV market and continues to dominate like RXSF said. Obviously the Venza has not been much of a threat.


Quick Reply: 2012 Venza vs RX 350



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:58 PM.