When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
This thread got REALLY long so I didn't read every response. But I did want to add that Tesla did have a program where you could pull up to a station and swap your depleted battery for a full one. They did this because people (who didn't own Teslas as it turned out) complained about that. So Elon Musk implemented that and guess what? No one used it, lol. So it obviously isn't a problem. Personally I would've loved that because I could swap out my old battery for a hopefully new one! I don't own a Tesla, but that's the only reason I would've used such a station. https://www.tesla.com/blog/battery-swap-pilot-program
Better Place tried it in Israel 10ish years ago. They're out of business now, but the concept was pretty cool. The problem is the cost of infrastructure is much higher for something like that then creating charging stations. You have to forecast how many battery packs to stock, you have to store them, you'll probably need at least 1-2 people on site to manage the station, etc. Also, while battery degradation isn't a concern of mine, I know how much I can get out of my car given the season, state of charge, etc. because I drove it to that point. If I had a battery that still had 3% battery degradation, did a swap, and ended up with one that had 10% degradation, I'd be more than a little peeved.
That's one of the potential problems, Steve....self-driving cars are only going to make it even more so.
I'm not quite Evitzee's age (close)...but I find that, while electronic safety-aids are nice to have (one reason why I got my GX, with its blind-zone and cross-traffic-alerts), most of the act of driving is actually good for one's brain, mind, and co-ordination...like crossword puzzles, helping to keep them sharp as one ages.
No offense, but you may need the stimulation of driving or crossword puzzles to "keep you sharp" but I don't lol. Life comes at me 120 MPH every minute of every day, plenty to keep me sharp. Driving is just a routine thing for me that for most of my day I'd be happy to give up to technology. When I want to go out for a fun drive, I can still do that.
Originally Posted by Och
I can attest to life being frenetic - those of you who are retired may not be feeling the pinch, but for the rest of us it's getting absolutely out of hand, to the point that I sometimes wish there was no internet or cell phones. Can't even enjoy a motorcycle ride during work week anymore, constantly have to pull over, take off the helmet and return calls. They even make helmets not where your calls and texts are projected on the glass.
Oh totally. I often wish we weren't so accessible, but it is what it is.
No offense, but you may need the stimulation of driving or crossword puzzles to "keep you sharp" but I don't lol. Life comes at me 120 MPH every minute of every day, plenty to keep me sharp. Driving is just a routine thing for me that for most of my day I'd be happy to give up to technology. When I want to go out for a fun drive, I can still do that.Oh totally. I often wish we weren't so accessible, but it is what it is.
Well, you get paid to be accessible. Haha. Higher the pay, the more accessible you become. I can't remember a vacation where I didn't have at least a couple meetings virtually that I had to attend.
Well, you get paid to be accessible. Haha. Higher the pay, the more accessible you become. I can't remember a vacation where I didn't have at least a couple meetings virtually that I had to attend.
Oh, without a doubt. I always say, they don't just give money away, if you want to make a lot of money there are ALWAYS big tradeoffs you have to deal with.
One question to all the EV owners here. How many of you have an EV as your only means of transportation? I would guess most have an EV as second or third car so charging isn't a concern.
The reason I ask is I am an empty nester and my wife and I share one vehicle.
I have two cars - one very old ICE car that is only still around because I'm passing it on to my younger son when he get's his drivers license. It doesn't get driven by either my wife or I. So technically I have only one car that is an EV. Once you own an EV, you will know that charging is definitely NOT a concern.
I consider myself fortunate, I own a 2016 Model X 75D and 2017 Model S 75D. EVs for us were a way to commute to work faster by using the carpool lanes and when I calculated how much gas we were putting into our GX 470, It was an easy decision to move over to EVs. EVs are our primary means of transport.
