When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Absolutely!! My 14 RX bought used with 6k on the clock, now have 50k on it. One issue since ownership, front grill replaced under warranty due to peeling paint. The car is totally boring and has the most ugly interior I've ever seen but it's never let me down. Can other competitors beat that?!
many competitors probably can't beat how boring and ugly it is. but anyway, let's say you got the '14 RX in '15. that means you've put 44k on it in 4 years, or a whopping 11k a year (~211mi. a week). i would HOPE it would be reliable!
Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
A V12 is truly needed.
at this point you're just trolling, you know darned well lexus is NEVER coming out with a v12, nor is almost anyone else. besides mb, who else even offers one?
at this point you're just trolling, you know darned well lexus is NEVER coming out with a v12, nor is almost anyone else. besides mb, who else even offers one?
So, everyone on here complains that Lexus is not doing enough on the top end, so a suggestion is out for a V12....gets shot down! Not trolling at all. I don’t think the top end for Lexus is bad at all. But I would love to see what Lexus could do in the $200K+ category of cars (such as 12 cylinder Audi, Mercedes or BMW).....hell, the Lexus sedan flagship has no V8....but a Genesis flagship does....there is something seriously wrong. At least there once was a Lexus V10
Last edited by Toys4RJill; Dec 8, 2019 at 04:01 PM.
at this point you're just trolling, you know darned well lexus is NEVER coming out with a v12, nor is almost anyone else. besides mb, who else even offers one?
I basically agree with Jill, and don't see it as a troll. It's true that V12s (and W12s, if you want to include the now-defunct VW Phaeton) are few and far between. But that is exactly the point that Jill is making....more are needed, especially from luxury automakers like Lexus. Not everyone is enthralled with smaller engines and turbos. IMO, despite the efficiency factor, turbos are more moving parts to wear out or fail, extra ductwork and hardware under the hood to clutter things up, more heat and pressure inside the engine, more stress on the engine oil (although today's synthetic oils are admittedly the best ever produced), and, in some cases, require careful start-up/shutdown techniques, although not as such as in the past. Most (but not necessarily all) of this is being done in the name of CAFE.....which comes from the government more than car buyers themselves. I've long-believed (and still do) that, for everyday driving, N/A V12s, V8s, and V6s are preferable to smaller engines with turbos. And that's exactly what were are seeing disappear from many vehicles.....larger N/A blocks. I wouldn't trade my N/A 3.6L GM V6 for any four-banger on the market., turbo or not...although, of course with some vehicles, you have no choice...4-banger turbos are both standard and optional, like the Lincoln Corsair, or it's a choice between a turbo-4 and twin-turbo V6, like some other Cadillac and Lincoln products.
I remain unconvinced that an LS that was more “true” to the heritage of the LS (soft, smooth, with a V8) than the LS500 would sell well. Everyone assumes the LS500 sales struggle is a result of its design. I’m not to sure.
I think Lexus messed up by keeping the LS460 for too long. It should have been an all new car back in 2013 or 2014, instead of a refresh. Many folks who had LS460 leases left the brand because they were ready for a new LS, which didn’t come until 2018. By the time the LS500 came out, those buyers had already moved on, mostly to the S Class I think. So I think an LS, soft and with a V8, would also be struggling like the current LS500.
And now I see Lexus making the same mistake with the GS and the IS too. Frustrating. But maybe this change in leadership will help before it becomes too late.