Notices
RX - 2nd Gen (2004-2009) Discussion topics related to the 2004 -2009 RX330, RX350 and RX400H models

Navigation pitfalls..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 22, 2007 | 03:11 PM
  #1  
rxovermdx's Avatar
rxovermdx
Thread Starter
Driver
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: IL
Default Navigation pitfalls..

I just bought blue RX350 a month ago w/ navi/bluetooth, 2wd, 18" wheels. Traded in my 06' Pilot EX-L. I am quite disappointed with Navi in RX..it couldn't find my church few miles away, neither by name nor POI. Not to mention poor and slow voice prompts and recognition capability, especially for bluetooth fxn..it would be lot faster and easier to just pick up the phone and call. Anyone agree?

Jim
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2007 | 03:13 AM
  #2  
AM1's Avatar
AM1
Lexus Champion
CL Folding 100,000
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,789
Likes: 1
From: So CaL
Default

plus all the limitations like not being able to input when the car is moving, that stupid "i agree screen".....could be worse the nav in the rx330 has even more issues.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2007 | 01:22 PM
  #3  
RXSF's Avatar
RXSF
CL Community Team
15 Year Member
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Community Builder
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,470
Likes: 196
From: San Francisco, CA
Default

whoa whoa slow down there big guys

i love my rx330 nav. and ive driven the RX350 newest nav version. there are some tips and tricks you need to learn

NEVER imput the name of a POI or address first.
ALWAYS imput the city FIRST

bluetooth might be due to your phone
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2007 | 02:30 PM
  #4  
rxovermdx's Avatar
rxovermdx
Thread Starter
Driver
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: IL
Default

unless you have contacts memorized in quick dial, you need at least 6 steps to make a call while driving;

1. push I agree,
2. push off-hook
3. push back arrow on screen to get dial numbers
4. push command for voice recogn.
5. say the numbers (slowly and correctly)
6. then push off-hook AFTER voice promt ends.

I do admit, receiving a call is a cake...
RXSF, I have Cingular SYNC, there is nothing wrong with my bluetooth fxn or connectivity.

J
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2007 | 02:33 PM
  #5  
rxovermdx's Avatar
rxovermdx
Thread Starter
Driver
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: IL
Default

RXSF, I will try inputting City first, we will see if it works.. (Navi). Thanks for info. on that.

J
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2007 | 09:25 PM
  #6  
AM1's Avatar
AM1
Lexus Champion
CL Folding 100,000
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,789
Likes: 1
From: So CaL
Default

you shouldnt have to do certain tricks to get it to work better. i also hate how when you enter number street names a lot of times it cant find it. such a 269th street for example.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2007 | 06:17 PM
  #7  
Frankr66's Avatar
Frankr66
Pole Position
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
From: CT
Default

look at the bright side your driving a Lexus instead of a Honda
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2007 | 07:18 PM
  #8  
motoman's Avatar
motoman
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Default

I have to agree on the Nav system. I had a $400 tom, tom 300 in my jeep before my lexus 400H, and it puts the Nav. System to shame on the lexus. Out of the box, the tom tom is ready to use by anyone, and I mean anyone in 5 minutes or less. You also have the choice of over 25+ voices and a little bit of humor to add. Very disappointed in the nav system. Motoman
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2007 | 05:41 AM
  #9  
The G Man's Avatar
The G Man
Lexus Test Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,775
Likes: 119
From: MA
Default

Honda / Acura have the best factory NAV on the market right now, I think its made by Alpine. The best potable NAV on the market right now is the Garmin Nuvi, it has the best reciever on the market and its much better than the Lexus or the Acura NAV. The Garmin is $350 and the Lexus NAV is over $2000. For someone who use the NAV maybe 3 or 4 times a year, its a no brainer, and I can move the Garmin from car to car.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2007 | 04:16 PM
  #10  
RXSF's Avatar
RXSF
CL Community Team
15 Year Member
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Community Builder
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,470
Likes: 196
From: San Francisco, CA
Default

is that what the G man stands for? Garmin? Do you work for them?! haha

the problem with portable navs are that they are ugly. period. Nothing can be said to rebuttle that fact. They stick out of the dash, and they look small and too busy.

as for the lexus nav. It is constantly being rated the easiest, best navigation (in a car) that you can get.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2007 | 04:23 PM
  #11  
rxovermdx's Avatar
rxovermdx
Thread Starter
Driver
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: IL
Default

RXSF, obviuosly you are not aware of the EASE of operating Garmin...looks are important but will not as much as functionality. I think Honda/Lexus need to make more user-friendly Navi. One positive note, integrated back-up camera.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 06:10 AM
  #12  
The G Man's Avatar
The G Man
Lexus Test Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,775
Likes: 119
From: MA
Default

Originally Posted by RXSF
is that what the G man stands for? Garmin? Do you work for them?! haha

the problem with portable navs are that they are ugly. period. Nothing can be said to rebuttle that fact. They stick out of the dash, and they look small and too busy.

as for the lexus nav. It is constantly being rated the easiest, best navigation (in a car) that you can get.
Portable units are an eye sore but they are more functional and you can move them from car to car. They cost 10 times less than the factiry unit and works better, I think the advantage out weights the disadvantage. The lexus nav. is not the best factory nav. on the market and I would not say it is easy to use.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 06:36 AM
  #13  
anulex's Avatar
anulex
Pole Position
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
From: CT
Default

Originally Posted by Frankr66
look at the bright side your driving a Lexus instead of a Honda
huh? what does this mean? I Own a lexus and an Acura. i can you tell the Acura is more fun to drive but the Lexus is more comfortable
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 06:44 AM
  #14  
The G Man's Avatar
The G Man
Lexus Test Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,775
Likes: 119
From: MA
Default

Lexus are also built better, Hondas are more fun to drive until it falls apart on you in 2 or 3 years.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 07:39 AM
  #15  
asianrage's Avatar
asianrage
Driver
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
From: WA
Default

Originally Posted by The G Man
Toyota are also built maybe the same or not better, Hondas are more fun to drive until it falls apart on you in 2 or 3 years.
FIXED
And how biased are you. My experiences with Hondas proved otherwise.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:40 PM.