Notices
Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova

2022 Toyota Tundra (780B)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 17, 2023 | 01:17 PM
  #1051  
Margate330's Avatar
Margate330
Lexus Champion
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 11,252
Likes: 1,598
From: FL
Default

Originally Posted by AJT123
I'd just rather have more than 5.0 flat for a truck, personal preference. I didn't like that my old Yukon was only 5.3L when previous Chevy trucks were 350s (5.7) for eons before it, even though it was a perfectly good powertrain. I just like big engines.
Sorry bro, I completely misunderstood your post.

I thought you were saying V-8 wasn't big enough for a truck but I see you are talking about displacement.

I'm not sure what size the Ford V-8 Tritan engine was but want to say more than 5.0 liters.
I've had pickup with bigger engines that that too.

My 460 CI in the Ford pickups back in the day were a beast but guzzled the freaking gas fast and the cash in my wallet too!
Old May 17, 2023 | 01:47 PM
  #1052  
AJT123's Avatar
AJT123
Lexus Champion
10 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 17,127
Likes: 521
From: Knoxville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by Margate330
Sorry bro, I completely misunderstood your post.

I thought you were saying V-8 wasn't big enough for a truck but I see you are talking about displacement.

I'm not sure what size the Ford V-8 Tritan engine was but want to say more than 5.0 liters.
I've had pickup with bigger engines that that too.

My 460 CI in the Ford pickups back in the day were a beast but guzzled the freaking gas fast and the cash in my wallet too!
Oh it's all good. The Ford 5.0 is more than potent. I just like big engines, 5.0 is a little small for a truck at least on paper. I liked when Ford had the 6.2.

I'm glad I was wrong and that the Coyote was developed for truck use.
Old Aug 6, 2023 | 02:14 AM
  #1053  
sensai's Avatar
sensai
Advanced
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 567
Likes: 758
From: CA
Default

boosted tundras
22 twin turbo v6 4x4 platinum leveled on 35's ~15,000 miles
08 supercharged v8 4x4 grade fox stage 4 on 33's ~105,000 miles



Old Aug 6, 2023 | 06:09 AM
  #1054  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
CL Community Team
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 80,844
Likes: 4,018
Default

very nice!
Old Aug 6, 2023 | 08:49 AM
  #1055  
AJT123's Avatar
AJT123
Lexus Champion
10 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 17,127
Likes: 521
From: Knoxville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by sensai
boosted tundras
22 twin turbo v6 4x4 platinum leveled on 35's ~15,000 miles
08 supercharged v8 4x4 grade fox stage 4 on 33's ~105,000 miles

Nice! How do you like the V6?
Old Aug 6, 2023 | 11:48 PM
  #1056  
sensai's Avatar
sensai
Advanced
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 567
Likes: 758
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by AJT123
Nice! How do you like the V6?
im liking the 3rd gen. very smooth truck, great transmission compared to 2nd gen. ive posted earlier about my experience but finally got my 08 back from out of state. im happy now. lol.
Old Aug 6, 2023 | 11:48 PM
  #1057  
sensai's Avatar
sensai
Advanced
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 567
Likes: 758
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
very nice!
thank you!
Old Aug 23, 2023 | 07:29 AM
  #1058  
AJT123's Avatar
AJT123
Lexus Champion
10 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 17,127
Likes: 521
From: Knoxville, TN
Default

https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...y-maintenance/

Ouch. 6.5 seconds 0-60. Virtually the same acceleration (with 130ft/lbs torque more) as the old V8. 13-16MPG, nothing meaningful in efficiency gains either.

Again, real world driving... a real truck is gonna be a truck---- thirsty.

It's not just C&D that's reporting this.
Old Aug 23, 2023 | 08:14 AM
  #1059  
Striker223's Avatar
Striker223
Lexus Champion
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 18,311
Likes: 1,786
From: Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by AJT123
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...y-maintenance/

Ouch. 6.5 seconds 0-60. Virtually the same acceleration (with 130ft/lbs torque more) as the old V8. 13-16MPG, nothing meaningful in efficiency gains either.

