General Car Conversation
Yes, a few colleagues of mine are still driving 4Runners from the 1990s. They run forever if you take care of them....although the 80s-vintage ones before that had serious rust problems.
Its crazy to think that Toyota had multi mode 4WD for the first two gen Sequoias and the last two gen 4Rs. But not anymore….would it kill them to just reuse the transfer case part

Last edited by Toys4RJill; Jun 11, 2022 at 08:20 AM.
Its crazy to think that Toyota had multi mode 4WD for the first two gen Sequoias and the last two gen 4Rs. But not anymore….would it kill them to just reuse the transfer case part

When you put a part time 4WD 4R in 4WD, it is the identical thing to my 4WD system when I decide to lock the transfer case.
Last edited by Toys4RJill; Jun 11, 2022 at 09:58 AM.
Celebrating Lexus & Toyota from Around the Globe
Its crazy to think that Toyota had multi mode 4WD for the first two gen Sequoias and the last two gen 4Rs. But not anymore….would it kill them to just reuse the transfer case part

The part time is actually more complicated. The full time is not. Both my full time systems can do everything the part time can…but when not in 4WD lock (same as part time) my full time system does not disconnect it still stays in 4WD but there is never a worry if it will ever go back in 4WD
When you put a part time 4WD 4R in 4WD, it is the identical thing to my 4WD system when I decide to lock the transfer case.
I am now seeing SO MANY chain cars with issues it has solidified my flip from "belts suck, you need to change them" to basically every single chain system gets slack issues and requires engine out to replace the whole system. It's way more expensive and takes longer to do and honestly they only give like 30k miles more than the 1st belt.
It's disturbing but I have now seen it on every VW engine, the LS460, the Chevy 3.6 like crazy, the eco boost and NA ford V6s, all the Honda chain drive engines, all Hyundai engines, etc you get the point. It was shocking to me since I came from domestic pushrod V8s that NEVER have chain issues, I always thought belts suck till I worked long enough to tally belt failures vs chain stretch.
The hesitation issues on the 1UR are from chain stretch causing too much noise OR from valvetrain shock damaging the valve guides. The ford 5.0 has the exact same issues with greater frequency but the reason for the issues is identical. The Mercedes M273/156 also many issues stemming from the chains and DOHC system vs the older M113
Now I'm convinced that belts are better, they also transmit less wear/shock into the cams and crank.
I will be looking at 4 door Wrangler in one of the top trims - there are millions of options and cool colors for them plus the retain their value very well. I see a ton of the new and old ones so they must have decent reliability, obviously not like 4runner.
I find it hard to believe that 30k miles more than the life of the belt I’m going to have chain problems, so 120k everybody has chain problems? I just don’t see that in reality at all














