When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I agree with most of what you are saying. I do think Toyota has dialed in a certain amount of “lag” in their LS500 but maybe done on purpose..I believe with the new 2022 update, it has been modified…in contrast to your Mercedes, they have more than 15 years of turbo models to dial in a different feel for their customers. I can absolutely promise you that Toyota tunes their models depending on category and demo, my Matrix with the 2.4 and the 5 speed is out of this world responsive..like WTF style…where my 1.8 Corolla is totally different in a more linear smooth and calm response. The my 04 4R is much more responsive than my 21 which feels like it was tuned for light acceleration etc. I think with the new Tundra, the hybrid max model is gonna be “the’ model to get
When I drove the LS500s, any lag in the throttle felt just like the throttle lag I was so accustomed to from driving Lexus cars for so long, I didn't feel any sort of additional turbo lag.
They definitely tailor each powertrain for the application I agree,
Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
So hood and the doors are aluminum. Front alluminum rear steel Surprised Toyota did that
Is there any truck out there that has a comparable adaptive variable suspension?
When I drove the LS500s, any lag in the throttle felt just like the throttle lag I was so accustomed to from driving Lexus cars for so long, I didn't feel any sort of additional turbo lag.
They definitely tailor each powertrain for the application I agree,
Ram has a variable air suspension available
Ram has air. I think on rear only. Tundra has both read air and all for wheels adaptive variable suspension.
When I drove the LS500s, any lag in the throttle felt just like the throttle lag I was so accustomed to from driving Lexus cars for so long, I didn't feel any sort of additional turbo lag.
They definitely tailor each powertrain for the application I agree
Again I'm not saying downsizing and turbocharging is a bad thing. Owning a downsized turbocharged car and driving several I have experience with them, and I had to get used to them. They didn't feel natural to me, that could be the way they are tuned of course. As far as the LS500, a friend of mine who owns a 460 test drove a 500, and said his 460 feels way better, even though it's less torqy. Throttle House said the same thing driving them back to back.
I've driven a 9th gen Accord Sport V6 as well as a 10th gen 2.0t Sport (9th gen manual, 10th gen 10 speed auto), and although the 2.0t has more power, torque and is faster, I would take the older 3.5 NA V6 over the 2.0t any day of the week because it feels way better
I totally agree the 460 feels better, I deliberately didn’t get a 500 I just don’t feel this turbo lag people talk about. If the 500 had the space and the ride characteristics I had in the 460 The engine wouldn’t have stopped me from getting one.
And like I said, my TTV8 S560 feels totally natural. Just has a lot of power but the delivery is very smooth and linear.
And we’re not talking about a turbo 4cyl vs a V6 here. This is a twin turbo V6 with a hot V. Totally different.
I totally agree the 460 feels better, I deliberately didn’t get a 500 I just don’t feel this turbo lag people talk about. If the 500 had the space and the ride characteristics I had in the 460 The engine wouldn’t have stopped me from getting one.
And like I said, my TTV8 S560 feels totally natural. Just has a lot of power but the delivery is very smooth and linear.
And we’re not talking about a turbo 4cyl vs a V6 here. This is a twin turbo V6 with a hot V. Totally different.
I was actually making more of a reference to turbo 4's, that's where you really feel the lag people mention, especially in smaller 1.5L's like I had. The power doesn't kick in right away. TT V6 and V8 are going to be different. You can tune them to be more linear as they less underpowered before the turbos kick in
V8TT have enough torque from the basic V8 before boost to not feel laggy, the 4 and 6 cylinders are worse, especially the 4 cylinders
That especially true for the smaller 4's. In my Civic Si it would lag, then shoot like a rubber band when boost hit and felt really unnatural. The Accord 2.0t was much better but still nowhere as good as the na V6 it replaced. I would imagine a fully loaded truck that's pulling loads the V8 pulled would feel lag until boost hits
I was actually making more of a reference to turbo 4's, that's where you really feel the lag people mention, especially in smaller 1.5L's like I had. The power doesn't kick in right away. TT V6 and V8 are going to be different. You can tune them to be more linear as they less underpowered before the turbos kick in
In the context of this thread we are talking about this specific engine, which is the same engine that’s in the LS500.
In the context of this thread we are talking about this specific engine, which is the same engine that’s in the LS500.
I went off topic a bit. I think generally this engine will do fine, I'm just wondering what it's reliability will be long term if it's frequently loaded to near capacity hauling large loads and used for towing
I went off topic a bit. I think generally this engine will do fine, I'm just wondering what it's reliability will be long term if it's frequently loaded to near capacity hauling large loads and used for towing
I have confidence enough in Toyota to assume it will be fine
That especially true for the smaller 4's. In my Civic Si it would lag, then shoot like a rubber band when boost hit and felt really unnatural. The Accord 2.0t was much better but still nowhere as good as the na V6 it replaced. I would imagine a fully loaded truck that's pulling loads the V8 pulled would feel lag until boost hits
during towing the ecoboost is constantly boosting. The Fast Lane Truck did a mpg test between the 3.5 ecoboost and 5.7 Hemi, the ecoboost was abyssmal 8.5 mpg under towing while the hemi was 11-12. Turbos under boost are killer for mpg
during towing the ecoboost is constantly boosting. The Fast Lane Truck did a mpg test between the 3.5 ecoboost and 5.7 Hemi, the ecoboost was abyssmal 8.5 mpg under towing while the hemi was 11-12. Turbos under boost are killer for mpg
You mean the higher the boost, the more fuel consumed (more air means more fuel). If you drive normal than you get better mpg, but as soon as you go down on the throttle, mpg goes down the drain. On my Si I would get 28 to 38 mpg driving normal, but spirited (most of my driving) it would drop between 22 and 25, similar mileage to my Camry SE with the 3.3L V6