GS F (2016-present) Discussion topics related to the GS F model

Adding negative camber?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-13-19, 10:11 PM
  #1  
stormhamme
Rookie
Thread Starter
 
stormhamme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Georgia
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 40 Likes on 21 Posts
Default Adding negative camber?

So wanting to minimize shoulder wear on my tires - it seems the only two ways to really introduce any negative camber is either 1) lowering springs/coilovers or 2) spc rear camber arms, and FIGS upper control arms for the front? I guess theres also megan racing in the space....




I know rechecking my alignment specs is on my list to go so, but thinking in the future as well





Old 07-14-19, 07:00 PM
  #2  
lobuxracer
Tech Info Resource

iTrader: (2)
 
lobuxracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 22,203
Received 3,847 Likes on 2,332 Posts
Default

Camber is not adjustable from the factory. You need something aftermarket to change camber. Lowering isn't a good solution, all it does is put you on a different point in the camber curve, but it doesn't solve the real problem and you really want your camber curve to be optimized for the setup you are running. Believe it or not, there really is a "proper" ride height for the suspension geometry from the factory. Changing ride height arbitrarily may have unintended consequences like creating a roll couple so long that no spring made can overcome it's force. Or you can move the roll center below ground level, or...

Anyway, you need to be very deliberate with ride height changes, and ideally you'd already have measured and modeled the chassis so you can make informed choices, not just throw darts into the dark and hope for something better.
Old 07-15-19, 07:00 AM
  #3  
stormhamme
Rookie
Thread Starter
 
stormhamme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Georgia
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 40 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lobuxracer
Camber is not adjustable from the factory. You need something aftermarket to change camber. Lowering isn't a good solution, all it does is put you on a different point in the camber curve, but it doesn't solve the real problem and you really want your camber curve to be optimized for the setup you are running. Believe it or not, there really is a "proper" ride height for the suspension geometry from the factory. Changing ride height arbitrarily may have unintended consequences like creating a roll couple so long that no spring made can overcome it's force. Or you can move the roll center below ground level, or...

Anyway, you need to be very deliberate with ride height changes, and ideally you'd already have measured and modeled the chassis so you can make informed choices, not just throw darts into the dark and hope for something better.
Certainly. I'm not one to slam a car all nimbly bimbly - usually I never go beyond ~1" drop since it for the most part minimizes the impact - even when I had my NC Miata on Ohlin's it was still only a 1" drop.

That being said, it looks like the only way to dial anything in on the fronts is either a Megan Racing/FIGS upper control arm
Old 07-15-19, 09:50 AM
  #4  
Meraki Autoworks
Your #1 Lexus Vendor
iTrader: (8)
 
Meraki Autoworks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: CA - USA
Posts: 18,478
Received 668 Likes on 590 Posts
Default

We can get you SPC camber arms for the rear. For the front, FIGS and T Demand make a set I believe.

-Josh
__________________

Your #1 Dealer for Aftermarket Performance Products
Orange County, CA
Email: info@merakiautoworks.com
Text/Call: 213 394 2886
Website: www.MerakiAutoworks.com
Old 07-15-19, 12:24 PM
  #5  
lobuxracer
Tech Info Resource

iTrader: (2)
 
lobuxracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 22,203
Received 3,847 Likes on 2,332 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stormhamme
Certainly. I'm not one to slam a car all nimbly bimbly - usually I never go beyond ~1" drop since it for the most part minimizes the impact - even when I had my NC Miata on Ohlin's it was still only a 1" drop.

That being said, it looks like the only way to dial anything in on the fronts is either a Megan Racing/FIGS upper control arm
Supras didn't like even 1mm of drop. They went slower on the track at any ride height below stock. It doesn't mean guys don't lower them, but there's a mechanical performance loss when you do. That's part of why I'm not keen on it unless I know for sure it's going to work. An inch is 25mm. That's huge.
Old 07-15-19, 11:16 PM
  #6  
designo
Pole Position
iTrader: (6)
 
designo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Bahrain
Posts: 3,373
Received 446 Likes on 283 Posts
Default

I am running RSR springs, SPC camber kit on the rear and 20mm rear 25mm front spacers.
I have absolutely no issues.

Do you track your car?