We take a 1-2 long trips throughout the year and when we stop to charge (~2.5hrs) we refuel our bodies at the same time and take bio breaks (OC to Vegas and back). 30 minutes at a Supercharger gets me to the next charging location or my destination. I have a two car garage and two chargers tied to a 50A breaker that is able to add ~28miles/hr to the battery. The Tesla chargers are smart and can share the power and they know when one is finished charging and the other can grab the available power. It's very rare that we run the battery below 30 miles available. Once when we did this and plugged both in at night we had a full charge by morning (charging started at 10:30pm for lowest SCE rates).
I also have my remaining Lexus (6 previous models), a 2016 GSF for the refinement and ICE sounds I miss in the Teslas. It's still slower than my Model X but I don't care, it's staying in my garage for the long run.
thank you so much for sharing your EV experience! sounds awesome. again you're in the ideal place to have that setup. would love to hear about your X experience (maybe pm or separate thread) pros/cons/likes/dislikes/issues, etc.
Originally Posted by Evitzee
I still haven't seen a real case made as to WHY we want to go from fossil fuel to electric vehicles.
at a high level as to they 'why', the oil business in particular is pretty nasty or sometimes horrifically nasty (exxon valdez, bp rig explosion, etc). and shipping thick black goo drilled out of the ground often MILES below, and then sending that to refineries hundreds or thousands of miles away, and then sending the refined fuels/oils via ship tankers, truck tankers, or pipelines to where they need to go (often thousands of miles away) seems like a LUDICROUSLY inefficient way to do things, but since there's been no alternative to it, the world has made it work, and it's pretty astonishing. we take for granted filling a car at the conveniently local gas station without thinking of the insane effort it took to make that possible. worse, the environmental damage, not just geological, but obviously emissions too. again, through tech and regulation that's become FAR less of an issue per vehicle/use but the numbers of vehicles, ships, planes, etc. keeps increasing, so it's pretty intractable. container cargo ships criss crossing the world powered by diesel are an environmental obscenity but again, there's been no other options. maybe eventually a hyperloop across the oceans will eliminate a lot of that.
at a high level for EVs or electricity generally, the sun's energy is FREE and we should use it! no digging it out of the ground. no transporting it. it's kind of a no brainer. until recently historically it just hasn't been efficient enough but the tech is improving rapidly and then there's the 'storage problem' for when it's not sunny, but even that is slowly being solved. it's pretty easy on a house, but harder for a large scale use, but in australia and other places tesla and others are building massive battery banks. there will be other solutions.
obviously there's other 'clean' means of creating electricity like hydroelectric, wind, waves, and there no doubt will be others.
so there's the "real case as to WHY" we should a) end mass scale use of fossil fuels and b) switch to electricity.
Scientists are in agreement that if the US got off of ALL FF NOW the effect on the temperature in 2100 is almost unmeasureable.
right but it's not JUST about the US. the whole world has to lessen its reliance on fossil fuels, especially coal. unfortunately china, due to its insatiably growing demand for energy continues to make new coal plants.
So what's the point of totally upending the mature, well functioning gasoline/diesel supply system we have developed over the last century?
see above.
I think two main reasons, 1) the tech industry sees the golden opportunity to take over one of the largest industries in the world (vehicles) for their own economic gain, and 2) governments like the idea of EVs and self driving cars as a way to get people out of their private vehicles ($$) and into more dense living arrangements where they can be forced into using public transportation.
you may well be right on both fronts but that alone doesn't mean we shouldn't do it.
People say they are all for 'going green' to help the environment, but digging deeper into that shows people are willing to spend $50 a year or so to do that, they don't realize but the cost will be in the many thousands of dollars per year for going all EV and renewables. Some honesty would be refreshing.
and the FF industry has been honest? only through litigation! again i'm not down on ICE vehicles, and i'm not ready for an EV myself, but that case gets more and more compelling, for more and more people, by the day. arguments against it are a bit like people clinging to land lines or DVDs because they don't like cell phones or streaming video.
