Notices
Performance Forced induction, intakes, exhausts, torque converters, transmissions, etc.

MAPECU3, PPE headers dyno

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 12, 2012 | 07:09 AM
  #76  
MRxSLAYx's Avatar
MRxSLAYx
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,148
Likes: 0
From: Aventura, Florida
Default

Nice Find HKS350 and good read.

I made a mistake in an earlier post...

For this setup, they are actually using port injection.
Reply
Old May 12, 2012 | 07:14 AM
  #77  
mbeach's Avatar
mbeach
Rookie
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 66
Likes: 1
From: UT
Default

Originally Posted by HKS350
I have always loved this write up on the 2gr-fse and this will apply directly the the 2UR also in the IS-F

http://www.sae.org/automag/techbrief...1-114-1-17.pdf

It talks (pg18) about the design of the combustion chamber and the almost impossible task it was for Denso/ yahama to produce a DI injector for this motor.


These are also sleaved blocks, so power output may reach double but much over that will produce broken rods.

The 2JZ has a solid deck. That happens to be cast iron. This is the difference also.

I predict from my magic ball that the head gasket will blow from the bottom end moving around, a condition caused by the open deck alu. Block design.

This motor will never be a powerhouse because of these very design flaws. And the same applies to the ISF motor. Sorry but look at all open deck designs that may apply to anything north of 700hp. You'll see motors that fail often

Hate away fellla's......
Good read, but all this DI headache for a whopping 7% increase over the FE engine (and don't forget the "Lexus Sounds"!). I forget sometimes that we're dealing with Japanese engineers, who have a different mindset on a number of things. They like to do things "just to prove they can," where American engineers are most often driven by the demands of the bean-counters.

The DVVT-i 1GR-FE in the wife's 4Runner sounds like a better candidate for FI than this "performance" motor.

As for open vs. closed deck, you might be on to something. I doubled HP on an EJ20 and I suspect that block sees a fair bit more squirm than any V block. I also think that this motor has some kind of reinforcement in there.
Reply
Old May 12, 2012 | 07:19 AM
  #78  
06isDriver's Avatar
06isDriver
Thread Starter
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 3
From: Louisiana
Default

Originally Posted by HKS350
This motor will never be a powerhouse because of these very design flaws. And the same applies to the ISF motor. Sorry but look at all open deck designs that may apply to anything north of 700hp. You'll see motors that fail often

Hate away fellla's......


why you gotta **** in the lemonade???


just messin, facts is facts
Reply
Old May 12, 2012 | 07:11 PM
  #79  
clubfoot's Avatar
clubfoot
Advanced
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 651
Likes: 3
From: Ontario
Default

Originally Posted by Kurtz
You realize the rav4 is FWD right? so it's not gonna mate with anything. It's the 2GR-FE, same engine as used in the ES350, RX350, Avalon, Camry, and other FWD Toyota/Lexus offerings.

And if you were doing an engine swap you might as well just put a 2JZ in there.
So what if it's FWD and AWD, the only thing that matters is the bolt pattern on the bell housing?! Even the 3SGTE can be converted to RWD!
Reply
Old May 12, 2012 | 08:35 PM
  #80  
Kurtz's Avatar
Kurtz
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,810
Likes: 14
From: NC
Default

Originally Posted by clubfoot
So what if it's FWD and AWD, the only thing that matters is the bolt pattern on the bell housing?! Even the 3SGTE can be converted to RWD!
The 3SGTE was actually used on some RWD cars FWIW

The 2GR-FE is a transverse mounted V6 used only in FWD applications.... certainly you could convert it to fit/work in a RWD car... but I'm not sure why you would. If bothering to do an engine swap for power why wouldn't you swap in a way stronger RWD engine like a 2JZ-GTE?
Reply
Old May 14, 2012 | 06:43 PM
  #81  
clubfoot's Avatar
clubfoot
Advanced
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 651
Likes: 3
From: Ontario
Default

The 2GR would be staying within the "same" family of V6 engines whereas the 2JZ, would be much more difficult to fit, weigh more, affect the weight distribution/handling (unless you do some cutting) and be more difficult. Unless that's you're intended direction.

Of course, you'll gain the use of a manual trans with more modifications,....etc,...etc. Having stuffed a Jaguar 4.2L straight six with auto and E-Type independent rear end in the back of a Morris Marina I have a pretty good idea of what it takes to do major mods.

The intent of my suggestion is to keep it as simple and straight forward as possible... it may be easier to just trade up to an F. But,....you'd just have another F
Reply
Old May 14, 2012 | 08:09 PM
  #82  
mbeach's Avatar
mbeach
Rookie
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 66
Likes: 1
From: UT
Default

Originally Posted by clubfoot
... it may be easier to just trade up to an F. But,....you'd just have another F
Well said Sir.
Reply
Old May 15, 2012 | 10:15 PM
  #83  
ISF4life's Avatar
ISF4life
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,063
Likes: 165
From: SoCal714
Default

Really ? 8 speed and paddle shifters ? and this 448whp to 600whp possibilities .
https://www.clublexus.com/forums/is-...-a-newbie.html
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2013 | 09:33 PM
  #84  
JDSmith7o2's Avatar
JDSmith7o2
Driver School Candidate
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: NV
Default

bump. + has destrocking already been covered? if not would it make a plausable route? its been done to an ser spec v to produce roughly 600hp.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2013 | 08:40 PM
  #85  
WylieKylie's Avatar
WylieKylie
Lead Lap
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 624
Likes: 31
From: UT
Default

I think de-stroking the engine is a complete non-starter. The reason you de-stroke an engine is to reduce the speed of the pistons and thus load on the rotating assembly (rods mostly) at high engine RPM, which gives the mechanicals in the engine the ability to rev higher without breaking.

By doing so you inherently give up some torque. How are you going use the ability to rev higher to make up that deficit?

Last edited by WylieKylie; Sep 9, 2014 at 03:15 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2013 | 05:32 PM
  #86  
4grDrvr's Avatar
4grDrvr
Driver School Candidate
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Default

Great build! sad someone had to take it away from you...
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2014 | 09:39 AM
  #87  
nikogio38's Avatar
nikogio38
Pole Position
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 367
Likes: 3
From: ca
Default

Need some help I'm planning on installing mapecu on my is350 but need help in regards to the harness jumper I'm going have made for me. How long did you have them make the harness for you? And second where did you locate the mapecu??
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2022 | 05:59 AM
  #88  
djr48312's Avatar
djr48312
Pit Crew
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 129
Likes: 7
From: TX
Default

With MAPECU3 I was seeing many are removing the O2's, but wouldn't MAPECU3 allow you to tune your closed loop operation to not be in stoich ( 14.7:1 ) to something better for boost such as 13:1 or so?
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2022 | 08:32 PM
  #89  
jgscott's Avatar
jgscott
Lexus Champion
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 12,610
Likes: 1,935
From: GA
Default

Did the op who started this thread ever get back to the Dyno and get the new numbers?
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2022 | 08:44 PM
  #90  
00goobs's Avatar
00goobs
Intermediate
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 453
Likes: 140
From: Tx
Default

I have a mapecu3 in case I want to do turbo piggyback. It seems easy to tune and does have features to lock the O2 voltage into the stock ECU and try to keep the mapecu in control.

It does control the ignition coils directly which helps in tuning....
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:04 AM.