I have had my Hankooks on for over a year now, no inner wear so far.
Old 07-17-19, 06:17 AM
  #7  
stormhamme
Rookie
Thread Starter
 
stormhamme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Georgia
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 40 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lobuxracer
Supras didn't like even 1mm of drop. They went slower on the track at any ride height below stock. It doesn't mean guys don't lower them, but there's a mechanical performance loss when you do. That's part of why I'm not keen on it unless I know for sure it's going to work. An inch is 25mm. That's huge.
That's true. IIRC there's a big difference too if the UCA and LCA are equal vs unequal length too. I'll table the lowering aspect for now.
Old 07-17-19, 06:19 AM
  #8  
stormhamme
Rookie
Thread Starter
 
stormhamme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Georgia
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 40 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by designo
I am running RSR springs, SPC camber kit on the rear and 20mm rear 25mm front spacers.
I have absolutely no issues.

Do you track your car?

I have had my Hankooks on for over a year now, no inner wear so far.
I've only have my car for a month, so not yet. My previous vehicles I all took to the racetrack and did spirited drives in the mountains with.

I'm actually having outer tire wear ( the outside shoulders ) so, I think next steps will be to double check the alignment.
The following users liked this post:
designo (07-20-19)
Old 07-17-19, 01:53 PM
  #9  
lobuxracer
Tech Info Resource

iTrader: (2)
 
lobuxracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 22,203
Received 3,847 Likes on 2,332 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stormhamme
I've only have my car for a month, so not yet. My previous vehicles I all took to the racetrack and did spirited drives in the mountains with.

I'm actually having outer tire wear ( the outside shoulders ) so, I think next steps will be to double check the alignment.
You're probably toed-in too much. Most of the alignment guys default to toe-in on Lexus because they toe out a LOT under braking.
Old 07-17-19, 09:31 PM
  #10  
stormhamme
Rookie
Thread Starter
 
stormhamme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Georgia
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 40 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lobuxracer
You're probably toed-in too much. Most of the alignment guys default to toe-in on Lexus because they toe out a LOT under braking.
Didn't consider that. I'd imagine going to OEM specs, hard braking will equal some front end wiggles
Old 07-17-19, 10:59 PM
  #11  
lobuxracer
Tech Info Resource

iTrader: (2)
 
lobuxracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 22,203
Received 3,847 Likes on 2,332 Posts
Default

No, hard braking and wiggles is front end. All fixed when I went to polyurethane bushings in front.
Old 07-18-19, 04:54 AM
  #12  
TARS
Driver
 
TARS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: FL
Posts: 107
Received 56 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

I would say that lowering the car with the intent of improving its looks is a subjective move that is absolutely fine to do for those that value it for what it is; nothing wrong with pursuing happiness! I think the only problem would be to equate the act of lowering the car with a corresponding equal improvement in performance... it will not happen. I think certain aspects of "performance" could be improved in isolation, but as its usually the case with these things (especially with suspension geometry), it usually comes at the expense of some other aspect of that system.

I wanted to say however that the GS-F could be improve very significantly for better track duty/usa. In everything that I've done, I have yet to touch "height", and probably won't... However, RR-Racing USRS & Competition 2 Piece Brake Rotors, better brake pads, better brake fluid, better rubber (R) compounds, as much of it as possible in all 4 corners, etc. These are example of improvements that if done right, are real and can dramatically change the way the car feel and what it can do where it counts.

In two weeks I'll finish another set of improvements and by the end of November I should be "done" (whatever that means) with Brakes/Suspension & Tires. At that point I was thinking about posting a thread with pictures and numbers on everything I did for that area and my impressions for those that might be interested. I'll tell you preliminary that the most shocking and unexpected improvement so far has been those RR-Racing Competition Brake 2 piece Rotors! I was not expecting at all the changes in temperature that I have been measuring at the track. I have never done a "mod" that has surprised me more on its ability to deliver on the promises that it claims.
The following users liked this post:
designo (07-20-19)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rudebwoy30
IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013)
18
12-17-14 08:15 PM
jgr7
Suspension and Brakes
10
12-23-13 09:25 PM
ozzy250
Suspension and Brakes
3
04-19-13 12:42 PM
Mrbanhbao
Suspension and Brakes
42
04-18-12 11:09 PM
sick
Suspension and Brakes
11
09-06-11 01:43 AM



Quick Reply: Adding negative camber?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:19 AM.