As far as self driving cars are concerned, I just don't get it. I'm 70 and still enjoy driving my three cars and my Yamaha FZ-10 sport bike.
you enjoy driving them recreationally. i assume you're not stuck in massive daily slog traffic or other trips that you really don't WANT to take. if anything, COVID has made the country more divided with 'knowledge' workers able to work from home and the rest still having to drive somewhere (or take public transportation) to clean places, make food, tend to the sick, etc. for those who HAVE to drive, self-driving cars will be one of the greatest liberating things ever. even commercial truck drivers, who no doubt will become endangered, will be forced to do something healthier (driving for a living is VERY unhealthy not to mention dangerous). but like you, i enjoy driving my sports car for fun, but thankfully, i don't have to do it every day.
On the return trip I decided to take I-10 west from Houston, big mistake as the interstate is totally being reconstructed for 30 miles or so. I got off to fuel up and the normal ramp to get back on no longer existed, nothing but orange barrels and cones for two or three miles. Got to a stop sign and it said 'frontage road closed', so no way to get back on the road so I had to go over the overpass and double back six miles to find an open entrance ramp. There is no vehicle today that could have navigated the route, no lane markings, some dirt stretches, no road signs, road graders/pickup trucks all over the place, you had to think your way through the situation. A fully autonomous driving car with no steering wheel would most likely have pulled over and decided it couldn't do the job. No thanks.
and 10 years ago you couldn't ask your phone "where's the nearest starbucks?" you're truly underestimating (or just not understanding) the pace of change and the coming AI complete transformation of everything for good and bad.
Fossil fuel vehicles will be around for many, many decades, I won't have to worry about EVs or self driving cars in my lifetime, but its disconcerting to see people jump on these bandwagons without really thinking through what they are trying to do. They do the first stage thinking, but not the subsequent stages.
i believe you are doing the same, only seeing it from what car tech is TODAY. in 5 years, it will be completely different.
Originally Posted by mmarshall
^^^^ Here's the whole thread, in a nutshell, if a somewhat long one. A superb post, Evitzee. Virtually everything you said (at least 95%) is right on the money. There's little if anything I can add to it....so I won't.
respectfully, as shown by your love of old 'retro' cars, like evitzee you're not keen on the rapid changes we're seeing, that are coming, like it or not. and again, if there's a cleaner alternative to the oil/gas industry, i'm all for it.
I'm not quite Evitzee's age (close)...but I find that, while electronic safety-aids are nice to have (one reason why I got my GX, with its blind-zone and cross-traffic-alerts), most of the act of driving is actually good for one's brain, mind, and co-ordination...like crossword puzzles, helping to keep them sharp as one ages.
driving does require skill, but as steve points out, not just him, but MOST knowledge workers today need to be available at all hours to respond to texts/emails/virtual meetings/websites, etc. driving becomes simply a waste of time unless it's recreational.
as far as staying sharp, as you say, use any number of the zillion brain training apps, plus physical exercise, plus forums like this!
Originally Posted by EZZ
Well, you get paid to be accessible. Haha. Higher the pay, the more accessible you become.
depends. if you're well paid, you can always hire minions to be accessible for you. or eventually, bots.
I can't remember a vacation where I didn't have at least a couple meetings virtually that I had to attend.
that's exactly why i left the big corporate world. a 'vacation' with virtual work meetings isn't a vacation. now self employed, obviously when i go on vacation i still get email/texts/calls, etc. but i can choose to ignore them if i want.
Well, you get paid to be accessible. Haha. Higher the pay, the more accessible you become. I can't remember a vacation where I didn't have at least a couple meetings virtually that I had to attend.
Yup. Always happens. Probably one of the worst was a few years ago when we were in Hawaii, and my wife had a 2 hour meeting that she had to attend at 2am.....
