LMS Intake dynograph vs Basline dynograph
**edit** I forgot to mention that there was no disconnecting of the battery before any of the dyno's or after. Original baseline dyno was done a few weeks ago, installed the LMS intake over a week ago and have about 300miles on the car with the LMS intake so my ECU has learned the new intake modification and has adjusted appropriately. These are real results with no tricks played like doing a dyno right after installing the intake or resetting the ECU, which almost always yields gains due to the car running leaner until the ECU learns.
Positives:
1. I didn't lose any peak power
2. LMS intake makes more power throughout the rpms all the way until 6000rpm
3. LMS intake makes FELT power in the lower rpms. (Butt dyno confirmed!)
3. This intake sounds great!
4. This intake looks great!
Negatives:
1. On a dyno it is hard to acurately test how much of an improvment it is over stock (airlfow)
2. Some people may not like the extra noise the intake makes
Videos:
Dyno 1. This is what happens if you try to step on the gas too early. Downshifts!!
Dyno 1
Dyno 2. . Longer version of one of my earlier dynos today. (notice no blue fan)
Dyno 2
Dyno 3. This is my best dyno of the day. Notice the smaller blue fan that I had to add
Dyno 3
-
Last edited by caymandive; Feb 16, 2006 at 06:47 PM.
Trending Topics
Celebrating Lexus & Toyota from Around the Globe
The car actually moving would benifit the stock intake more so then the LMS since it has ducting directed towards the front of the car to give it a "ram air" effect. The LMS intake seems to be not only much more isolated from cool ambient air than the stock intake, but also doesn't appear to benifit as much if at all when the car is in motion as the stock intake does.













