Notices
GX - 1st Gen (2003-2009) Discussion topics related to the 2003 -2009 GX470 models

Transmission Filter/Strainer - replace or no?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 4, 2016 | 01:39 PM
  #16  
co4wheel's Avatar
co4wheel
Pole Position
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 294
Likes: 6
From: Colorado
Default

Originally Posted by chitown40
Breaking the seal on a perfectly well-sealed ATF oil pan IMOP is not necessary. The FSM explains the process for changing the fluid, and no where does it say to drop the pan. If someone wants to because they feel they need to or their transmission has had many years of hard use, then go for it. These trucks are predominantly mall crawlers, so I don't think many have seen extreme use
Your the one who said you were going to clean the filter/screen with break clean. You have to drop the pan to do that. I said it's crazy to clean a $26 part. It's a sealed screen. It's not easy to clean anyway. Just toss it and buy new for that price. If your not dropping the pan then it's a moot point. But cleaning it is silly. Look at the picture, it's a container not a open screen.

Edit. It was Philipf22 that was going to use break clean not you.
Sorry

Last edited by co4wheel; Mar 4, 2016 at 01:47 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2016 | 07:27 AM
  #17  
tacotuesday2044's Avatar
tacotuesday2044
Thread Starter
Driver School Candidate
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 24
Likes: 2
From: il
Default

Originally Posted by co4wheel
Your the one who said you were going to clean the filter/screen with break clean. You have to drop the pan to do that. I said it's crazy to clean a $26 part. It's a sealed screen. It's not easy to clean anyway. Just toss it and buy new for that price. If your not dropping the pan then it's a moot point. But cleaning it is silly. Look at the picture, it's a container not a open screen.

Edit. It was Philipf22 that was going to use break clean not you.
Sorry
Got everything done this weekend. Followed my the originally posted procedures but replaced the strainer.

Thanks for the help everybody.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2016 | 04:20 PM
  #18  
chitown40's Avatar
chitown40
Rookie
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 64
Likes: 3
From: Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by co4wheel
Edit. It was Philipf22 that was going to use break clean not you.
Sorry
Not a problem.
Reply
Old May 26, 2017 | 12:36 PM
  #19  
Matsui's Avatar
Matsui
Intermediate
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 374
Likes: 9
From: MD
Default

Got the transmission fluid replaced today for the first time @145k miles. Went with the Transmission flush method at a Toyota dealer using their BG system and Toyota WS trans fluid. Their lead technician recommended not to open the pan or replace the filter to avoid risks. I have only driven the car about 20 miles and so far so good. I'll report back if I experience any issues in future.
Reply
Old May 26, 2017 | 12:58 PM
  #20  
DiabloX22's Avatar
DiabloX22
Pole Position
 
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 343
Likes: 26
From: Illinois
Default

What risks???? Did he say???? I would like to know! Whatever anyone wants to call it, its job is to collect debris, I would have changed it. Thats just my opinion. Clean fluid going through old debris, doesnt make sense to me. If its serviceable its for a reason. I never heard of a risk involved, get all the junk off the magnets, bottom of the pan, did he say what you would be risking?
Reply
Old May 27, 2017 | 02:37 AM
  #21  
ALAN553's Avatar
ALAN553
Racer
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,563
Likes: 193
From: nj
Default

Originally Posted by Matsui
Got the transmission fluid replaced today for the first time @145k miles. Went with the Transmission flush method at a Toyota dealer using their BG system and Toyota WS trans fluid. Their lead technician recommended not to open the pan or replace the filter to avoid risks. I have only driven the car about 20 miles and so far so good. I'll report back if I experience any issues in future.
there must be a good reason...my Lexus dealer said the same thing using the same system. I am sure they would have no hesitation to pull he pan and add on the extra service for more money if it were necessary. Maybe the system reverses the flush to clean the screen also.
Reply
Old May 27, 2017 | 06:52 AM
  #22  
Matsui's Avatar
Matsui
Intermediate
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 374
Likes: 9
From: MD
Default

Originally Posted by DiabloX22
What risks???? Did he say???? I would like to know! Whatever anyone wants to call it, its job is to collect debris, I would have changed it. Thats just my opinion. Clean fluid going through old debris, doesnt make sense to me. If its serviceable its for a reason. I never heard of a risk involved, get all the junk off the magnets, bottom of the pan, did he say what you would be risking?
With so much debate and info on this forum from both sides, I knew what he meant so I didn't ask to elaborate. Both options have pros and cons so it is really up to you to decide which route you want to go. The risk in general is the debris collected over the years getting loose and going in the wrong places to mess up the transmission.
Reply
Old May 28, 2017 | 09:24 AM
  #23  
LoneHiker's Avatar
LoneHiker
Pit Crew
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 191
Likes: 25
From: CO
Default

I posted my DIY trans flush here, which details most of the issues being discussed:
https://www.clublexus.com/forums/gx-...er-change.html

That thread gets lost because no one stickied it. The filter is a mesh screen, and on my GX, it had collected a very large amount of filings.Constant pressure from fluid pouring through the screen could cause some of that sharp debris to tear the screen over time, and now it's circulating through your transmission. So yes, I would replace the filter every 100k-150k miles.

The method that I used is the most gentle way to do a 100% flush on the transmission, since you're using the transmission to circulate the fluid rather than an external pump. Also, it circulates fluid the proper direction rather than a backflush that would push fluid the wrong way.

It's the only way that I would do a flush (or allow a shop to do one), and it definitely needs to be done before 150k miles. Toyota made a huge mistake in claiming they had developed a lifetime fluid, there is no such thing. And the 3 quart partial flush without dropping the pan is totally inadequate. For example, the magnets on the pan fill up with filings and can no longer do their job. The pan needs to be dropped so you can clean the sludge off of it and clean the filings off the magnets. While you're in there, replacing the filter screen just makes common sense.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2021 | 02:31 PM
  #24  
User 122922's Avatar
User 122922
Pit Crew
 
Joined: Jul 2021
Posts: 180
Likes: 12
Default

just wondering I have the same situation like yours and I’d like to hear what did you do ?

Originally Posted by philipf22
I'm getting conflicting recommendations from Toyota, Lexus, and transmission shops.

My GX is an 05 w/ 115k and it has not had the trans flushed/changed. Never done any towing so it's totally light duty.

Question 1 - is it a filter or a strainer?
Some dealers/shops are saying that the filter in the transmission is just that...a filter. As such it should be changed. Other dealers (including toyota) are saying it's just a screen, and that doing a flush will take care of cleaning the screen.

So I'm trying to figure out who has it right. Even the toyota parts refer to it as a "filter/strainer"

I've got quotes ranging from $250 - $750 for a flush

Question 2 - Fluid
Some are saying Toyota WS isn't as good as MaxxLife. Others are saying I'd be dumb to put anything but Toyota WS in there.


Anybody have recommendations?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
350AWD
GS - 3rd Gen (2006-2011)
8
Oct 31, 2018 12:04 PM
lserlohn
RX - 1st Gen (1999-2003)
6
Apr 11, 2012 10:38 PM
bornpeace
LS - 1st and 2nd Gen (1990-2000)
12
Dec 7, 2010 12:06 PM
cv470
GX - 1st Gen (2003-2009)
6
Oct 15, 2008 09:09 AM
kutscher
Maintenance
17
Nov 17, 2004 02:04 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:02 AM.