But agreed wholeheartedly with the "always on, always connected" nature now. Having now worked from home for the past year, it's kind of astonishing to look back and see how much of a drain on productivity the daily commute really is. Obviously not commuting at all is one way to eliminate that drain, but that doesn't work for everybody. Being able to be fully productive while on the road, thanks to autonomous driving would be a solution for those that have no choice but to travel.
depends. if you're well paid, you can always hire minions to be accessible for you. or eventually, bots.
that's exactly why i left the big corporate world. a 'vacation' with virtual work meetings isn't a vacation. now self employed, obviously when i go on vacation i still get email/texts/calls, etc. but i can choose to ignore them if i want.
I have the opposite opinion of self-employment. My friends that have their own business work waaaaay harder than I do. In the end, if I don't attend a meeting, i have minions to cover my back but if the business is mine and I blow something off, it comes back to me as the owner which is way riskier. Also, good post on why an oil based transportation backbone is absolutely bonkers in the long run. We need to begin this transition now and we will all learn, that resistance is futile
at a high level for EVs or electricity generally, the sun's energy is FREE and we should use it! no digging it out of the ground. no transporting it. it's kind of a no brainer. until recently historically it just hasn't been efficient enough but the tech is improving rapidly and then there's the 'storage problem' for when it's not sunny, but even that is slowly being solved. it's pretty easy on a house, but harder for a large scale use, but in australia and other places tesla and others are building massive battery banks. there will be other solutions.
Yeah the storage piece of it is a solved problem even at large scale, just with limited adoption at this point. A friend of mine spent a few years working for a company that designed, installed, and supported battery systems for industrial customers. The basic concept is these companies would have huge factory campuses that would charge their batteries from the grid overnight while they were idle, then disconnect from the grid in the morning and operate the entire campus from stored power all day long. Power utilities give them HUGE rebates, in some cases resulting in net cash inflow from the utility to the business. The reason for this is these systems help level out the overall load on the grid over the 24h day, and reduce the delta between peak and minimum usage. That, in turn, reduces the need for peaking plants that are incredibly expensive to operate on a per MWh basis, compared to the baseline plants that run all the time.
This thread got REALLY long so I didn't read every response. But I did want to add that Tesla did have a program where you could pull up to a station and swap your depleted battery for a full one. They did this because people (who didn't own Teslas as it turned out) complained about that. So Elon Musk implemented that and guess what? No one used it, lol. So it obviously isn't a problem. Personally I would've loved that because I could swap out my old battery for a hopefully new one! I don't own a Tesla, but that's the only reason I would've used such a station. https://www.tesla.com/blog/battery-swap-pilot-program
Obviously it wasn't a problem at the time for all seven people that had EVs back then. There are companies now that are restarting this model, and in the long run it might be a lot more viable than chargers.
I have the opposite opinion of self-employment. My friends that have their own business work waaaaay harder than I do.
understand it can be that way, but if someone loves what they do, more power to them. i've been more focused on recurring revenue in recent years, and delegating more, and it's making things easier.
Also, good post on why an oil based transportation backbone is absolutely bonkers in the long run. We need to begin this transition now and we will all learn, that resistance is futile
thank you! yes indeed.
Originally Posted by geko29
Yeah the storage piece of it is a solved problem even at large scale, just with limited adoption at this point.
it may be 'solved' but i imagine it's HUGELY expensive and obviously can take up a ton of space. but as with everything this too shall improve.
I have the opposite opinion of self-employment. My friends that have their own business work waaaaay harder than I do. In the end, if I don't attend a meeting, i have minions to cover my back but if the business is mine and I blow something off, it comes back to me as the owner which is way riskier. Also, good post on why an oil based transportation backbone is absolutely bonkers in the long run. We need to begin this transition now and we will all learn, that resistance is futile
This is true, but when you work for yourself it feels different than it does when you work for someone else.
This is true, but when you work for yourself it feels different than it does when you work for someone else.
Absolutely! Much much better to work for yourself, especially when you love the job. I imagine i'll have to get my own business someday as I'll age out of corporate. Sad truth in most corporations...you get too expensive as you climb the ladder.
Maybe i'll buy up land around gas stations and put up EV chargers...