Again, real world driving... a real truck is gonna be a truck---- thirsty.

It's not just C&D that's reporting this.
It does better in EPA testing and that's all that matters, real world is a afterthought lol! All that extra complication as well, could of had a V8 and V8 super but no.....

I would honestly rather see a turbo 4 as the base/fleet engine like GM does with the 2.7 and then serious engines for those who want them.
Old Aug 23, 2023 | 09:04 AM
  #1060  
AJT123's Avatar
AJT123
Lexus Champion
10 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 17,127
Likes: 521
From: Knoxville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by Striker223
It does better in EPA testing and that's all that matters, real world is a afterthought lol! All that extra complication as well, could of had a V8 and V8 super but no.....

I would honestly rather see a turbo 4 as the base/fleet engine like GM does with the 2.7 and then serious engines for those who want them.
LOL....wait it gets better. The GM 2.7 four gets 3mpg worse than the 5.3L V8 (V8 truck also weighs 300lbs more) in real highway testing (70mph plus), another example of an answer to a question we didn't ask.

https://gmauthority.com/blog/2019/01...al-world-test/

They don't stock those 4cylinders at local dealers here much, every now and then they do. I haven't seen any on the road and I've been looking for the badges.
Old Feb 12, 2024 | 12:41 PM
  #1061  
JDR76's Avatar
JDR76
Lexus Champion
10 Year Member
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 13,273
Likes: 1,889
From: WA
Default

Car and Driver provided an update on their Long Term Test of the Tundra.

Our 2023 Toyota Tundra Hybrid Is a Great Truck for Road Tripping

In the run-up to 30,000 miles, a new tonneau cover and 500-plus miles of driving range showed us how the Tundra can be a long-haul hero.

30,000-Mile Update

It's no secret that the current crop of full-size pickups has become comically large compared with those from not so long ago. That has led some to question whether all of the 1.5 million people in the U.S. who bought one last year truly needed it. But as the past few months with our Tundra have shown, a half-ton pickup isn't just for hauling big payloads or towing heavy trailers. It can be great for road tripping too.
While a full-size pickup might not be our first choice for long highway slogs when traveling solo, the Tundra CrewMax is currently one of only two vehicles in our long-term fleet that has enough space for five people to comfortably make a long journey. That's exactly why testing director Dave VanderWerp chose it for an 1800-plus-mile roundtrip with his family, traveling from southeast Michigan to Hilton Head Island, South Carolina. And it proved to be a long-haul hero.


VanderWerp's family adventure was hardly the first time we drove the Tundra across multiple state lines, but it was among the first with the new bed cover installed. The RetraxONE MX tonneau cover cost $1550 and turns the truck's five-foot-five-inch cargo box into a massive trunk. The polycarbonate lid manually retracts into a cannister at the front of the bed. While it's lockable and easy to use, the cannister does protrude into the cargo bed by more than a foot, although the open space below it allows long items like lumber to use the entire length of the floor.

Most importantly, the tonneau cover kept VanderWerp's luggage dry during various downpours on his journey, although he noted that water beads dropped into the bed when he opened the cover. Still, the bolt-on accessory is a big reason the Tundra has become a road-trip all-star, as it helps preserve people space in the generously sized cabin. VanderWerp says he didn't hear a single complaint on the trip—at least not about the truck's comfort. Which is about the best you can hope for.


We might have hoped for better gas mileage from our Tundra hybrid pickup, which after 30,000 miles is still averaging 17 mpg. It got 18 mpg on the trip to South Carolina and back, respectable for a full-size truck at interstate-highway speeds. However, that's far thirstier than most other family-friendly alternatives like, say, our recent long-term Toyota Sienna hybrid, which managed 33 mpg on our 75-mph highway real-world test. Then again, the Sienna can't tow an 11,000-pound trailer or handle 1600 pounds of payload.

The crew-cab Tundra 4x4 can do both, and thanks to its enormous 32.2-gallon fuel tank, it can easily go 500 miles or more on the highway between fill-ups. Associate news editor Caleb Miller was happy to report that it only needed one fuel stop while traveling over 600 miles from Ann Arbor to his ancestral home in Brooklyn.

