Notices
ES - 7th Gen (2019-2025) Discussion topics related to 2019-2025 ES models

8th generation ES!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 7, 2025 | 09:22 AM
  #526  
TechNut's Avatar
TechNut
Pole Position
Veteran: Navy
10 Year Member
Shutterbug
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,891
Likes: 837
From: Idaho
Default

Originally Posted by Myshkyn
Assuming the 2024 NX is representative of Lexus plug-ins, once that battery is discharged, a plug-in hybrid operates as a standard hybrid. However, it is not as efficient as the standard hybrid, as you're giving away around three miles per gallon compared to the NX 350h.
  • NX 350h – 41 mpg city, 37 mpg highway, 39 mpg combined
  • NX 450h+ – 37 miles EV-only range, then 38 mpg city, 33 mpg highway, 36 mpg combined
Article by Michael S. Palmer
Agreed. I own an NX 450h+ and I might add a little flavor to this discussion. When I drive over to my mother's city, I switch it to standard HV (Lexus speak for Hybrid Vehicle) on the highway and then once I get to her city, I flip it back to EV mode. My reasoning is that the battery won't survive the entire trip and I don't plan to stay long enough at my mom's to charge it back up. My point is merely that you are able to control which mode it is in as long as you have charge on the battery. Once the battery is down to 30%, it automatically goes to HV and you no longer have any choice. So you can sort of plan your journey to decide where you want to use that 40ish miles of EV travel - it does not have to be at the beginning of your journey.

I might add that we are really enjoying this car. It is very smooth on electric and the 35 - 40 mile range handles any of our local errands. Is it worth the extra cost - hard to say. From a pure economic point of view, probably not. When that battery ultimately needs to be replaced, it will be much more expensive than a standard hybrid so the economics are still a great question. But do I like it well enough to buy another PHEV - YES.

Last edited by TechNut; Jun 7, 2025 at 09:26 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2025 | 09:45 AM
  #527  
UltraLux22's Avatar
UltraLux22
Instructor
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,242
Likes: 624
From: Kentucky
Default

Originally Posted by LexFinally
Great post as usual, Ultra. The only part I disagree with is "squandered opportunity." I think Lexus is just chasing the opportunity that's there for a luxury sedan maker now, and that's no longer in this country. It reflects the seismic economic shift that's going in on the larger world outside the showroom, and increasingly we're no longer the center of that. If anything, the events of this year prove that from an economic perspective, Lexus read the tea leaves correctly. Our nation's fast-accelerating decline in the world hierarchy is going to show up in countless ways, and car design is just one of them.
@LexFinally, that's a sharp and well-reasoned analysis, and frankly, I think you've hit on the difficult truth behind this shift.

From a purely pragmatic, global business strategy perspective, you're almost certainly right. Lexus is likely just following the money, pivoting to where the volume and growth for this segment now reside. Your point about this reflecting a larger "seismic economic shift" is spot on.

My "squandered opportunity" comment comes from a slightly different, perhaps more product-focused and North American-centric viewpoint. It's the opportunity to continue a specific legacy of design and brand identity that served this market so well, which has now been sacrificed at the altar of that larger global play.

So, in a way, we might be two sides of the same coin. They are seizing a new economic opportunity while, from our perspective as long-time customers here, simultaneously squandering a cherished product heritage. A tough trade-off, and one that many of us are clearly feeling.

Appreciate the sharp insight, as always.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2025 | 10:06 AM
  #528  
LexFinally's Avatar
LexFinally
Pole Position
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,533
Likes: 1,358
From: IL
Default

Originally Posted by UltraLux22
Appreciate the sharp insight, as always.
Mutual, I'm sure. Thanks for sharing it, and keep enjoying that glorious Merc.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2025 | 08:54 AM
  #529  
radiologym's Avatar
radiologym
Pit Crew
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 161
Likes: 8
From: Texas
Default

19in is the smallest tire size. If I am looking for the most comfortable ride, will I be able to use tires with bigger sidewalls? I would like to match ride on my 17in ES350 as much as possible.

Last edited by radiologym; Jun 8, 2025 at 08:56 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2025 | 02:53 PM
  #530  
hotwings's Avatar
hotwings
Advanced
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 729
Likes: 289
From: MA
Default

Originally Posted by radiologym
19in is the smallest tire size. If I am looking for the most comfortable ride, will I be able to use tires with bigger sidewalls? I would like to match ride on my 17in ES350 as much as possible.
Are you saying 19" is the smallest tire size available on the 8ES? Have auto makers gone completely insane? I can barely stand the looks and ride of 18" tires. That would have been a show stopper for me.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2025 | 02:59 PM
  #531  
hotwings's Avatar
hotwings
Advanced
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 729
Likes: 289
From: MA
Default

Originally Posted by 703
6th Gen got it right. There’s nothing wrong with being more boxy than cutting into rear headroom.
I completely agree. Car makers have gone past the point of common sense and are catering more to perceived style rather than practicality.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2025 | 03:00 PM
  #532  
radiologym's Avatar
radiologym
Pit Crew
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 161
Likes: 8
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by hotwings
Are you saying 19" is the smallest tire size available on the 8ES? Have auto makers gone completely insane? I can barely stand the looks and ride of 18" tires. That would have been a show stopper for me.
One of the reviewers for preproduction ES mentioned it and I looked up official specs, in disbelief. Pretty much, I was going to buy 2026 until I found out that smallest tire listed is 19in. 20in is the other option. They have gone to extra lengths to make ride more comfortable with larger body and then ruin it with tires??

