8th generation ES!
- NX 350h – 41 mpg city, 37 mpg highway, 39 mpg combined
- NX 450h+ – 37 miles EV-only range, then 38 mpg city, 33 mpg highway, 36 mpg combined
I might add that we are really enjoying this car. It is very smooth on electric and the 35 - 40 mile range handles any of our local errands. Is it worth the extra cost - hard to say. From a pure economic point of view, probably not. When that battery ultimately needs to be replaced, it will be much more expensive than a standard hybrid so the economics are still a great question. But do I like it well enough to buy another PHEV - YES.
Last edited by TechNut; Jun 7, 2025 at 09:26 AM.
From a purely pragmatic, global business strategy perspective, you're almost certainly right. Lexus is likely just following the money, pivoting to where the volume and growth for this segment now reside. Your point about this reflecting a larger "seismic economic shift" is spot on.
My "squandered opportunity" comment comes from a slightly different, perhaps more product-focused and North American-centric viewpoint. It's the opportunity to continue a specific legacy of design and brand identity that served this market so well, which has now been sacrificed at the altar of that larger global play.
So, in a way, we might be two sides of the same coin. They are seizing a new economic opportunity while, from our perspective as long-time customers here, simultaneously squandering a cherished product heritage. A tough trade-off, and one that many of us are clearly feeling.
Appreciate the sharp insight, as always.
Last edited by radiologym; Jun 8, 2025 at 08:56 AM.
Last edited by radiologym; Jun 8, 2025 at 03:04 PM.
Sorry I'll stop hollering so loudly.
Celebrating Lexus & Toyota from Around the Globe
Higher unsprung weight puts more stress on the suspension, reduces ride quality and tires are more subject to pothole damage
Heavier rotational mass reduces effective power to the wheels and reduces fuel economy
They are much more costly to replace
Higher unsprung weight puts more stress on the suspension, reduces ride quality and tires are more subject to pothole damage
Heavier rotational mass reduces effective power to the wheels and reduces fuel economy
They are much more costly to replace
I will not attempt to argue opinion of what looks better, but physics and engineering say these oversize tires absolutely have more negatives than positives.
Last edited by hotwings; Jun 8, 2025 at 06:52 PM.
I will not attempt to argue opinion of what looks better, but physics and engineering say these oversize tires absolutely have more negatives than positives.
Low Profile Tires vs Potholes
Last edited by radiologym; Jun 8, 2025 at 07:30 PM.














