Consumer Reports Ranks "Most Satisfying" Car Brands
I know this question was not directed at me, but the obvious answer is that Stellantis produces vehicles that are strongly image-based, appeal to those who consider their vehicles an extension of their own personalities (as I am with Buick LOL), and are improving some in reliability compared to their less-than-stellar past. In the case of the Charger and 300, they remain the only large American-badged sedans still in production (the Cadillac CT5 is more of a mid-sizer)....one reason why the 300 sells so well with seniors.
I know this question was not directed at me, but the obvious answer is that Stellantis produces vehicles that are strongly image-based, appeal to those who consider their vehicles an extension of their own personalities (as I am with Buick LOL), and are improving some in reliability compared to their less-than-stellar past.
) and most consumers do consider their vehicles representing their personalities whether subconscious or not (toyota sensible, Dodge Challenger not sensible, lol).
and again, reliability is very different than satisfaction. if a piece of trim has fallen off one can say it wasn't reliable, but if the minivan does great picking up the grungy kids and all their shat from hockey/socker/gymnastics practice day in and day out with no hassles, then it could by HIGHLY satisfying.
so these are the reasons people show high satisfaction on CR surveys? pretty much all brands are 'strongly image-based' (except maybe Mitsubishi
) and most consumers do consider their vehicles representing their personalities whether subconscious or not (toyota sensible, Dodge Challenger not sensible, lol).
) and most consumers do consider their vehicles representing their personalities whether subconscious or not (toyota sensible, Dodge Challenger not sensible, lol).Mitsubishi definitely has an image LOL.
These surveys/reviews are like stock market articles. They have a 50% chance getting it right.
Seriously it’s lame to separate reliability from satisfaction. How can one be satisfied knowing they have potential reliability issues? For me I really like my daily. It’s probably the best daily I have had because I can use for daily purposes and most family/weekend uses. But I’m no where near satisfied. This thing while is nice can go South wihen I least anticipate. On the other hand, I hate to drive my wife’s daily. But I am totally satisfied with the vehicle.
Seriously it’s lame to separate reliability from satisfaction. How can one be satisfied knowing they have potential reliability issues? For me I really like my daily. It’s probably the best daily I have had because I can use for daily purposes and most family/weekend uses. But I’m no where near satisfied. This thing while is nice can go South wihen I least anticipate. On the other hand, I hate to drive my wife’s daily. But I am totally satisfied with the vehicle.
These surveys/reviews are like stock market articles. They have a 50% chance getting it right.
Seriously it’s lame to separate reliability from satisfaction. How can one be satisfied knowing they have potential reliability issues? For me I really like my daily. It’s probably the best daily I have had because I can use for daily purposes and most family/weekend uses. But I’m no where near satisfied. This thing while is nice can go South wihen I least anticipate. On the other hand, I hate to drive my wife’s daily. But I am totally satisfied with the vehicle.
Seriously it’s lame to separate reliability from satisfaction. How can one be satisfied knowing they have potential reliability issues? For me I really like my daily. It’s probably the best daily I have had because I can use for daily purposes and most family/weekend uses. But I’m no where near satisfied. This thing while is nice can go South wihen I least anticipate. On the other hand, I hate to drive my wife’s daily. But I am totally satisfied with the vehicle.Because most people don't keep their new cars long enough for there to be any serious reliability issues, especially when it's under the warranty period. It's not something they encounter on a day-to-day basis, where the real meat of their satisfaction with the vehicle comes from. Land Rover and Tesla have proven that questionable reliability doesn't stop cars from selling.
Because most people don't keep their new cars long enough for there to be any serious reliability issues, especially when it's under the warranty period. It's not something they encounter on a day-to-day basis, where the real meat of their satisfaction with the vehicle comes from. Land Rover and Tesla have proven that questionable reliability doesn't stop cars from selling.
My current Pacifica is much better, its only been in the shop once for a failure in the first year, but it wasn't fixed and has to go back in again. The 2017 Pacifica though was in the shop 27 times in 2.5 years. Thats pretty bad. It was off the road total over 40 days. It was traded with only 23,000 miles on it. Mine never left me stranded, but they leave people stranded on the Pacifica forum. There are now over 15 owners who have suffered engine failure before 60,000 miles.
And before you say "thats just forums" what forums here do you routinely see that people with new cars leave them stranded...ever? Where is there discussion of engine failure?















