Notices
IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013) Discussion about the 2006+ model IS models

New IIHS Crash Test

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 14, 2012 | 04:27 AM
  #1  
Duke02's Avatar
Duke02
Thread Starter
Driver
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: NC
Default New IIHS Crash Test

Saw this today. It's a new partial-offset crash test and we didn't do to well..


http://www.autoblog.com/2012/08/14/i...-1995-w-video/
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2012 | 04:37 AM
  #2  
silvaIS's Avatar
silvaIS
Intermediate
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 471
Likes: 10
From: Staten Island NY
Default

pretty interesting...hope lexus has enough time to make the changes for the new redesigned IS
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2012 | 04:54 AM
  #3  
Menthol's Avatar
Menthol
Rookie
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Wow, I always thought our IS would do well on crash test. Safety was another reason I considered a european luxury, but it doesnt beat our IS reliability!
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2012 | 05:42 AM
  #4  
iRyan's Avatar
iRyan
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,473
Likes: 8
From: South Fl.
Default

Damn that lexus dummy was damn near dead...we need to fix that asap
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2012 | 06:56 AM
  #5  
imherenow's Avatar
imherenow
Racer
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,770
Likes: 16
From: TX, CA
Default

from that video the IS gave 3rd class type performance.so sad ..why cant they spent more time in safety like volvo too. They do have great style, comfort, good enough performance, .why not focus on safety ALL around ( like Volvo for example) i think its the idea when you think of certain car companies some things pop right up and safety aint one of them for Lexus. and i think it will stay like that.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2012 | 07:22 AM
  #6  
stanjohn12's Avatar
stanjohn12
Advanced
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 598
Likes: 1
From: Kuwait
Post

Oh my God !!! That's bad . A big negative for Lexus.

One thing you can learn from this video though is don't crash your car partially from the front side. Go straight full head on. I think that will protect us better.

Last edited by stanjohn12; Aug 14, 2012 at 07:34 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2012 | 08:01 AM
  #7  
Herofmine's Avatar
Herofmine
Pole Position
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: NY
Default

I think when they did crash test before for our cars, it wasn't this bad, so it means older IS models are more stronger than 2012?

2006-2008 year models.

Last edited by Herofmine; Aug 14, 2012 at 08:20 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2012 | 08:23 AM
  #8  
ISThree's Avatar
ISThree
Lead Lap
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 549
Likes: 1
From: CA
Default

did i heard that right?
"one of the worst performer in this test..."
Lexus will need to make sure take a good look ASAP!
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2012 | 08:26 AM
  #9  
My0gr81's Avatar
My0gr81
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 2
From: Ontario
Default

From the link:

"The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has unveiled a new crash testing methodology in dramatic fashion"

"Most automakers design their vehicles to ace our moderate overlap frontal test and NHTSA's full-width frontal test, ..."

Testing method has changed, and they know that most cars on the market won't fare well until redesigns hit the road.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2012 | 08:57 AM
  #10  
stanjohn12's Avatar
stanjohn12
Advanced
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 598
Likes: 1
From: Kuwait
Default

Check out the full scores of all the cars below , ES 350 is even much worse.

http://www.worldcarfans.com/11208144...eo/lowphotos#7
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2012 | 09:04 AM
  #11  
stanjohn12's Avatar
stanjohn12
Advanced
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 598
Likes: 1
From: Kuwait
Smile

Originally Posted by Herofmine
I think when they did crash test before for our cars, it wasn't this bad, so it means older IS models are more stronger than 2012?

2006-2008 year models.
That's a full frontal crash. The new crash tests are from the front sides where there is no adequate protection as shown.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2012 | 09:14 AM
  #12  
Jeff Lange's Avatar
Jeff Lange
Keeping it Real
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 750
From: California
Default

The new test is designed to test vehicles in different ways, the IS did well (very well) in previous tests. The 2012 is the same as the older models.

Jeff
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2012 | 12:25 PM
  #13  
Gville350's Avatar
Gville350
Moderator
10 Year Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 11,576
Likes: 444
From: South Carolina
Default

Solution! Don't drive into a wall! LOL
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2012 | 02:14 PM
  #14  
vicsis250's Avatar
vicsis250
Pole Position
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: Alhambra, CA
Default

I think that the point to this video is first not to drive into a wall J/K but for real this is big deal our cars are horrible at front end crashes and will not hold up this is something to wonder about.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2012 | 02:45 PM
  #15  
s6 4rings's Avatar
s6 4rings
Lead Lap
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Default

This crash is to point out a partial offset, meaning if you hit a wall head on with the front 25% of the vehicle. this type of accident isn't as common, but something to have the media hype up cause they are out of news. Not worried. If I was worried I would have kept my 1983 Volvo 240DL.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:05 AM.