Notices
RC F (2015-present) Discussion topics related to the RC F model

RC-F vs. M4 - Weight, Build and Reliability

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 1, 2016 | 07:52 AM
  #1  
lexusnutt's Avatar
lexusnutt
Thread Starter
Intermediate
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 407
Likes: 38
From: SC
Default RC-F vs. M4 - Weight, Build and Reliability

Looks, price and perceived prestige are another topic. I'm talking about meat and potatoes so please let's not derail this thread.

There seems to be quite the discussion and/or disappointment on the weight of the RC-F and other cars in this class (specifically the M4), not only from the media, but from some owners.

Weight
So what is it that makes it so bloated? Is it extra sound deadening that gives it its quiet ride? Interior material quality? Is the naturally aspirated V8 overall heavier than a turbocharged inline 6 cyl.? Safety features including good crash test data? Does anyone have this information?

Build and Reliability
The RC-F has good crash test ratings and no recalls
http://www.cars.com/lexus/rc-f/2015/safety-ratings/
Crash Test

The 2015 M4 is listed with no crash data information and currently has 1 recall:
http://www.cars.com/bmw/m4/2015/safety-ratings/
Crash Test (partial video)

IMO, a couple of 10ths in a Q mile is negligible when you're looking at ride comfort, quietness, safety and reliability.

Last edited by lexusnutt; Jul 1, 2016 at 07:53 AM. Reason: Edited RCF video link
Old Jul 1, 2016 | 08:19 AM
  #2  
DrRick's Avatar
DrRick
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,395
Likes: 3
From: ATL
Default

First...just because they havent performed the crash test doesnt mean the RC-F's is better (you used a video of the RC350, btw).

Secondly...is a 'recall' of 42 cars really a recall? i mean...i guess it is. i'd never heard of it and i have a 2016...
Old Jul 1, 2016 | 08:30 AM
  #3  
DougHII's Avatar
DougHII
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 818
Likes: 30
From: Nashville
Default

Originally Posted by DrRick
First...just because they havent performed the crash test doesnt mean the RC-F's is better (you used a video of the RC350, btw).

Secondly...is a 'recall' of 42 cars really a recall? i mean...i guess it is. i'd never heard of it and i have a 2016...
Out comes Mr. Sunshine . . . always beaming rays of positivity, especially anything having to do with the RC F.

Last edited by DougHII; Jul 1, 2016 at 08:53 AM.
Old Jul 1, 2016 | 09:14 AM
  #4  
IMCHIA's Avatar
IMCHIA
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 410
Likes: 23
From: Houston, TX
Default

*Grabs popcorn* Subbed.
Old Jul 1, 2016 | 09:19 AM
  #5  
DrRick's Avatar
DrRick
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,395
Likes: 3
From: ATL
Default

Originally Posted by DougHII
Out comes Mr. Sunshine . . . always beaming rays of positivity, especially anything having to do with the RC F.
i'm honored that you look for my posts. sorry i havent been around in few. and i get the sarcasm but could you show me the negativity i posted towards the RC-F? or better yet...respond to the post and not the poster?
Old Jul 1, 2016 | 09:46 AM
  #6  
lexusnutt's Avatar
lexusnutt
Thread Starter
Intermediate
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 407
Likes: 38
From: SC
Default

Originally Posted by DrRick
First...just because they havent performed the crash test doesnt mean the RC-F's is better (you used a video of the RC350, btw).

Secondly...is a 'recall' of 42 cars really a recall? i mean...i guess it is. i'd never heard of it and i have a 2016...
My good Dr.,

FIRST, I did not state the RC-F was better, but stated that the crash tests were rated as "Good".
I'm extremely curious why there are no published crash ratings on the 2015 M4, a car that has been out nearly 2 years.

A recall listed as a recall, is a recall. I merely stated a fact. BTW, the RC350 is the same body if you haven't noticed regardless of the motor.

Finally, your post, as evident by many others you've submitted is non-value added. Move along.
Old Jul 1, 2016 | 09:56 AM
  #7  
DrRick's Avatar
DrRick
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,395
Likes: 3
From: ATL
Default

Originally Posted by lexusnutt
My good Dr.,

FIRST, I did not state the RC-F was better, but stated that the crash tests were rated as "Good".
I'm extremely curious why there are no published crash ratings on the 2015 M4, a car that has been out nearly 2 years.

A recall listed as a recall, is a recall. I merely stated a fact. BTW, the RC350 is the same body if you haven't noticed regardless of the motor.

Finally, your post, as evident by many others you've submitted is non-value added. Move along.
well thats just rude...
Old Jul 1, 2016 | 10:13 AM
  #8  
DaveGS4's Avatar
DaveGS4
Administrator Emeritus
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 31,944
Likes: 2,737
From: North Carolina
Default

The RC-F vs M4 topic has been discussed ad nauseum and since this has turned personal and rude....
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CraigMak
RC F (2015-present)
33
Jun 26, 2019 08:40 AM
spwolf
Car Chat
7
Jan 30, 2012 09:11 AM
LexFather
Car Chat
12
Sep 17, 2006 12:55 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:03 PM.