Last edited by radiologym; Jun 8, 2025 at 03:04 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2025 | 03:05 PM
  #533  
hotwings's Avatar
hotwings
Advanced
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 729
Likes: 289
From: MA
Default

Originally Posted by radiologym
One of the reviewers for preproduction ES mentioned it and I looked up official specs, in disbelief. Pretty much, I was going to buy 2026 until I found out that smallest tire listed is 19in. 20in is the other option. They have gone to extra lengths to make ride more comfortable with larger body and then ruin it with tires??
UNBELIEVABLE. That is INSANELY STUPID.

Sorry I'll stop hollering so loudly.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2025 | 04:07 PM
  #534  
mikemu30's Avatar
mikemu30
Lexus Test Driver
5 Year Member
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 9,556
Likes: 3,397
From: NJ
Default

I'm one of the few that loves the bigger wheels. We have 21s on the RX - love the way they look and the ride is still silky smooth.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2025 | 05:11 PM
  #535  
hotwings's Avatar
hotwings
Advanced
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 729
Likes: 289
From: MA
Default

Even if I could get a brain transplant and somehow like the looks of big wheels, the engineering and physics makes no sense.

Higher unsprung weight puts more stress on the suspension, reduces ride quality and tires are more subject to pothole damage
Heavier rotational mass reduces effective power to the wheels and reduces fuel economy
They are much more costly to replace


Reply
Old Jun 8, 2025 | 05:30 PM
  #536  
mikemu30's Avatar
mikemu30
Lexus Test Driver
5 Year Member
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 9,556
Likes: 3,397
From: NJ
Default

Originally Posted by hotwings
Even if I could get a brain transplant and somehow like the looks of big wheels, the engineering and physics makes no sense.

Higher unsprung weight puts more stress on the suspension, reduces ride quality and tires are more subject to pothole damage
Heavier rotational mass reduces effective power to the wheels and reduces fuel economy
They are much more costly to replace
The mfrs wouldn't be going in this direction if the market felt the same as you! Personal preference really amd ride quality just doesn't suffer. I've driven the RX with smaller wheels. It's not a better ride.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2025 | 06:33 PM
  #537  
hotwings's Avatar
hotwings
Advanced
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 729
Likes: 289
From: MA
Default

Originally Posted by mikemu30
The mfrs wouldn't be going in this direction if the market felt the same as you! Personal preference really amd ride quality just doesn't suffer. I've driven the RX with smaller wheels. It's not a better ride.
If you believe you can trust the direction of the car market, I have a bridge to sell you.
I will not attempt to argue opinion of what looks better, but physics and engineering say these oversize tires absolutely have more negatives than positives.


Last edited by hotwings; Jun 8, 2025 at 06:52 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2025 | 07:08 PM
  #538  
mikemu30's Avatar
mikemu30
Lexus Test Driver
5 Year Member
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 9,556
Likes: 3,397
From: NJ
Default

Been driving with them for more than ten years, in and around midtown Manhattan, FDR, Westside Highway and never an issue. I get it - you wouldn't take the risk. I prefer the look, ride quality to me doesn't suffer and I think I've had one flat in more than ten years and that was due to a nail.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2025 | 07:22 PM
  #539  
radiologym's Avatar
radiologym
Pit Crew
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 161
Likes: 8
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by hotwings
If you believe you can trust the direction of the car market, I have a bridge to sell you.
I will not attempt to argue opinion of what looks better, but physics and engineering say these oversize tires absolutely have more negatives than positives.

Low Profile Tires vs Potholes
yup. I bought 3 Lexus SUVs since my 2007 ES350 and none could glide over potholes like ES. Looks like I will keep that ES for a while longer. If I want to have that ride experience in a newer vehicle, what the last year model ES should I buy when my 2007 finally dies?

Last edited by radiologym; Jun 8, 2025 at 07:30 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2025 | 08:37 PM
  #540  
LexFinally's Avatar
LexFinally
Pole Position
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,533
Likes: 1,358
From: IL
Default

Originally Posted by radiologym
yup. I bought 3 Lexus SUVs since my 2007 ES350 and none could glide over potholes like ES. Looks like I will keep that ES for a while longer. If I want to have that ride experience in a newer vehicle, what the last year model ES should I buy when my 2007 finally dies?
Some folks say probably a 2018.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:27 AM.