Young Miller also noted that the Tundra's driver's seat was supportive and didn't cause fatigue. As for maneuvering the nearly 20-foot-long Toyota in NYC? Let's just say that was more stressful, accompanied by the incessant beeps triggered by objects constantly threatening the parking sensors. When, after an extended search, Miller finally found parking, the previously annoying sensors, along with the bird's-eye-view camera and the digital rearview mirror, came to the rescue, helping him parallel-park the Tundra without a scratch.


We managed to wedge the Tundra's fifth service visit in among all the road trips that took place between 20,000 and 30,000 miles. This visit was outside of Toyota's standard two-year/25,000-mile complimentary service period, so we had to foot the $183 bill, which included an inspection and an oil and filter change. We also got a second key fob, gratis, as Toyota originally only provided one due to the global semiconductor shortage. We declined the tire rotation, as we performed the rotation ourselves after an out-of-spec alignment prematurely wore the front tires and required $625 to replace them. The truck's sixth service visit, at 30,000 miles, cost us quite a bit more. Along with filter replacements and the normal oil change, the $785 charge included replacing the fluids in the transfer case and both differentials. They also correctly aligned the front wheels at no cost considering we had them perform the previous work.

Shortly before the Tundra cracked the 30K milestone, we fitted it with a set of knobby General Grabber A/TX all-terrain tires. The rubber quartet costs about $1340 on Tire Rack. The Generals definitely make the truck look tougher, but we'll have to see how else they affect the Tundra over the final 10,000 miles of this long-term test. If the past few months are any guide, the Tundra will be swallowing those miles in big gulps.

Months in Fleet: 9 months Current Mileage: 30,012 miles
Average Fuel Economy: 17 mpg
Fuel Tank Size: 32.2 gal Observed Fuel Range: 540 miles
Service: $1238 Normal Wear: $0 Repair:$0
Damage and Destruction: $180
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...y-maintenance/
Old Feb 12, 2024 | 01:20 PM
  #1062  
AJT123's Avatar
AJT123
Lexus Champion
10 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 17,127
Likes: 521
From: Knoxville, TN
Default

18MPG highway??? That's crappy for what it's purporting to be.

Bring back the V8. Every time I step on the gas with the 5.7 I relish it.
Old Feb 12, 2024 | 01:39 PM
  #1063  
JDR76's Avatar
JDR76
Lexus Champion
10 Year Member
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 13,273
Likes: 1,889
From: WA
Default

Originally Posted by AJT123
18MPG highway??? That's crappy for what it's purporting to be.

Bring back the V8. Every time I step on the gas with the 5.7 I relish it.
They're averaging 17 mpg and I am averaging 11.5 with my V8. More power, massive more torque, and far better fuel economy. As an owner of the 5.7, I fully get the love for this V8 engine, but I am lost as to why people have such an issue with this V6TT. I know a few people who moved from the 5.7 to this new Tundra, and they all love them so far. I'll make the switch eventually.
Old Feb 12, 2024 | 01:57 PM
  #1064  
FrankReynoldsCPA's Avatar
FrankReynoldsCPA
Lexus Test Driver
15 Year Member
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 8,395
Likes: 361
From: Las Vegas
Default

405 lb ft at 2,000 RPM vs at 3,600 RPM. There's no question which engine has the grunt. Any perception of the 5.7 having more torque is just that...a perception only.
Old Feb 12, 2024 | 03:00 PM
  #1065  
AJT123's Avatar
AJT123
Lexus Champion
10 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 17,127
Likes: 521
From: Knoxville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by BrettJacks
405 lb ft at 2,000 RPM vs at 3,600 RPM. There's no question which engine has the grunt. Any perception of the 5.7 having more torque is just that...a perception only.
What engine are you comparing it to?

5.7 is producing 90% of the 403ft/lbs torque at 2200RPM so it's really not all that different.

5.7 is wonderfully torquey.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:08 PM.